Fucking Pig Feds, This story has me absolutely disgusted.

apple0154 said:
No need to confiscate anyone's property. I'm sure there are penty of people who would operate a rooming house. Guaranteed rent paid by the government. Can't beat that.
Click to expand...

Leave out the gobblement and we got a deal. You could alternately let them live free of charge in your house. Now that would be living your liberal ideals
 
apple0154 said:
They'll be put away if they act like lunatics with guns. I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. Those wackos who say the government is socialist and they'll take up arms.
Click to expand...
so it's lunacy to defend your own property from being stolen by lazy assed statists? and i'm totally not surprised that you're completely ignoring the paradox LOL
 
apple0154 said:
I understand the decision very well. The government is allowed to tax the people to pay for ObamaCare. I understand what a democratically elected government is and I understand there are people who refuse to go along to get along and kicking their asses is not oppression. It is education. And, finally, I understand the Preamble "....states in general terms, and courts have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers' intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped the Constitution would achieve." That's fairly straight forward.

So, what does it say? It says, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

A more perfect union. Promote the general welfare. Secure the blessings of liberty.

Does that sound like they couldn't care less if 45,000 citizens needlessly died every year? Is needless death a blessing of liberty? Does 45,000 deaths make for a more perfect union? What about welfare, general or otherwise? Is it beneficial to the welfare of the country to have 45,000 citizens needlessly dying each and every year? If so, perhaps you can explain your reasoning.
Click to expand...
as you consistently misinterpret shit, i'm not going to try to explain to you again why you're wrong. i'm just going to tell you that you will most likely be one of the traitors that ends up the target of those who restore the constitution when you get the tyrannical federal government to start stealing peoples property to provide for your laziness.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
as you consistently misinterpret shit, i'm not going to try to explain to you again why you're wrong. i'm just going to tell you that you will most likely be one of the traitors that ends up the target of those who restore the constitution when you get the tyrannical federal government to start stealing peoples property to provide for your laziness.
Click to expand...

Surely you can do better than that! Me misinterpreting shit?

I gave you easy questions. The Founding Fathers mentioned a more perfect union. Promote the general welfare. Secure the blessings of liberty.

Question one: Does that sound like they couldn't care less if 45,000 citizens needlessly died every year?

Question two: Is needless death a blessing of liberty?

Question three: Does 45,000 deaths make for a more perfect union?

Question four: What about welfare, general or otherwise? Is it beneficial to the welfare of the country to have 45,000 citizens needlessly dying each and every year?

A simple "Yes" or "No" to each question will suffice but you're welcome to add comments.
 
why should I answer your questions when you can't answer if you think the constitution was written to RESTRICT the federal government or not. I probably know what you're going to answer, considering that you trust the government more than you trust a person, which makes you that antithesis of what the founders were, therefore most of your opinions are totally irrelevant and wrong.
 
apple0154 said:
Surely you can do better than that! Me misinterpreting shit?

I gave you easy questions. The Founding Fathers mentioned a more perfect union. Promote the general welfare. Secure the blessings of liberty.

Question one: Does that sound like they couldn't care less if 45,000 citizens needlessly died every year?

Question two: Is needless death a blessing of liberty?

Question three: Does 45,000 deaths make for a more perfect union?

Question four: What about welfare, general or otherwise? Is it beneficial to the welfare of the country to have 45,000 citizens needlessly dying each and every year?

A simple "Yes" or "No" to each question will suffice but you're welcome to add comments.
Click to expand...

Your interpretation of what a "more perfect union" and "promote the general welfare" are is where you fall into the ditch.
 
Wise Old Man said:
That's why communism doesn't work. Not everyone contributes their fair share so more is taken from those who have more, which isn't fair at all. Dumb asses.
Click to expand...

Are you reading what you write? What can be more fair than those who have more to contribute do contribute more? The problem with communism was corruption just like what is happening in Greece with the financial problems and it's a simple problem to solve. Prosecute those who are corrupt. Instead of trying to prevent the government from helping people because the government is corrupt do something about the government.
 
apple0154 said:
Are you reading what you write? What can be more fair than those who have more to contribute do contribute more? The problem with communism was corruption just like what is happening in Greece with the financial problems and it's a simple problem to solve. Prosecute those who are corrupt. Instead of trying to prevent the government from helping people because the government is corrupt do something about the government.
Click to expand...

Why should I contribute more simply because I have more when you didn't work as hard as I did?
 
apple0154 said:
Are you reading what you write? What can be more fair than those who have more to contribute do contribute more? The problem with communism was corruption just like what is happening in Greece with the financial problems and it's a simple problem to solve. Prosecute those who are corrupt. Instead of trying to prevent the government from helping people because the government is corrupt do something about the government.
Click to expand...
how do you propose to do that when it's the government that does the prosecuting?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
why should I answer your questions when you can't answer if you think the constitution was written to RESTRICT the federal government or not. I probably know what you're going to answer, considering that you trust the government more than you trust a person, which makes you that antithesis of what the founders were, therefore most of your opinions are totally irrelevant and wrong.
Click to expand...

The government can be restricted and still be able to help the people. If that wasn't the intent why the Preamble? Are you saying the Founding Fathers perpetrated a scam on the people?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top