Fucking Pig Feds, This story has me absolutely disgusted.

I'm not asking for anything myself. I' m quite comfortable, thank-you. However, I do advocate the less fortunate be helped and stop the lies and nonsense the country can not afford to do so when affordability has absolutely nothing to do with it. Selfishness and greed. That's all it is.



As I said I do not know the details of his financial situation. Perhaps you can tell us what his hourly rate should be. What do you consider is fair compensation? Is sounds like you know the details.

On that note I'm well past my siesta time and my cat is giving me dirty looks. I'll be back later. Thank-you for the entertaining exchange.

Helping the less fortunate has nothing to do with our govt. The US govt was not set up to be a charity organization. You're confused.

Now I know you're confused. You're the one claiming Gates didn't really work, so you tell us how much he should keep.
 
The government can be restricted and still be able to help the people. If that wasn't the intent why the Preamble? Are you saying the Founding Fathers perpetrated a scam on the people?
the government IS restricted, not can be, and they are able to help the people within the limits prescribed by the constitutional powers in the articles. NOT THE PREAMBLE.
 
OK, so tell me, what do you think "promote the general welfare" means?
it means to keep the limitations and restrictions to a minimum in order for people to PURSUE (read this as 'keeping the fruits of their labors') happiness. It doesn't mean that the federal government can ignore the restrictions applied to them in order to make everyones life easier.
 
How do you contest the government if it steals your house? You keep implying there are people who are considering taking on the government. Why don't they take on the government regarding prosecution? In other words are you against government corruption regarding the money it has to help others or are you against the idea of government helping others regardless of whether the government is corrupt?
so are you promoting 'peoples courts' for cops and prosecutors who are corrupt?
 
Picture you having a business and two people work in the office. One is a woman, 5'4", 120 pounds. The other office worker is a guy, 6', 200 pounds. You want to rearrange the office, switch the desks around. Who would you ask to help you move the desks?
that's a really stupid analogy and not worth answering. try again.
 
Then I'll ask again. What is the purpose of the Preamble?

'We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Are those do-nothing verbs? Sit back and watch verbs? Or active verbs? Is it just a flowery statement that means nothing or is it a statement telling the people the Federal Government is there for their benefit, that they want to ensure a decent and prosperous and equitable (just and right; fair) life for the citizens? What makes sense to you?
I know you're trying to obfuscate the whole issue in order to pursue your socialist agenda, but do you truly need a lesson on how the constitution works?
 
Helping the less fortunate has nothing to do with our govt. The US govt was not set up to be a charity organization. You're confused.

Who said anything about a charity organization. It is charity when they employ armies? Why should they defend your property against the Gauls and Moors when they come looting? :)

Now I know you're confused. You're the one claiming Gates didn't really work, so you tell us how much he should keep.

I never said Gates didn't work. As I noted it's reasonable to conclude other people were working in their garage or basement at the same time he was tinkering with computers. While most of the other people never earned a dime from computers what hard work did Gates do that paid over a billion dollars? What hours did he work? What was his rate per hour?
 
it means to keep the limitations and restrictions to a minimum in order for people to PURSUE (read this as 'keeping the fruits of their labors') happiness. It doesn't mean that the federal government can ignore the restrictions applied to them in order to make everyones life easier.

So saving the lives of 45,000 a year does not benefit the general welfare of the country? Do I have to post that Jack Benny skit again? Happiness is keeping your money but not your life?
 
Back
Top