French elections tmrw april 10. NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS, MUST SHOW VOTER ID

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
This is how it has to be if you want to call your country a democracy. There is massive democrat electoral fraud in america and the corrupt press is in on it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...hines-paper-ballots-everyone-must-show-voter/

april 9 2022 Democrats could never make it in France.
They can’t cheat.

Voting in the French presidential election is Sunday. There are NO mail-in ballots. There are no dirty voting machines. Only paper ballots are used. And EVERYONE must show a voter ID.

ABC News reported:

French voters in Sunday’s presidential election will use the same system that’s been used for generations: paper ballots that are cast in person and counted by hand. Despite periodic calls for more flexibility or modernization, France doesn’t do mail-in voting, early voting or use voting machines en masse like the United States. President Emmanuel Macron is the clear front-runner, though an unprecedented proportion of people say they are unsure who they will vote for or whether they will vote at all.

Voters must be at least 18 years old. About 48.7 million French are registered on the electoral rolls of the place where they live.

Voters make their choices in a booth, with the curtains closed, then place their ballot in an envelope that is then put into a transparent ballot box. They must show photo identification and sign a document, next to their name, to complete the process.
 
in the US virtually everybody who's not a Democrat and / or Leftist wants something similar here

In France there is no "electoral college". The president is elected on the basis of the national popular vote.

If the US had that system, there would have been one (single term) Republican president in the past thirty years.

It would destroy the two-party system, unless the GOP could reform itself as a responsible, moderate conservative party.
 
In France there is no "electoral college". The president is elected on the basis of the national popular vote.

If the US had that system, there would have been one (single term) Republican president in the past thirty years.

It would destroy the two-party system, unless the GOP could reform itself as a responsible, moderate conservative party.

Do you seriously want a Dem admin run by Regressive imbeciles like the Squad, Stacey Abrams and others too numerous to.mention.

CS Lewis is the man who had the measure of those evil bastards.

Progressivism has no sound philosophical basis. Equally unsound is what C.S. Lewis called the “chronological snobbery” built into progressivism—“the assumption that whatever has gone out of date is on that account discredited.” A true idea does not cease to be true simply because those in power no longer hold it.

The irony of progressivism is that its policies almost always entail a return to the bad ideas and corrupt practices of ancient times. It is old barbarism in a new guise. What exactly is new about euthanizing the elderly, killing babies, celebrating promiscuity, and so forth? Even its more sophisticated notions of a “living Constitution” and a collectivist federal government (ideas which are hallmarks of the American Progressive movement) are simply glorified versions of tyrannies well known to the ancients.

The term progressive invariably attaches itself to policies that might have even made debauched pagans blush. Self-described “progressive” Democrats, for example, have no qualms about extending the term to openly brutal practices like partial-birth abortion. Barack Obama, who takes pride in the term “progressive,” couldn’t even bring himself to oppose laws against infanticide as a state senator in Illinois.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...ce-of-death-and-terror-in-the-twentieth-cent/
 
Do you seriously want a Dem admin run by Regressive imbeciles like the Squad, Stacey Abrams and others too numerous to.mention.

CS Lewis is the man who had the measure of those evil bastards.

Progressivism has no sound philosophical basis. Equally unsound is what C.S. Lewis called the “chronological snobbery” built into progressivism—“the assumption that whatever has gone out of date is on that account discredited.” A true idea does not cease to be true simply because those in power no longer hold it.

The irony of progressivism is that its policies almost always entail a return to the bad ideas and corrupt practices of ancient times. It is old barbarism in a new guise. What exactly is new about euthanizing the elderly, killing babies, celebrating promiscuity, and so forth? Even its more sophisticated notions of a “living Constitution” and a collectivist federal government (ideas which are hallmarks of the American Progressive movement) are simply glorified versions of tyrannies well known to the ancients.

The term progressive invariably attaches itself to policies that might have even made debauched pagans blush. Self-described “progressive” Democrats, for example, have no qualms about extending the term to openly brutal practices like partial-birth abortion. Barack Obama, who takes pride in the term “progressive,” couldn’t even bring himself to oppose laws against infanticide as a state senator in Illinois.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...ce-of-death-and-terror-in-the-twentieth-cent/

And yet you live in a place that is run by

%2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F8bfea65c-6de1-11ea-971b-b6700f61de5e.jpg
 
Do you seriously want a Dem admin run by Regressive imbeciles like the Squad, Stacey Abrams and others too numerous to.mention.

In post#2 Gardner said that everybody like him wants the US to have something similar to the French presidential system.

The major difference is that France does not have an electoral college. I explained what that would have entailed in the US: one Republican presidential term in the past 30 years.

I assume people like Gardner think that could be overcome by eliminating election fraud. That's wishful thinking. Nobody - including Trump and his minions - has found any evidence of significant fraud in recent US presidential elections.

The bottom line is that adopting "something similar" to the French system would destroy the GOP, unless it could accomplish some radical reforms.
 
The major difference is that France does not have an electoral college. I explained what that would have entailed in the US: one Republican presidential term in the past 30 years.

HAHAHA. How many times must we explain this.??? The electoral college is WRITTEN INTO OUR CONSTITUTION!!!! Mail-in ballots are not. They were invented by democrats for the sole purpose of stealing elections. Nearly everyone who gets a mail-in ballot sells it .
 
In France there is no "electoral college". The president is elected on the basis of the national popular vote.

If the US had that system, there would have been one (single term) Republican president in the past thirty years.

It would destroy the two-party system, unless the GOP could reform itself as a responsible, moderate conservative party.

What the hell does that have to do with voting in person, using voter ID, and eliminating things like mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, ballot drop boxes, and all the other squirrely shit the Democrats want for our elections?
 
Turnout set to be lowest for years

After nine hours of voting, election officials have revealed that turnout is 65%, that's well down on recent elections. Five years ago it was 69.42%.

We already had a sense of a low turnout earlier, when turnout was given as 25.48%, the lowest since 2002. Some areas including Corsica and parts of Paris are reporting very low turnouts little higher than 50%.

It's not been low across the country. Areas including in the Loire valley and the Dordogne are well over 70% - and we've been getting reports of traffic jams in some of the big cities.

French election turnouts are traditionally high: the first-round turnout in 2017 was 77,77%.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-60940767
 
After nine hours of voting, election officials have revealed that turnout is 65%, that's well down on recent elections. Five years ago it was 69.42%.

We already had a sense of a low turnout earlier, when turnout was given as 25.48%, the lowest since 2002. Some areas including Corsica and parts of Paris are reporting very low turnouts little higher than 50%.

It's not been low across the country. Areas including in the Loire valley and the Dordogne are well over 70% - and we've been getting reports of traffic jams in some of the big cities.

French election turnouts are traditionally high: the first-round turnout in 2017 was 77,77%.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-60940767

So? What does that have to do with anything we're discussing here?
 
My colleague Kim Willsher spent the last couple of days on the trail with Marine Le Pen during the closing moments of her first round campaign, speaking to her voters and reflecting on how the far-right leader had changed the image the public has of both her and her party:

Marine Le Pen took over what was then the Front National in 2011 and set about laundering its image, tarnished by xenophobic neo-Nazi thugs with shaven heads and jackboots. Members were expelled for racist and antisemitic remarks or for defending Philippe Pétain, head of France’s Nazi-collaborating Vichy government in the 1940s. She even threw out her own father in 2015.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/l...macron-marine-le-pen-first-round-live-updates
 
Ya know, the Left and Democrats tell us to follow the science and consensus on things like Fauci Plague and Gorebal Warming, yet when it comes to how we do elections they want to do everything that virtually no other nation does because those nations don't want mass voter fraud... Why is that?
 
Hey stupid. The electoral college is written into our constitution. Mail-in ballots are not. THINK
They have been allowed for a long time, many things aren’t in the Constitution, that’s why it’s amended.

Absentee ballots were first used for the military during the American Civil War. Early absentee voting laws restricted the practice to members of the armed services. The first allowance for civilian absentee voting was in Vermont in 1896. By 1938, 42 states allowed absentee voting for civilians.

wzhDIC9UYsU1MAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki

[h=3]Postal voting in the United States - Wikipedia[/h]




 
What the hell does that have to do with voting in person, using voter ID, and eliminating things like mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, ballot drop boxes, and all the other squirrely shit the Democrats want for our elections?
Squirrelly only to those who want to make it harder for people to vote.
 
Text starts threads like an idiot from his den of stupidity and other rightys jump on board. I feel sorry that learning is beyond you guys. 36 states require voter ID now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter...of 2021, 36 states,an intent to reduce voting.
I suppose you rightys do not vote, otherwise you would know more about how it works.
When you register to vote you have to show ID. Then the election commission checks the validity. If they pass, they are assigned a precinct. They send a voters card and assign a precinct for you to vote. The name is listed in the voter's book in the precinct. When you go to the polls, your name is looked up. If not in the book, you do not vote.
 
Back
Top