Fraud as a matter of law.

[Jarod]

Never expect a MAGAt supporter to agree with a law that goes against Herr Trump.

They just spout bullshit that is not relevant. Its a real sickness. I always knew this type existed among us, I assumed they did not vote. The epidemic has gotten big enough to really harm our nation. We need more mental health care available and the sickness in our culture needs to be cured.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

They just spout bullshit that is not relevant. Its a real sickness. I always knew this type existed among us, I assumed they did not vote. The epidemic has gotten big enough to really harm our nation. We need more mental health care available and the sickness in our culture needs to be cured.

If they couldn't spout bullshit, what would they do? Admit the truth? LOL

 

[Damocles]

But believing that suggests a lack of mental health or intellectual intelligence that I thought was less common in our culture. The goal was not to stop him politically but for the rule of law to prevail. We all knew the indictments would have this effect politically, but justice is worth that.

I am simply shocked by the lack of reality so many Americans live in.

The Criminal justice system does not operate on politics, but on practicality and an attempt at justice.

These people are simply ignorant and I have a hard time accepting that.

There are people in law that disagree with you, they aren't in ignorance but they do think this is politically motivated. Believing that you have a high road to the "Truth In All Things" because your opinion doesn't meet with that of others whom you disdain doesn't make you right, it just makes you arrogant.

 

[Jarod]

There are people in law that disagree with you, they aren't in ignorance but they do think this is politically motivated. Believing that you have a high road to the "Truth In All Things" because your opinion doesn't meet with that of others whom you disdain doesn't make you right, it just makes you arrogant.

Generally, I agree with you, but not on this issue. Trump clearly violated the law. Being unable to see that, and I think you agree, is a result of ignorance about the law, or bias to the point of mental instability, or stupidity.

I understand that I know more about the law than most people, but I don’t go around telling scientists that they are purely political unless I’ve done my research.

 

[Jarod]

There are people in law that disagree with you, they aren't in ignorance but they do think this is politically motivated. Believing that you have a high road to the "Truth In All Things" because your opinion doesn't meet with that of others whom you disdain doesn't make you right, it just makes you arrogant.

Some lawyers are trying to gain notoriety or wealth by going around saying something they know it’s not true. Some lawyers are truly idiots. And some have a bias to the point of mental illness. I suspect a vast majority of lawyers could come to a consensus that the evidence of trumps crimes, constituted enough substance to rise way past, what is necessary for indictments.

Some scientists say Evolution is bunk, but a huge consensus will agree that it is clear to some level that evolution has and is taking place. I would question the bias, intelligence or mental stability of those who disagree.