Fox Republican Debate..

Mott the Hoople said:
I think that half way through the debate Democrats were smiling from ear to ear and high fiving each other. It's the one thing Jeb was straight on right about.
Click to expand...

Nothing more amusing than brain dead leftTards thinking that Democrats are winning and high fiving each other about it.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I would argue that the Bush-Kasich-Trump exchange on immigration was the biggest moment of the night and if the audience was really large, it really hurt the GOP brand. They have done little to dispel their image as the party of ignorant rednecks. The fact that Trumps racist populism is so appealing to the GOP base scares the hell out of a lot of mainstream voters.
Click to expand...

See you in 2016; a LOT of brain dead clueless Liberals like yourself who love wallowing in denial are going to be shell shocked.
 
cawacko said:
Kasich ruined himself last night. It's frustrating for everyone up there who would like to talk more but you can't whine like he did. I like the guy and was rooting for him but towards the end wanted him off the stage.

The pro-immigration responses got the far bigger responses from the audience than did the put up a wall and kicked them all out lines.
Click to expand...

Kasich was ruined from the start of his campaign because he sounds just like a Democrat.

Another person who will be joining Kasich on the trash heap of failed Republican campaigns will be Bobby Jindal; someone I liked right up, and until, he started attacking Republicans calling them part of the problem.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I would argue that the Bush-Kasich-Trump exchange on immigration was the biggest moment of the night and if the audience was really large, it really hurt the GOP brand. They have done little to dispel their image as the party of ignorant rednecks. The fact that Trumps racist populism is so appealing to the GOP base scares the hell out of a lot of mainstream voters.
Click to expand...

And don't forget he likes wounded vets.
 
Rana said:
You did say there was tons of stuff if we listened. I won't ask for the tons of stuff, but what was one idea that you feel was worth listening to that the candidates mentioned?
Click to expand...

Further proof you weren't watching OR, incapable of comprehending that which you watch without your leftTard filters on.

The primary Republican theme was; (1) fix our broken immigration system and stem the massive tide of illegals entering the country with the blessing of Liberal Democrats who see them as a voting constituency; (2) do something about the massive accumulation of debt compounded tenfold by the Obama Presidency; and (3) find ways to allow more Americans to keep what they have earned with the belief that they know better how to spend their money than brain dead economically clueless Democrats.
 
Rana said:
You did say there was tons of stuff if we listened. I won't ask for the tons of stuff, but what was one idea that you feel was worth listening to that the candidates mentioned?
Click to expand...

Trump's lack of policy depth, ESPECIALLY on foreign policy. When he started talking about Putin and the happenings in Syria he was clearly out of his element.

Not every question has to be an attacking gotcha question. Sometimes just letting a candidate speak on issues reveals more about them.

As for Rubio-Paul. Not unlike the Democrats there are different 'divisions' within the Republican Party. The Rubio-Paul exchange highlighted two of them on spending and foreign policy. It was laid out there for voters to see and they can choose based on that info.
 
cawacko said:
Trump's lack of policy depth, ESPECIALLY on foreign policy. When he started talking about Putin and the happenings in Syria he was clearly out of his element.

Not every question has to be an attacking gotcha question. Sometimes just letting a candidate speak on issues reveals more about them.

As for Rubio-Paul. Not unlike the Democrats there are different 'divisions' within the Republican Party. The Rubio-Paul exchange highlighted two of them on spending and foreign policy. It was laid out there for voters to see and they can choose based on that info.
Click to expand...

I guess for the uniformed it was tons of info, but for those of us who follow politics, we already knew their positions.

Trump lacks depth in everything, and this was obvious before the debates. I could see how it would be informative to the uninformed though.

Rubio has a hard time articulating his knowledge, he is not a good speaker, he looks uncomfortable. He will have trouble against someone as polished as Hillary.
 
Rana said:
You did say there was tons of stuff if we listened. I won't ask for the tons of stuff, but what was one idea that you feel was worth listening to that the candidates mentioned?
Click to expand...

you don't believe it is good to know what a candidate believes in before you vote for them?.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top