Fox News tells court reasonable viewers know Tucker Carlson is full of shit.

Earl said:
Tucker is so far ahead of you, intellectually, that you are invisible.
Click to expand...

Home schooling. ^^^^

I suggest "Tucker is so far ahead that he can't see you in his rearview mirror," or

"If you rose to Tucker's intellectual heights, your nose would bleed."

or "I'm illiterate swine so I feed my brain at the Fucker Carlson Fox News info bucket"

Your pick. :palm: Your metaphor doesn't fucking work..... Damn country people are stupid.
 
LV426 said:
I thought no one watched CNN? Weren't you just cheerleading Tucker's ratings earlier?
Click to expand...

I can look up show ratings without watching the shows... As for no one watching CNN... Well no one with an IQ over 40 does...

But again do the people who watch Carlson know that? Doesn't seem like it, does it?
Click to expand...

Why cherry pick just his show. As I pointed out, this goes for every talking head on cable news, not just Carlson.

And isn't that really cynically lazy; to sit there and spread bullshit and put the onus on the viewer to determine whether what you're saying is true?

Seems like a lowering of the bar and a race to the bottom. So it's no surprise you're right there with it, being the bottom-feeding ratlicker you are.
Click to expand...

Improper use of a semi-colon

grammar-nazi-meme.jpg


But that aside, no it isn't intellectually lazy. That would be viewers who don't critically--or otherwise--think about what's presented on these shows. A common one on them is to have segments where they've invited their fellow commentators on to give a second, "different," opinion that isn't different at all...

Oh, and thank you for the gratuitous insult, it was much more imaginative than the ones most of your fellow Leftists use.
 
dukkha said:
OK so his opinion is not always 100% factual? is that it?
He doesn't represent himself as a news source like Fake News does = what the problem?
Click to expand...

Well, opinions are opinions lol.

There isn’t a single pundit—I don’t care who they are, that doesn’t get a little loose with the facts from time to time. It’s the nature of the beast. Here’s the point though: some are worse than others.

Tucker gets a solid B in that category. What’s going on here is the lefties loathe him—for obvious reasons, and they’d like nothing better than to get rid of him. And apparently he’s squeaky clean because he’s not been #MeToo’d yet.

Yet.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
But that aside, no it isn't intellectually lazy. That would be viewers who don't critically--or otherwise--think about what's presented on these shows.
Click to expand...

Gee, from where could viewers get the impression that Fox News is news? Hmmm. Geee. I wonder...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
A common one on them is to have segments where they've invited their fellow commentators on to give a second, "different," opinion that isn't different at all...
Click to expand...

But they never do that, and Fox does not employ any kind of Fairness Doctrine.

In fact, Hannity literally got rid of his partner so he could have a show to himself and his perspective.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Oh, and thank you for the gratuitous insult, it was much more imaginative than the ones most of your fellow Leftists use.
Click to expand...

And it's one I'm sure you or one of your allies here will steal, just like you all steal everything else from me because you're a hack.
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, opinions are opinions lol.

There isn’t a single pundit—I don’t care who they are, that doesn’t get a little loose with the facts from time to time. It’s the nature of the beast. Here’s the point though: some are worse than others.

Tucker gets a solid B in that category. What’s going on here is the lefties loathe him—for obvious reasons, and they’d like nothing better than to get rid of him. And apparently he’s squeaky clean because he’s not been #MeToo’d yet.

Yet.
Click to expand...

So "Fox News" should be called "Fox Lies".
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, opinions are opinions lol.

There isn’t a single pundit—I don’t care who they are, that doesn’t get a little loose with the facts from time to time. It’s the nature of the beast. Here’s the point though: some are worse than others.

Tucker gets a solid B in that category. What’s going on here is the lefties loathe him—for obvious reasons, and they’d like nothing better than to get rid of him. And apparently he’s squeaky clean because he’s not been #MeToo’d yet.

Yet.
Click to expand...
I forgive him the occasional over-reach, considering the piles of fake news disguised as "journalism"
by the Biden Press.. He's been really good on covering the riots as well, barely mentioned by the Biden Press

Tucker is the only person who has on non-Russiaphobes like Steven Cohen, and the Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel
Those are important to show Cold War 2.0 is not a given
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You used literally wrong.
Click to expand...

No I didn't, idiot.

"Fox News tells court reasonable viewers know Tucker Carlson is full of shit."

See? Literally right there in the subject of the OP.

Why are you pretending you're smart or literate? We both know you're not. So what gives? Do I make you feel so insecure that you have to reach into your bag of idiocy to try and make yourself look less foolish and stupid?

Cuz that strategy ain't working.
 
LV426 said:
No I didn't, idiot.

"Fox News tells court reasonable viewers know Tucker Carlson is full of shit."

See? Literally right there in the subject of the OP.

Why are you pretending you're smart or literate? We both know you're not. So what gives? Do I make you feel so insecure that you have to reach into your bag of idiocy to try and make yourself look less foolish and stupid?

Cuz that strategy ain't working.
Click to expand...

Fox News is the subject.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
douchememe
Click to expand...

Ah, so what we have here is a case of Schroedinger's Douchebag: One who makes douchebag statements, particularly sexist, racist or otherwise bigoted ones, then decides whether they were “just joking”, "being sarcastic", or dead serious based on the responses of other people.
 
In short the media may lie with impunity because the standard for malice is too onerous. You can recklessly call someone an extortionist,
and no firm takes more advantage of the right to lie to citizens US Free speech law affords as does Fox bullshit mountain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top