Fourth manufactured Democrat hoax unanimousy obliterated by appeals court

[artichoke]

Purest denial, which is all you've ever got.

Provably false projection, as usual. It's right here fore everyone to see. StonebyStone humiliated himself trying to "debunk" a tiny fraction of the list and responded by refusing to read the counterpoint that handed him his ass. THAT'S how he "debunked" it.

Next lie please.

He's well on his way to destroying the Republican party by bringing its corruption into the open.

Yeah, about Democrats and their hilarious track record on predictions...

View attachment 14265
.
View attachment 14266
.
View attachment 14267
.
View attachment 14268
.
View attachment 14269

 

[artichoke]

President Trump was exonerated...Constitutionally.

Case closed.

Funny how continuing to cite such a simple fact leaves the hyperventilating crybullies of the left completely traumatized and losing their shit.

 

[artichoke]

Funny, Trump promised that he was going to fund his own campaign. Yet he's out there begging for campaign contributions, a lot of which are probably coming from people and companies that are going to expect something in return.

Ah, the familiar game of pretending that standard practice in Washington is suddenly somehow scandalous because Trump's doing it.

Given Trump's history, they'll probably get it. And it won't be stuff that benefits you or me.

Yes, given his history of being the first president in generations to consistently represent the American people for once instead of the elitist establishment swamp that stabs them in the back at every turn...HE'LL be the president that's for sale to special interests. Do you even hear yourself?

 

[artichoke]

You mean accept corruption like mindless Trump cultists.

Um...no, I mean accepting debunked smear campaigns, witch hunts, and treasonous coup attempts like mindless Democrat crybullies. Try to keep up.

View attachment 14270

It was a fake trial from the very beginning.

Not according to the Constitution.

Only the conspiracy theorists of the lunatic Democrat fringe think that.

Why do you hate America?

Hear that Earl? The people who burn our flag, ban our Pledge, spit on our Anthem, tear down our monuments, and shred the Constitution for Democrat power want to know why those who defend the country against their non-stop treason "hate America."

 

[artichoke]

I already debunked your copy paste here.

Since you won't stop telling this lie, here is you getting your ass handed to you when you tried to "debunk" the list by tossing up some laughably weak misinformation and garbage logic at a tiny fraction of the examples, all of which got immediately destroyed...to which you responded by running away.

THAT is how you "debunked" the list.

View attachment 14271

 

[StoneByStone]

Since you won't stop telling this lie, here is you getting your ass handed to you when you tried to "debunk" the list by tossing up some laughably weak misinformation and garbage logic at a tiny fraction of the examples, all of which got immediately destroyed...to which you responded by running away.

THAT is how you "debunked" the list.

View attachment 14271

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I already debunked your copy paste here.

did you copy/paste any evidence?.....

 

[StoneByStone]

did you copy/paste any evidence?.....

I think I did the first time. The second time, I asked which claims he disagreed with, so I could post evidence for that, but he refused to answer.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

No, I picked the first three, that way it was fair. I didn't just pick the easiest ones to debunk.

the first three?....

-the Russia collusion hoax,
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax,
-the Covington Catholic hoax,

how on earth did you "debunk" those?.....
did you find some evidence that no one claimed there was Russian collusion?.....

 

[Moosakofsky]

Funny, Trump promised that he was going to fund his own campaign. Yet he's out there begging for campaign contributions, a lot of which are probably coming from people and companies that are going to expect something in return. Given Trump's history, they'll probably get it. And it won't be stuff that benefits you or me.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

He got no help from anybody except grass roots donations in 2016. Even the RNC was against him. Goes to show he's proven himself. Truly historic and amazing against all odds.

 

[artichoke]

So let's review:

1) You got caught lying about "debunking" a list that you admittedly only even TRIED (terribly, I might add) to debunk a tiny fraction of...before getting your ass handed to you and fleeing the debate in defeat.

2) Then you avoided the debate about your lying by inventing a bunch of phony diversions and frivolous challenges for ME to DISPROVE YOUR lie (that's not how evidence works, YOU have to PROVE YOUR arguments).

3) Then I STILL proved that you lied from the beginning (even though the burden was on YOU to PROVE YOUR lie), and now you again posture and pretend away your defeat.

I rest my case. Lying scumbag to the bitter end.

 

[StoneByStone]

the first three?....


how on earth did you "debunk" those?.....
did you find some evidence that no one claimed there was Russian collusion?.....

Well I pointed out that, according to the Mueller Report, Trump accepted the offer of help from the Russian government in the election. There was also the "secret meeting" and the actual interference by Russia that followed.

 

[artichoke]

the first three?....


how on earth did you "debunk" those?.....
did you find some evidence that no one claimed there was Russian collusion?.....

He didn't. He tried and got obliterated and said he was refusing to read the rebuttal.

It's all right here.

Well I pointed out that, according to the Mueller Report, Trump accepted the offer of help from the Russian government in the election. There was also the "secret meeting" and the actual interference by Russia that followed.

Which in no way "debunks" the notion that Democrats colluding with Russia to manufacture a fraudulent smear campaign, doctor evidence, lie to a federal judge, illegally spy, and treasonously hijack an election while falsely exonerating Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton constitutes it being a hoax. And the Mueller Report concluded that there was no evidence of criminal collusion...after two years of power-abusing witch hunts, erroneous persecutions, and straight-up torture to get people to confess to things that didn't happen.

Total BS. It doesn't debunk the Russia hoax being a hoax now, and it didn't when you previously tried to resurrect your debunked conspiracy theory with more lies.

 

[artichoke]

He got no help from anybody except grass roots donations in 2016. Even the RNC was against him. Goes to show he's proven himself. Truly historic and amazing against all odds.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Well I pointed out that, according to the Mueller Report, Trump accepted the offer of help from the Russian government in the election. There was also the "secret meeting" and the actual interference by Russia that followed.

Mueller says you're a lying cunt.....sorry, I've actually read the Mueller report so I know he said he found no evidence of collusion on the part of anyone in Trump's campaign......go suck eggs.....

 

[StoneByStone]

Mueller says you're a lying cunt.....sorry, I've actually read the Mueller report so I know he said he found no evidence of collusion on the part of anyone in Trump's campaign......go suck eggs.....

So you know that the Mueller Report says Trump accepted Russia's offer of help, that a "secret meeting" was held, and that Russia interfered in the election, correct?

 

[artichoke]

So you know that the Mueller Report says Trump accepted Russia's offer of help, that a "secret meeting" was held, and that Russia interfered in the election, correct?

Correction:

-Accepting intel on his opponents' crimes co-exists with Mueller also saying there was no evidence of collusion because accepting intel is standard practice and not criminal collusion. Literally every campaign, including Obama-Biden, reaches out to sources who keep telling them that they've got dirt on their opponents...even foreign sources (Hillary and Obama even took it a step further and colluded with Russia to MANUFACTURE now-debunked dirt on their opponents, but nothing wrong with THAT), as with Bill Clinton and the UK, and Obama-Biden with the Ukraine. It's only controversial when someone other than Democrats does it.

-If secret meetings constituted guilt of anything, then it is a settled fact that Hillary was guilty (remember the secret tarmac meeting between Hillary's husband and the Obama official overseeing the 'investigation' into her?), and everyone Joseph McCarthy ever accused of being a communist spy officially IS one, because that's the one thing he could always prove...that they met with other communists. See how your hypocritical dishonesty backfires when applied to both sides?

-Russia TRIED UNSUCCESSFULLY to help Bernie Sanders, Trump, and others.

Try again, dishonest demagogue.

 

[StoneByStone]

Correction:

-Accepting intel on his opponents' crimes co-exists with Mueller also saying there was no evidence of collusion because accepting intel is standard practice and not criminal collusion. Literally every campaign, including Obama-Biden, reaches out to sources who keep telling them that they've got dirt on their opponents...even foreign sources (Hillary and Obama even took it a step further and colluded with Russia to MANUFACTURE now-debunked dirt on their opponents, but nothing wrong with THAT), as with Bill Clinton and the UK, and Obama-Biden with the Ukraine. It's only controversial when someone other than Democrats does it.

-If secret meetings constituted guilt of anything, then it is a settled fact that Hillary was guilty (remember the secret tarmac meeting between Hillary's husband and the Obama official overseeing the 'investigation' into her?), and everyone Joseph McCarthy ever accused of being a communist spy officially IS one, because that's the one thing he could always prove...that they met with other communists. See how your hypocritical dishonesty backfires when applied to both sides?

-Russia TRIED UNSUCCESSFULLY to help Bernie Sanders, Trump, and others.

Try again, dishonest demagogue.

I didn't say it was "criminal collusion." This is how Trumpcucks move the goalposts.
And your bringing up Hillary is #whataboutism, another common tactic of Fascists.

This is all Trumpcucks do on this forum to defend the orange retard. "It was bad, but it wasn't as bad as it could have been, and some Democrat probably did it too."

And nobody is saying Trump colluded with Russia because he met with Russians. We're saying he colluded with Russia because the Russian government offered him help, he accepted, and then met with Russian agents. Comparing that to McCarthyism is ridiculous.
Trump also met with Germans, but nobody is accusing him of colluding with the German government, because we understand that there is a difference between the German government and German people.

 

[artichoke]

I didn't say it was "criminal collusion."

Step 1: Claim the Russia "investigation" wasn't a hoax.

Step 2: Get confronted on the total lack of evidence and shown that every other president does this without it even raising an eyebrow.

Step 3: Act like you weren't trying to defend the Russia "investigation."

This is how Trumpcucks move the goalposts.

Don't pretend to "debunk" the Russian collusion hoax and people won't have to "move the goalposts" by proving that it was based on nothing.

And your bringing up Hillary is #whataboutism

Don't hold Trump to a different standard than everyone else and people won't have to point it out...which obviously isn't #whataboutism, as with the last forty times you repeated this obvious falsehood.

another common tactic of Fascists.

Says the Jew-hating demagogue caught lying at every turn.

This is all Trumpcucks do on this forum to defend the orange retard.

The natural consequence of Constitution-shredding leftist traitors only using this forum to attack him.

"It was bad, but it wasn't as bad as it could have been, and some Democrat probably did it too."

Don't spend four years straight endlessly hyperventilating over every non-controversy under the Sun and people won't have to explain the difference between mildly inappropriate behavior and the hysterical "crimes against our democracy" nonsense that you ridiculous lying demagogues try to manufacture against Trump...or to explain that every president did far worse versions of these acts without anyone even caring.

See how that works? Don't be a flaming hypocrite and people will stop noticing and pointing it out.

And nobody is saying Trump colluded with Russia because he met with Russians. We're saying he colluded with Russia because the Russian government offered him help, he accepted, and then met with Russian agents.

Which co-exists with even a biased hack like Mueller admitting that there was no evidence of collusion...which any rational human being would notice is a huge red flag that something is wrong with this false narrative. And again, this is against the backdrop of Democrats not only COLLUDING with multiple foreign governments, but using them to MANUFACTURE fake evidence against their opponents to rig elections. But this is perfectly fine and Trump committing jaywalking is treason.

Absolutely idiotic on its face.

Comparing that to McCarthyism is ridiculous.

Except for the part about inventing hoax after hoax to falsely persecute people with smear campaigns, witch hunts, and treasonous coup attempts, sure.

Trump also met with Germans, but nobody is accusing him of colluding with the German government, because we understand that there is a difference between the German government and German people.

But you DON'T understand that meeting with government officials does not constitute guilt of anything either. Except when Hillary's husband secretly meets with the Democrat overseeing the "investigation" into her 100+ already proven felonies on a tarmac...THAT is perfectly legit.

 

[Earl]

Exoneration is forever.