Former Swiss Intelligence Officer blows the whistle on West's Ukraine War Narrative

Answer the fucking question or stop wasting my time.
Okay...I will make it even easier for you:

True or false?
The VAST majority of the people inside the LPR, DPR and Crimea (pre-February 24) did NOT want to be part of Ukraine.
True or False?


I don't know the fucking answer.

The only remotely independent figures I have seen are from a survey by Pew Research Center in 2014, after Putin annexed Crimea but before the troubles in Mariupol and other places. They found that in eastern Ukraine 58% of Russian speakers wanted the country to remain united, while 27% thought regions should be allowed to secede if they wished.
Read about it here:
https://web.archive.org/web/2014050...es-Ukraine-Russia-Report-FINAL-May-8-2014.pdf

Are all the Russian speakers and the vast majority of Ukrainian speakers in the Donbas now pro-Russian? It’s not impossible, I suppose. :dunno:

Even Russia's elections results don't say that 100% voted to join Russia in any of the regions, though it was certainly fairly close in Donetsk and Lugansk. I definitely believe that ethnic russians and/or russian speakers in eastern Ukraine have soured on Kyiv over the past 8 years. For Donetsk and Lugansk, the region should be obvious- I think we can agree that no one wants their loved ones being bombed in their homes while one's alleged President says things like this:

As you pointed out, Mariupol is part of Donetsk region and from what I've seen, the only reason they weren't part of the DPR before Russia started its military operation is because of the brutal tactics employed by Kyiv before then. If you're interested in taking a look at the tactics employed, I highly recommend watching RT's documentary on the subject:
Mariupol: A Homecoming | RT


Btw, the scammers didn’t get anything out of me last weekend, it was just aggravation.

Glad to hear it :-)
 
I don't know the fucking answer.

The only remotely independent figures I have seen are from a survey by Pew Research Center in 2014, after Putin annexed Crimea but before the troubles in Mariupol and other places. They found that in eastern Ukraine 58% of Russian speakers wanted the country to remain united, while 27% thought regions should be allowed to secede if they wished.
Read about it here:
https://web.archive.org/web/2014050...es-Ukraine-Russia-Report-FINAL-May-8-2014.pdf

Are all the Russian speakers and the vast majority of Ukrainian speakers in the Donbas now pro-Russian? It’s not impossible, I suppose. :dunno:

Okay.

I posted poll after poll, from differing sources, that showed the VAST majority of all residents of Crimea wanted nothing to do with Kiev.

And I showed (in this thread) how Kiev had killed over 3,000 innocent LPK/DPK residents since April 2014...for daring to vote overwhelmingly to leave Ukraine.
Plus, according to your own chart, most of those residents are of Russian decent.
Obviously, they would not want anything to do with Kiev...especially after the latter murdered thousands of them and destroyed much of their infrastructure.

But, whatever.

Btw, the scammers didn’t get anything out of me last weekend, it was just aggravation. Thanks for asking.

How can I ask you about something, that I know nothing about?
 
I don't see any reason to be upset with Tranquillus here. It's true he didn't answer your question, and I think it's fine to point that out, but he also raised an important question of his own, namely what do the people of Mariupol think about joining Russia. I imagine many may not be aware of the fact that before Russia taking control of it, the Ukrainian military had taken control of it after Euromaidan in 2014. They killed off a fair amount of the Mariupol police force at the time too. Some may refuse to take a look simply because it was produced by Russia's RT network, but I think that their documentary on Mariupol's recent history is educational. It can be seen here:

Mariupol: A Homecoming | RT

Here's their description of the documentary:

**
Some are miners, some guards. Here is a journalist. Press. Drivers, electricians. I worked in Moscow for 11 years. Came home on the 24th [February 2022]. And then straight down here. I was supposed to work at DonTech,” a Donbass militiaman in the Mariupol suburbs recalls. He and his comrades in arms are getting ready to enter the city. Most of the Donbass militiamen are ordinary people. They never had combat training or military experience. However, they are prepared to risk their lives to stop Ukrainian nationalists from taking their land. During the battle for Mariupol, the Donbass militia fought alongside the Russian Army to liberate the city. These people went through fierce combat to save civilians locked in their houses by Ukrainian nationalists. See the Mariupol battlefield from their perspective in our new film.
**

First he vaguely suggests that the 2014 referendums were nonsense - which almost the entire West has done (including the ever-increasingly, useless MSM).
This is blatantly untrue.
Which I showed.

After I do that?
He asks me some, unrelated question about Mariopol...which is not even in the DPK.
He might as well ask me about Lviv.
Then when I ask him a simple question...boldly?
He skips over it completely and blathers on about something else.


The fact that most in the West are COMPLETELY clueless about the real situation in Ukraine - since 2014?
Is a large part of why so many of the ignorant masses support the West dumping shit loads of arms into Ukraine.
And painting Russia as the bad guys...since 2014.
Whilst taking the world to the brink of nuclear war.
Over a battle that is NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

Plus, NATO promised Russia that they would NEVER enter, former Warsaw Pact countries.
And now they wanted to go into Ukraine...which used to be part of the USSR.
No wonder the Russians were skittish.
They have been invaded by almost every, major power in the world over the last 230 years - America, Canada, GB (during the civil war), Germany (twice), France, Japan and on and on.


Since February 24th, 2022?
Russia ARE - obviously - the bad guys. BIG time!!!

But from April 2014 until Putin did his INSANELY, stupid thing and invaded Ukraine proper?
Kiev WERE the bad guys.
Destroying cities and killing, thousands of innocent civilians who wanted nothing more to do with Kiev...which had just been overthrown by a US-backed coup.

And I don't give a shit what Kiev's law was on leaving their country.
If 80+% of a people in a region want to leave?
Whether it is here in America or over in Ukraine or in ANY nation?
They should be allowed to go (barring military settlements AND if they take their share of the national debt on a per capita basis).
Kiev had no right to destroy the regions that wanted to leave.
And they would have done the same to Crimea had the Russians not had a huge military presence their at Sevastopol already.

I have little patience on chat forums.
They are almost, totally FULL of trolls and/or closed minded idiots who haven't got the brains/guts to openly show that they might be wrong about their opinions on things.
Out of some childish pride.
And hide behind their computers/phones as they type out bile and blather to vent their stresses of the day.
Like the useless saps that they (mostly) really are.

However, if I over reacted?
I apologize.


With respect, Mariopol is irrelevant.
It was destroyed.
It's people - scattered to the wind.
It is impossible to now know where the residents stand.
As it will be until long after the war is over.
Only when things have calmed down for many months can true referendums/polls be taken.
Once the people feel safe.

And the funny thing is - the West freaks out that Russia destroyed it.
Yet they do not condemn Kiev for not calling it an 'open city' to save it's destruction and all the needless deaths.
How the Fuck is an advancing army supposed to take a city that refuses to declare itself 'open'?
Ask nicely and hope they let them in?

IN WW2?
France declared Paris an open city to spare it from German destruction.
And it worked.
Kiev should have done the same thing with every city of theirs that Russia tried to take.
Just as Russia should with Kherson, now that they are leaving it.
 
Last edited:
I don't see any reason to be upset with Tranquillus here. It's true he didn't answer your question, and I think it's fine to point that out, but he also raised an important question of his own, namely what do the people of Mariupol think about joining Russia. I imagine many may not be aware of the fact that before Russia taking control of it, the Ukrainian military had taken control of it after Euromaidan in 2014. They killed off a fair amount of the Mariupol police force at the time too. Some may refuse to take a look simply because it was produced by Russia's RT network, but I think that their documentary on Mariupol's recent history is educational. It can be seen here:

Mariupol: A Homecoming | RT

Here's their description of the documentary:

**
Some are miners, some guards. Here is a journalist. Press. Drivers, electricians. I worked in Moscow for 11 years. Came home on the 24th [February 2022]. And then straight down here. I was supposed to work at DonTech,” a Donbass militiaman in the Mariupol suburbs recalls. He and his comrades in arms are getting ready to enter the city. Most of the Donbass militiamen are ordinary people. They never had combat training or military experience. However, they are prepared to risk their lives to stop Ukrainian nationalists from taking their land. During the battle for Mariupol, the Donbass militia fought alongside the Russian Army to liberate the city. These people went through fierce combat to save civilians locked in their houses by Ukrainian nationalists. See the Mariupol battlefield from their perspective in our new film.
**


First he vaguely suggests that the 2014 referendums were nonsense - which almost the entire West has done (including the ever-increasingly, useless MSM).
This is blatantly untrue.
Which I showed.

Ah ok. I agree. My favourite go to article on the Crimea referendum is one from Canadian American journalist Eva Bartlett, this one:
Return to Russia: Crimeans tell the real story of the 2014 Referendum and their lives since | Mint Press News


I don't have one that focuses on the 2014 Donbass referendums, but I think that Bartlett's article on the DPR (admittedly only half of the Donbass regions) prior to Russia's military operation in Ukraine was good as well:
Under fire from Ukraine and misperceived by the west, the people of the DPR share their stories | Mint Press News


After I do that? He asks me some, unrelated question about Mariopol...which is not even in the DPK.

I don't know about it being unrelated, though I could agree that it dodged the main thrust of your argument in favour of what I believe appeared to be more favourable ground. Technically, as he pointed it out, it is now part of the DPR, or whatever Russia's calling the part of Donetsk region that it controls, and it was always in Donetsk region. I think we can agree that the -reason- it wasn't in the DPR until Russia's military operation is educational as well.

The fact that most in the West are COMPLETELY clueless about the real situation in Ukraine - since 2014?
Is a large part of why so many of the ignorant masses support the West dumping shit loads of arms into Ukraine.

Agreed. I posted excerpts of part of the article in the opening post so often in another forum due to people's clear ignorance of the situation prior to Russia's military operation that I actually got a no points warning for spam in another forum. I should have just focused on a thread I'd made based on this article as I've done here and then I can just refer people to the original post if they go on with the usual argument that Russia had no legitimate reason for starting their military operation in Ukraine.

And painting Russia as the bad guys...since 2014.
Whilst taking the world to the brink of nuclear war.
Over a battle that is NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

Due to the U.S.' involvement in Ukraine, especially 2014 and onward, I'd say that Americans thinking it's none of their business is like suggesting that the Iran Contra scandal was none of the U.S. business. There are several articles that get into the details, such as this one:
The Mess that Nuland Made | Consortium News

The U.S. played an integral part in getting Ukraine to where it is today. I think it behooves the American government to at least try to end the hostilities, but instead I'd say that they're just fanning the flames, focusing on sending Ukraine an astounding amount of military aid to continue fighting while spending almost no time in trying to find a diplomatic solution to the war.

Plus, NATO promised Russia that they would NEVER enter, former Warsaw Pact countries.

Agreed. The U.S. certainly didn't engender any trust by backtracking on that.

And now they wanted to go into Ukraine...which used to be part of the USSR.
No wonder the Russians were skittish.
They have been invaded by almost every, major power in the world over the last 230 years - America, Canada, GB (during the civil war), Germany (twice), France, Japan and on and on.

Yeah, Russia had good reason to believe that Ukraine becoming a NATO nation would be a security threat to them, particularly given the fact that they've been killing Ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine for the past 8 years.


Since February 24th, 2022?
Russia ARE - obviously - the bad guys. BIG time!!!

Here we disagree. If Ukraine hadn't started a renewed assault just days before Russia started its military operation, I'd be much more hesistant to consider Russia having a legitimate reason for starting its military operation, but due to Ukraine started said assault, I can understand why Putin decided to give the green light to Russia's lower house of Parliament to recognize the DPR and LPR on February 21st. It may even be that Putin was hoping that simply recognizing them would get Ukraine to stop attacking these republics and only after they continued their assault did he decided to start his military operation on February 24th to defend these Republics from the assault.

But from April 2014 until Putin did his INSANELY, stupid thing and invaded Ukraine proper?
Kiev WERE the bad guys.
Destroying cities and killing, thousands of innocent civilians who wanted nothing more to do with Kiev...which had just been overthrown by a US-backed coup.

Other than the bit on Putin, I agree.

And I don't give a shit what Kiev's law was on leaving their country.
If 80+% of a people in a region want to leave?
Whether it is here in America or over in Ukraine or in ANY nation?
They should be allowed to go (barring military settlements AND if they take their share of the national debt on a per capita basis).
Kiev had no right to destroy the regions that wanted to leave.
And they would have done the same to Crimea had the Russians not had a huge military presence their at Sevastopol already.

Agreed.

I have little patience on chat forums.
They are almost, totally FULL of trolls and/or closed minded idiots who haven't got the brains/guts to openly show that they might be wrong about their opinions on things.
Out of some childish pride.
And hide behind their computers/phones as they type out bile and blather to vent their stresses of the day.
Like the useless saps that they (mostly) really are.

I think I'm probably a tad kinder when it comes to posters, lol :-p. Generally speaking, I tend to butt heads with moderators more than posters, as posters can only do what moderators allow them to do. I really like the feature here that you can thread ban people you don't want in your threads and moderators will even consider doing a thread ban after the fact, at least for newbies like me that didn't know the nature of certain posters before posting here. It lightens the load on moderators and empowers posters at the same time.

However, if I over reacted?
I apologize.

Sounds good to me :-)

With respect, Mariopol is irrelevant.
It was destroyed.
It's people - scattered to the wind.
It is impossible to now know where the residents stand.

I think that the RT documentary I linked to previously makes a good attempt. I read an article from a Ukrainian reporter that painted a very different picture, but from what I've read from both sides, I think that RT's documentary is more accurate on the whole.

As it will be until long after the war is over.
Only when things have calmed down for many months can true referendums/polls be taken.
Once the people feel safe.

Well, I don't think that Russia would mind holding new elections if it'd finally put the matter of who these contested regions should be governed by to rest.

And the funny thing is - the West freaks out that Russia destroyed it.
Yet they do not condemn Kiev for not calling it an 'open city' to save it's destruction and all the needless deaths.
How the Fuck is an advancing army supposed to take a city that refuses to declare itself 'open'?
Ask nicely and hope they let them in?

Agreed. I think what would have been best is if Ukraine hadn't sent in its military to "quell" unrest in the city back in 2014 and instead tried to find a diplomatic solution.


IN WW2?
France declared Paris an open city to spare it from German destruction.
And it worked.

Smart.

Kiev should have done the same thing with every city of theirs that Russia tried to take.
Just as Russia should with Kherson, now that they are leaving it.

The fact that they're leaving it is perhaps more important than declaring it open I'd think. I also appreciate the efforts Russia made in evacuating the civilian population prior to leaving Kherson. Would have been nice if Ukraine had done the same with various cities Russia eventually took, Mariupol perhaps being the most dramatic example.
 
Back
Top