Former AG Barr says he wouldn't have prosecuted Trump for Jan. 6 or taking classifie

BartenderElite said:
He looked at more evidence than anyone. Nice try though.

Again - thanks for this thread.
Click to expand...
At that time yes but not now. But nice try.

Sorta like a Judge deciding a case before the defense presents its whole case.

You are welcome and if you behave yourself I will allow you to participate in my next thread too.
 
ExpressLane said:
At that time yes but not now. But nice try.
Click to expand...

He looked at everything. So did Trump's own DHS, which said it was the most secure election in American history.

Great thread. Glad that you see his opinion as 100% valid. The Big Lie - as we have all known - is just that. A big lie. Trump just hates losing.
 
BartenderElite said:
He also said that Trump lost his temper when he told him the election was fine, and wouldn't even listen. He basically let Barr go after that.

Which shows that Trump didn't care about the facts or what anyone who didn't support the Big Lie had to say. It's really telling, actually.

But again - I'm glad the right now sees him as a credible source. No one looked into the election more than he did, and he said it was totally secure.
Click to expand...
It also shows Trump knew that Barr could not have possibly seen all the evidence yet.
 
BartenderElite said:
He looked at everything. So did Trump's own DHS, which said it was the most secure election in American history.

Great thread. Glad that you see his opinion as 100% valid. The Big Lie - as we have all known - is just that. A big lie. Trump just hates losing.
Click to expand...
Oh really? You think he had time to investigate and study every county in all fifty states for evidence of fraud. He must be a speed reader :laugh: Again I think he hadn't seen all the evidence so his statement was technically correct at the time. But yes I think Barr is correct about 1/6 . Do you like losing?
 
ExpressLane said:
Oh really? You think he had time to investigate and study every county in all fifty states for evidence of fraud. He must be a speed reader :laugh: Again I think he hadn't seen all the evidence so his statement was technically correct at the time. But yes I think Barr is correct about 1/6 . Do you like losing?
Click to expand...

I don't like it, but it's part of political life. Conservatives should just accept that they lost in 2020 instead of coming up w/ a bunch of lies that the OAG and DHS under Trump both rejected.
 
ExpressLane said:
It also shows Trump knew that Barr could not have possibly seen all the evidence yet.
Click to expand...

Can you cite any of the evidence, btw?

Because I have some. Fake electors, a phone call from a sitting President asking an election official to "find" more votes for him, pressure on the VP to overturn the results, etc.

Do you have any? Aside from "suitcases under the tables...full of ballots!"

Where is that Kraken we heard so much about?
 
ExpressLane said:
Man you guys have lost your love for Barr quick. You guys loved him when said "He hadn't seen" any evidence of voter fraud. And yes I think his ability to provide a valid legal opinion is better than a highly partisan 1/6 committee. And I thought Democrats were against fat shaming people. Go figure.:dunno:
Click to expand...
Nobody loved Barr at any time. Some were surprised that he finally told the truth about something, but he knew he was out the door in January.
 
ExpressLane said:
I guess this means the Dems can hate Barr again.
Click to expand...
he was just on FOX report
He laid into The "Russian colluion" crap.
Barr said Trump wanted to negotiate with Putin but it was politically impossible

"as a result Putin could not get his security concerns addressed,and Trump couldn't get Putin to commit
stay out of Ukraine" ( Donbas excepted)

Which is exactly what happened.

The Barr said:
"Biden's Afghan pullout showed Putin Biden was not able to control events where his own personnel was involved"

So Putin was frozen out of negotiations by the Russian Hoax, and he saw Biden was too weak to deal with
 
dukkha said:
he was just on FOX report
He laid into The "Russian colluion" crap. Barr said Trump wanted to negotiate with Putin but it was politically impossible
"as a result Putin could not get his security concerns addressed,and Trump couldn't get Putin to commit
stay out of Ukraine" ( Donbas excepted)

Which is exactly what happened.

The Barr said:
"Biden's Afghan pullout showed Putin Biden was not able to control events where his own personnel was involved"

So Putin was frozen out of negotiations by the Russian Hoax, and he saw Biden was too weak to deal with
Click to expand...
Pretty much spot on.
 
dukkha said:
he was just on FOX report
He laid into The "Russian colluion" crap.
Barr said Trump wanted to negotiate with Putin but it was politically impossible

"as a result Putin could not get his security concerns addressed,and Trump couldn't get Putin to commit
stay out of Ukraine" ( Donbas excepted)

Which is exactly what happened.

The Barr said:
"Biden's Afghan pullout showed Putin Biden was not able to control events where his own personnel was involved"

So Putin was frozen out of negotiations by the Russian Hoax, and he saw Biden was too weak to deal with
Click to expand...

Life is a hoax.
 
ExpressLane said:
As I predicted right on QUE the Libratards begin their hate
Click to expand...
they love him because he said Trump had some oversight over 1/6.
But they hate him because he shows how damaging their Russian Collusion was to the entire country

He also slams the Progs as radial left
 
Barr can write all the books and appear on all the news and talk shows he wants ... he'll NEVER wash off the stink of his deplorable actions under Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top