Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

So that its veracity can be verified independently.

You're not going to get that verification in a couple hours of testimony before a partisan Senate Committee.

I don't understand why you're so opposed to having the FBI investigate this. If you're so convinced she's a liar, then you will get to spike the football after the investigation clears Brett.

What have you got to lose? Don't understand this position you have.

Because as you've admitted; this is about VENGENCE and there's nothing to show that liberals will vote in his favor, even when it's shown that Ford is a lying DNC toady.
 
Ford's account is the proof.

She took a lie detector.

He refuses.

It's obvious why.


So a good story is all it takes for you to believe. No wonder you voted for a unqualified nigger in 2008 and 2012. Someone told you a story that he was qualified and you believe it. It's obvious why.
 
Please list 10 questions the FBI should ask them based on the information we know

1. Go fuck yourself.
2. Go fuck yourself.
3. Go fuck yourself.
4. Go fuck yourself.
5. Go fuck yourself.
6. Go fuck yourself.
7. Go fuck yourself.
8. Go fuck yourself.
9. Go fuck yourself.
10. Take your entitlement and shove it up your fat ass...if you can fit it up there with your head.
 
LV cares nothing about American law

And there you have it everyone.

LV cares nothing about American law and wants to have laws that are standard in LV's country, which is not American; because LV is not an American. :palm:

And now there's another liberal prickdicktion to save - Thanks. :D

You're the one who makes up shit about the law, like how policemen are prosecutors.

I've never said or implied any such thing; but I expected nothing but lies from a foreign agitator, like you. :D
 
I thought you were complaining because Garland was not given a hearing and vote. Now you are arguing the people need a voice. Partisanship dictating your feelings?

Not mine...you're the ones who made this process partisan with what you did to Garland.

Now that the shoe's on the other foot, suddenly you're finding yourself in the unenviable position of having to eat a plate of your own bullshit.

You're the ones who changed the SCOTUS process and made it politically-based on elections. That's what you wanted.

Now, you seem to be signing a different tune.


otomayor and Kagan had the votes, Garland did not. That is the job of the whips (and media) to count the votes in advance. If they don't have the votes they usually delay or cancel. If Garland had the votes the committee could have voted to call for hearings.

Jesus fucking Christ...

YOU DON'T NEED VOTES FOR A SENATE COMMITTEE HEARING OF A NOMINEE. All they vote on is to send his nomination to the Senate. They don't convene a vote to vote on having a hearing.

So you're lying either because you don't know the details, or you do and are acting in bad faith.

So which is it? Are you an ignoramus, or an asshole?
 
They don't get to vote without hearing from the American people this close to an election.

That's the excuse you all used for Garland.

Time for you to eat that plate of shit.

OH; but they will and there's nothing you can do about it, except to continue to cry. :D
 
1. Go fuck yourself.
2. Go fuck yourself.
3. Go fuck yourself.
4. Go fuck yourself.
5. Go fuck yourself.
6. Go fuck yourself.
7. Go fuck yourself.
8. Go fuck yourself.
9. Go fuck yourself.
10. Take your entitlement and shove it up your fat ass...if you can fit it up there with your head.

Why didn’t you know that Ford voluntarily reached out to the Washington Post?
 
I don’t believe you. You didn’t know that Ford had VOLUNTARILY reached out to the Washington Post in July

I did know that. I acknowledged it. What you failed to acknowledge was that she did so anonymously and "wasn't ready" to go public.
 
That's what you all were arguing in 2016.

So now you gotta eat that plate of shit.

I asked how you felt about it. You are basing your opinion about whether the Senate should vote for confirmation on what "you all were arguing in 2016?"

Don't you have any independent views of your own. And I never argued any such crap as "giving the people a voice."

How are Republicans going to eat a plate of shit? It looks like they will vote on the confirmation.

What if they wait until after the election and the Democrats win the House but Republicans maintain control of the Senate. Does that mean the people want the Senate to confirm?
 
I've offered a way for the anonymity to go away and you refuse to be a ma

You offered nothing. You wanted to place conditions on me so that you could verify the claims that make up the basis of support for all your shitty arguments.

It's not on me to do anything for you to verify who you are. You should be doing that anyway. Otherwise, you're just another Conservative poseur.

Do you think that you can make personal claims about yourself, and we are just supposed to accept it? Why the fuck should anyone believe any shit you say about yourself anonymously on a message board?
 
I did know that. I acknowledged it. What you failed to acknowledge was that she did so anonymously and "wasn't ready" to go public.

You are lying. She did not go to the Washington Post anonymously. The post reporter claims to have been in contact with her

The post reporter honored her request not to go public with what she was told and it was off the record. But the Washington Post reporter most definitely knew who Ford was

Why do you lie?
 
Why didn’t you know that Ford voluntarily reached out to the Washington Post?

I did. I acknowledged it.

I see what's happening here. You switched IDs, didn't you? OMG. So I was having this exact same discussion with "Teflon Don" before, and here you are making the exact same argument.

So what, you changed your ID because your previous argument with me fell apart when I showed how you misrepresented this whole thing? It's you, isn't it? LMAO! Wow.
 
OOPS you've revealed once again, that you're not an American; because you let the "d" off of did.

OOPS you've revealed once again, that you're not an American; because you let the "d" off of did. :palm:

She can call for anything she wants; but it doesn't mean anyone has to do it or are you of the idea that entitlement means you get what you want??

:facepalm:

Unlike you, I'm not presenting myself as something I'm not.

And this is exactly why Conservatives are going to lose bigly in 7 weeks.

Yes you are; because you're trying to say you're an American, when you've shown you're not. :D

Another prickdicktion, for be saved. :laugh:
 
I asked how you felt about it. You are basing your opinion about whether the Senate should vote for confirmation on what "you all were arguing in 2016?"

I feel like it sucks, but you're the ones who made it this way.

Now you don't want to eat that plate of shit because you know how bad it tastes.

LMAO. So predictable.
 
You're trying to suss out information on Ford's kids so you can harass them because you're a fucking loser.

Sent your shitty post to the FBI.

And there response will probably be:

giphy.gif
 
Don't you have any independent views of your own. And I never argued any such crap as "giving the people a voice."

Sure you did.

You supported the justification used to prevent a hearing on Garland.

Now you don't want to support that same justification here.

You're the ones that did this, by the way. It was thanks to you and the shit you support that SCOTUS now must be determined by election outcomes.

You don't get to run away from that now.


How are Republicans going to eat a plate of shit? It looks like they will vote on the confirmation.

I wouldn't bet on it. It's even money now that the nomination is pulled by Sunday. And they're going to eat a plate of shit at the ballot box because no matter what they do now, they're either going to have a tsunami of female voters against them, or the Conservatives won't show up because they wouldn't back a rapist.


What if they wait until after the election and the Democrats win the House but Republicans maintain control of the Senate. Does that mean the people want the Senate to confirm?

Sure. Elections have consequences.
 
What stops them from voting before the election? They heard from the American people in 2016 when they elected the current president and Senate. In 2019 we will have a new Congress and they can do whatever they want. Garland has nothing to do with it. And I don't know who "you all" is but I never said anything about hearing from the American people. I only said it would be a waste of time to hold hearings on Garland since he did not have the votes for confirmation.

The American people seldom vote for specific actions like Supreme Court appointments. Democrats are going to vote Democratic even if there was no appointment pending.

LV has already said this is about VENGENCE; so anything else LV offers, ls tainted.
 
Back
Top