Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Are you a fucking idiot again?
You don't even know WHAT pattern broke down. Even in that section... GROWTH IN THE ECONOMY AND MARKETS CAME FIRST...THEN JOB GROWTH. You fucking moron.
Forced to look at Retirement Savings (puking)
- Thread starter Chapdog
- Start date
Are you a fucking idiot again?
You don't even know WHAT pattern broke down. Even in that section... GROWTH IN THE ECONOMY AND MARKETS CAME FIRST...THEN JOB GROWTH. You fucking moron.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
you truly are a fucking idiot. You proved that what we were saying is correct and that what you are saying is wrong. Your own links prove that. You fucking brain dead piece of shit.
evince
Truthmatters
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
what does a securities broker sell?
what was it the banks were caught doing after these laws began being inforced?
rolling shit sub prime into mortgage securities that were labeled triple AAA.
gee but your claim is broker rules mean nothing huh
what does a securities broker sell?
what was it the banks were caught doing after these laws began being inforced?
rolling shit sub prime into mortgage securities that were labeled triple AAA.
gee but your claim is broker rules mean nothing huh
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
wrong thread you fucking retard.
He was an uneducated regular joe like you
Unsophisticated would be a compliment to both of you
Good for you!
Trying hard to teach an uneducated moron basic economics.
You have more faith in the far below average Betty than I do.
LMAO; remember, we're dealing with gullible economic dunces here.
Taft2016
Verified User
I imagine if you left it where it was, you've done quite nicely.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Desh has proclaimed him to be a prophet.
people casually throw around terms "stupid" all the time that it loses a lot of its meaning. Desh is a true through and through stupid person. Not in an insulting way, not in a mean way, she's just stupid. Simple as that. We breath air, the sky is blue, desh is stupid. Just a basic fact. If desh isn't stupid, then who would be? Seriously, think about that.
Doesn't matter how simple and to the point your post might be, she doesn't have the capability to grasp it.
Desh is stupid. Once people realize this, it's much easier to deal with her presence.
do you really think she would lie and post links that completely refute her own argument?
she isn't lying, she just doesn't understand big words. she is just stupid.
evince
Truthmatters
and you flop like a fish on the deck
Most people are uneducated and unsophisticated like you!
evince
Truthmatters
Oh I thought you had me on ignore now?
hahahahahahahahahahah
poor little No second date nate .
hating people for giving you facts you cant refute is pathetic.
tell me grindage was uscitizen right?
are you mad because he was right?
are you mad that I asked a poster to prove his point and then its turns out his point was only half true?
evince
Truthmatters
and exactly what is it you think you are?
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...-recovery.html
From 1948 through 1982, recessions and recoveries followed a tight pattern. Growth plunged in the downturn, then spiked quickly. When growth returned, so did job creation.
You can see those patterns in comparisons of job creation and growth rates across post-World War II recoveries. Starting in 1949 and continuing for more than 30 years, once the economy started to grow after a recession, major job creation usually followed within about a year.
At the height of those recoveries, every 1 percentage point of economic growth typically spurred about 0.6 percentage points of job growth. You could call that number the “job intensity” of growth.
The pattern began to break down in the 1992 recovery, which began under President George H. W. Bush. It took about three years — instead of one — for job creation to ramp up. Even then, the “job intensity” of that recovery barely topped 0.4 percent.
The next two recoveries were even worse. Three-and-a-half years into the recovery that began in 2001 under President George W. Bush, job intensity was stuck under 0.2 percent. The Obama recovery is now up to an intensity of 0.3 percent, or about half the historical average.
From 1948 through 1982, recessions and recoveries followed a tight pattern. Growth plunged in the downturn, then spiked quickly. When growth returned, so did job creation.
You can see those patterns in comparisons of job creation and growth rates across post-World War II recoveries. Starting in 1949 and continuing for more than 30 years, once the economy started to grow after a recession, major job creation usually followed within about a year.
At the height of those recoveries, every 1 percentage point of economic growth typically spurred about 0.6 percentage points of job growth. You could call that number the “job intensity” of growth.
The pattern began to break down in the 1992 recovery, which began under President George H. W. Bush. It took about three years — instead of one — for job creation to ramp up. Even then, the “job intensity” of that recovery barely topped 0.4 percent.
The next two recoveries were even worse. Three-and-a-half years into the recovery that began in 2001 under President George W. Bush, job intensity was stuck under 0.2 percent. The Obama recovery is now up to an intensity of 0.3 percent, or about half the historical average.
Someone with two degrees more than you!
And a live time of studying the economy that needs those as a starting point.