For you who know a bit about economics...

The Dude said:
of course you aren't becuase you didn't go
sf listed his college, as did mott who is an ohio slow fan though he didn't go thier
dixie has, winter and soc have,
most people don't go to college and it's obvious you didn't bravo.
NOthing wrong with not going, being ashamed and hiding behind bs is funny as fuck though.
Click to expand...

What's funny as fuck is, if you are correct and he didn't go to college, he sure makes fools out of many supposedly educated pinheads, on a daily basis. It doesn't say much for college educated pinheads, that's for sure. Week in and week out, nobody on this board PWNS as much pinhead ass as bravo, with the possible exception of myself.
 
Dixie please let me know your prediction on the next superbowl... Im going to put all I have on the other team and double my money on that sure thing. I have never once seen one of your predictions be true.
 
Heres one for you Jarhead......as you watch the DOW drop 800+ points in the last 8 days, chew on this....

when the people and the world realize that this "deal" is a mirage .... that spending reductions are largely imaginary .... that US debt reduction is bogus...this already barely breathing economy will deteriorate to even worse shape than it is today.....especially if the Democrats retain power in 2012.....
 
Do all the people crowing about "spending" being the main culprit in this country's economic woes actually understand what the recipient of that spending actually does?

Do all the people crowing about how "raising taxes" would cause further devastation realize that the taxes would only incrementally be raised on those who could afford it, while "tax cuts" for those that no longer need it (as they didn't create jobs anyway) keep billions out of the coffers?

I suspect the answer would just be the usual talking points of omitted facts. But anyway, here's the DEAL explained in the NY Times:


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...110722-comparing-deficit-reduction-plans.html
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Do all the people crowing about "spending" being the main culprit in this country's economic woes actually understand what the recipient of that spending actually does?

Do all the people crowing about how "raising taxes" would cause further devastation realize that the taxes would only incrementally be raised on those who could afford it, while "tax cuts" for those that no longer need it (as they didn't create jobs anyway) keep billions out of the coffers?

I suspect the answer would just be the usual talking points of omitted facts. But anyway, here's the DEAL explained in the NY Times:


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...110722-comparing-deficit-reduction-plans.html
Click to expand...

and we suspect, once again, that you're showing your idiotic grasp on economics and taxation based on liberal talking points from the times.
 
the supposed spending cuts are nothing but slowing the rate of increase, so dems have all the power and republicans are wrestling some back with sanity.

The fear mongering GED (bravo) is full of shit, the economy is not going to crash because of the yet again raised debt ceiling.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Do all the people crowing about "spending" being the main culprit in this country's economic woes actually understand what the recipient of that spending actually does?

Do all the people crowing about how "raising taxes" would cause further devastation realize that the taxes would only incrementally be raised on those who could afford it, while "tax cuts" for those that no longer need it (as they didn't create jobs anyway) keep billions out of the coffers?

I suspect the answer would just be the usual talking points of omitted facts. But anyway, here's the DEAL explained in the NY Times:


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...ion-plans.html
Click to expand...


and we suspect, once again, that you're showing your idiotic grasp on economics and taxation based on liberal talking points from the times.
Click to expand...

Translation: our resident gun toting teabagging oather/threeper/neocon lunkhead in libertarian clothing doesn't DARE address the information contained in the link provided, nor can he honestly and rationally answer the questions I put forth.

You and your ilk have ROYALLY fucked up, STY....and the people are fast acknowledging buyers remorse from the 2010 elections. Thanks for acting JUST like I predicted, bunky. You make your screen name more of a joke with each post.
 
The Dude said:
the supposed spending cuts are nothing but slowing the rate of increase, so dems have all the power and republicans are wrestling some back with sanity.

The fear mongering GED (bravo) is full of shit, the economy is not going to crash because of the yet again raised debt ceiling.
Click to expand...


IF THE ECONOMY IS GOING TO CRASH (and I sincerely hope it doesn't):

The economy is going to crash because of the fraud perpetraited by the bank CEO's with the mortgage debacle.

The economy is going to crash because of the fraud and absurd actions by a deregulated Wall St.

The economy is going to crash because of an unnecessary invasion/occupation of Iraq while simultaneously carrying on a "war" in Afghanistan THAT WAS NOT PROPERLY PUT ON THE BUDGET.

The economy is going to crash because a perscription drug plan that was practically written by the pharma lobby was NOT properly paid for.

The economy is going to crash because you have corporations getting tax breaks to outsource jobs that could be held in America.

The economy is going to crash because you have tax breaks for wealthy people who DID NOT create jobs with their extra largesse.

The economy is going to crash because you have major corporations like Mobile pay a pittance of revenue taxes, or use loopholes to virtually avoid paying taxes that go into US coffers.


Raising the debt ceiling has been done by both parties for decades, and it's NOT the main culprit.....it has been recently used as a smokescreen. What we are seeing is the insane, almost fanatical devotion to the failed ideals of reaganomics by the GOP, which is being realized by the general population as the economic death cult that it is.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: our resident gun toting teabagging oather/threeper/neocon lunkhead in libertarian clothing doesn't DARE address the information contained in the link provided, nor can he honestly and rationally answer the questions I put forth.

You and your ilk have ROYALLY fucked up, STY....and the people are fast acknowledging buyers remorse from the 2010 elections. Thanks for acting JUST like I predicted, bunky. You make your screen name more of a joke with each post.
Click to expand...

Your point is as elusive as always.

That means, "you're supposed questions that you can't keep up with are why you keep referring to past quotes, and questions that you've made."

I guess that the 2012 election will make you look like a cool and with-it kind of guy/girl, or a really big loser.

My money says that you'll eat crow.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: our resident gun toting teabagging oather/threeper/neocon lunkhead in libertarian clothing doesn't DARE address the information contained in the link provided, nor can he honestly and rationally answer the questions I put forth.

You and your ilk have ROYALLY fucked up, STY....and the people are fast acknowledging buyers remorse from the 2010 elections. Thanks for acting JUST like I predicted, bunky. You make your screen name more of a joke with each post.
Click to expand...

i'm seriously disappointed in you. you've forgotten part of your labeling. you're also willfully ignorant of the pulse of mainstream americans.
 
Liberty said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Translation: our resident gun toting teabagging oather/threeper/neocon lunkhead in libertarian clothing doesn't DARE address the information contained in the link provided, nor can he honestly and rationally answer the questions I put forth.

You and your ilk have ROYALLY fucked up, STY....and the people are fast acknowledging buyers remorse from the 2010 elections. Thanks for acting JUST like I predicted, bunky. You make your screen name more of a joke with each post.
Click to expand...

Your point is as elusive as always.

Translation: Liberty is either too stupid or too stubborn to acknowledge the information in my link or honestly address the questions I asked.

That means, "you're supposed questions that you can't keep up with are why you keep referring to past quotes, and questions that you've made."

A patented display of the moronic ramblings that spews from Liberty whenever he cannot logically or factually refute or dispute information I put forth..or questions that I raise that would require Liberty to honestly give answers that may betray his neocon/libertarian beliefs and mantras. Liberty cannot even manage a coherent dodge.

I guess that the 2012 election will make you look like a cool and with-it kind of guy/girl, or a really big loser.

See above responses.

My money says that you'll eat crow.
Click to expand...

See above responses
 
SmarterThanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Translation: our resident gun toting teabagging oather/threeper/neocon lunkhead in libertarian clothing doesn't DARE address the information contained in the link provided, nor can he honestly and rationally answer the questions I put forth.

You and your ilk have ROYALLY fucked up, STY....and the people are fast acknowledging buyers remorse from the 2010 elections. Thanks for acting JUST like I predicted, bunky. You make your screen name more of a joke with each post.
Click to expand...


i'm seriously disappointed in you. you've forgotten part of your labeling. you're also willfully ignorant of the pulse of mainstream americans.
Click to expand...

Awww, what's the matter bunky......you can't muster the brains or the balls to honestly debate the issue at hand? Gonna wuss out with a bunch of empty accusations and declarations instead?

Grow the fuck up, STY....or continue down the path I so aptly described. If it's the latter, I won't waste a response, and leave you to the maudlin cheers of your equally intellectually bankrupt buddies. Carry on.
 
There was a local article today saying unemployment is expected to rise in the Bay Area and then there was another article stating tech people were getting up to five job offers each, some being offered signing bonuses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top