For the fake postmodern profit. LOL

wiseones2cents said:
Well you idiot. The authors of the Bible's book of Genesis were human. And they account for the estimates from Adam to Abraham to add up to 1656 years(That's IF you believe humans lived to 1000 years old. Also, human historians put Abraham at about 2000 B.C.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham#CITEREFMcNutt1999

The Bible's internal chronology places Abraham around 2000 BCE, but the stories in Genesis cannot be related to the known history of that time and most biblical histories accordingly no longer begin with the patriarchal period.

So count with me! Adam 4000 BCE. ABRAHAM 2000 BCE. Today 2014 A.D. = About 6000 years old.
Click to expand...

Prove they didn't live for what would amount to thousands of todays years.
 
wiseones2cents said:
I doesn't take a rocket scientist to see most of the laws existed prior to the laws of Moses. Not to mention they are considerably older, so they could have made new laws or simplified existing laws. The jewish perception of their god is a fraud.lol
Click to expand...

however, it apparently takes an idiot to think they are the same thing as the Ten Commandments.....
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Prove they didn't live for what would amount to thousands of todays years.
Click to expand...

Prove that they did. Why was average Biblical lifespans reduce from 1000 years to 200 years after a span of 200 years?

Now wonder Christianity is so lost....These guys are fucking stupid as can be! I said even assuming that the years of the book of Genesis is accurate? That puts the world at 6000 years old.
 
Uncle Charley said:
There is a very good reason why God formed woman from a man's rib. If you were a wise man you'd know why, but you're a fool.
Click to expand...

Really? Maybe you can explain the reason. I'm sure people can come up with all kinds of bullshit to cover up all the OBVIOUS contradictions in Scripture. And they do for the naïve that desperately want to believe its true.lol
 
PostmodernProphet said:
well, granted I don't believe that life spontaneously crawled out of a puddle of mud, I don't believe human beings and sphagnum moss have a common ancestor, and I don't believe gravity caused dust to form into suns and planets which then created gravity.....but other than that, I don't know why you have to call my cosmology ridiculous....../grins....
Click to expand...


I have already expressed why it is ridiculous.

No one has suggested that life spontaneously "crawled" out of the mud. You are not that stupid as I have exposed you to the ACTUAL theories. You are just a lying pos.

Your strawman claims about gravity are just as dishonest.
 
wiseones2cents said:
Prove that they did. Why was average Biblical lifespans reduce from 1000 years to 200 years after a span of 200 years?

Now wonder Christianity is so lost....These guys are fucking stupid as can be! I said even assuming that the years of the book of Genesis is accurate? That puts the world at 6000 years old.
Click to expand...


Now-now; it was your response to my question, that I asked for proof for and you have failed to do so.
Would you care to try again?
 
Predictably, we have now come to the part where we are all to dumb to argue with, everyone except wiseonecents that is...
 
PostmodernProphet said:
????....squiggled and squirmed then?.....does that really make you feel better?.....
Click to expand...

It's not any more accurate and I am pretty sure you know that by now. Meanwhile, many of the faithful ACTUALLY argue that the earth is 6k-10k years old, that the flood story is historically accurate and that life was created as it now is. Literal belief in the Old Testament is ridiculous. Any educated and sane person knows it is nothing more than "poetry" or a fairy tale, at best.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
It's not any more accurate and I am pretty sure you know that by now. Meanwhile, many of the faithful ACTUALLY argue that the earth is 6k-10k years old, that the flood story is historically accurate and that life was created as it now is. Literal belief in the Old Testament is ridiculous. Any educated and sane person knows it is nothing more than "poetry" or a fairy tale, at best.
Click to expand...

What percentage equals "many"?? :dunno:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
of course its accurate.....what do you think abiogenesis claims if not that exact thing....
Click to expand...

No, it is not accurate to claim that life spontaneously squiggled, squirmed or crawled out of a mud puddle.

Abiogenesis claims that life as simple cells developed from simple organic compounds. It does not cover anything that could be said to crawl, squiggle or squirm and certainly not a land animal as your image of something crawling out of a mud puddle implies. That is explained by 3,000,000,000 years of evolution or five hundred thousand times the amount of time your silly book uses to explain the existence of everything.

I have schooled you many times on these subjects. I believe you know you are misrepresenting the science or you just insist on your ignorance. It's quite telling that your world view is dependent on distorting the facts and willful ignorance.
 
by the way, did you ever find any evidence of a single celled organism evolving into a multicelled organism......(actually I know you haven't....I'm just messing with you).......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top