For Jarod - Jerry Brown and Pot

cawacko

Well-known member
Ouch, this one is going to leave a mark.



California governor unsure legal pot is good plan


California Gov. Jerry Brown said he is not sure legalizing marijuana is a good idea in his state because the country could lose its competitive edge if too many people are getting stoned.

If pot smoking gains more legitimacy in the nation's most populous state, Brown said he worries it could have negative ripple effects.

"The problem with anything, a certain amount is OK. But there is a tendency to go to extremes," he said in a wide-ranging interview aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." ''And all of a sudden, if there's advertising and legitimacy, how many people can get stoned and still have a great state or a great nation?"

Californians voted to legalize medical marijuana in 1996. But Brown said he is watching closely to see how Colorado and Washington handle their new laws that go a step further by regulating the growth and sale of taxed recreational marijuana at state-licensed stores. Colorado's pot shops opened Jan. 1, and Washington's are expected to open later this year.

"We have medical marijuana, which gets very close to what they have in Colorado and Washington. I'd really like those two states to show us how it's going to work," he said. "The world's pretty dangerous, very competitive. I think we need to stay alert, if not 24 hours a day, more than some of the potheads might be able to put together."

Brown, who was interviewed remotely from San Francisco, also discussed California's drought problems, climate change and his future political career.

Now, as he prepares to run for his fourth term as governor, Brown said that despite his progressive politics, the key to turning California's budget deficit into a projected multibillion-dollar budget surplus was exerting fiscal discipline.

"You've got to be tough on spending. No matter how liberal you want to be, at the end of the day, fiscal discipline is the fundamental predicate of a free society," he said.

Brown also mused about the Democratic Party's future, saying he favored a Hillary Clinton bid for president in 2016.

"She's got more experience, both domestic and international," he said. "I mean, it's her nomination if she wants it, as far as I'm concerned."


http://www.sfgate.com/news/medical/...nor-unsure-legal-pot-is-good-plan-5282390.php
 
His logic is really flawed on this. People tend to "go to extremes?" Are we a nation of alcoholics?

The assumption is that everyone would just become a stoner. I've heard that a million times w/ this debate, but there is no basis in precedent.
 
His logic is really flawed on this. People tend to "go to extremes?" Are we a nation of alcoholics?

The assumption is that everyone would just become a stoner. I've heard that a million times w/ this debate, but there is no basis in precedent.


People won't become stoners. They'll become full on junkies once the Gateway Drug is legalized.
 
Ouch, this one is going to leave a mark.



California governor unsure legal pot is good plan


California Gov. Jerry Brown said he is not sure legalizing marijuana is a good idea in his state because the country could lose its competitive edge if too many people are getting stoned.

If pot smoking gains more legitimacy in the nation's most populous state, Brown said he worries it could have negative ripple effects.

"The problem with anything, a certain amount is OK. But there is a tendency to go to extremes," he said in a wide-ranging interview aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." ''And all of a sudden, if there's advertising and legitimacy, how many people can get stoned and still have a great state or a great nation?"

Californians voted to legalize medical marijuana in 1996. But Brown said he is watching closely to see how Colorado and Washington handle their new laws that go a step further by regulating the growth and sale of taxed recreational marijuana at state-licensed stores. Colorado's pot shops opened Jan. 1, and Washington's are expected to open later this year.

"We have medical marijuana, which gets very close to what they have in Colorado and Washington. I'd really like those two states to show us how it's going to work," he said. "The world's pretty dangerous, very competitive. I think we need to stay alert, if not 24 hours a day, more than some of the potheads might be able to put together."

Brown, who was interviewed remotely from San Francisco, also discussed California's drought problems, climate change and his future political career.

Now, as he prepares to run for his fourth term as governor, Brown said that despite his progressive politics, the key to turning California's budget deficit into a projected multibillion-dollar budget surplus was exerting fiscal discipline.

"You've got to be tough on spending. No matter how liberal you want to be, at the end of the day, fiscal discipline is the fundamental predicate of a free society," he said.

Brown also mused about the Democratic Party's future, saying he favored a Hillary Clinton bid for president in 2016.

"She's got more experience, both domestic and international," he said. "I mean, it's her nomination if she wants it, as far as I'm concerned."


http://www.sfgate.com/news/medical/...nor-unsure-legal-pot-is-good-plan-5282390.php

LMAO; can you imagine the ridicule a Republican would get making such statements?
 
People won't become stoners. They'll become full on junkies once the Gateway Drug is legalized.

Are you being sarcastic?

I think Jerry Brown's argument is worthless but he did not actually come out against legalized pot. He is just advocating caution.

As it relates to usage, it is virtually legal in California already. Anybody that wants to can get a prescription.
 
Are you being sarcastic?

I think Jerry Brown's argument is worthless but he did not actually come out against legalized pot. He is just advocating caution.

As it relates to usage, it is virtually legal in California already. Anybody that wants to can get a prescription.



Yes, I was being sarcastic.
 
All the sudden Riechwingers are listening to moon at jerry!

I posted this because Jarod always says it's Republican politicians who are against pot (which many are but clearly many Democrats feel the same way) and Brown is his choice for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
 
He is not a very bright person, in the future you should spell it out as you are posting the sarcastic response.

If he would have indicated that is what the typical science denying Republican believes then it would have been clear.

I understand that this is not proof that Democrats are against legalized pot.
 
If he would have indicated that is what the typical science denying Republican believes then it would have been clear.

I understand that this is not proof that Democrats are against legalized pot.

I thought you claimed to be a Libertarian? Now you have suddenly become a Republican? Because we all know you deny basic genetics.
 
He is not a very bright person, in the future you should spell it out as you are posting the sarcastic response.


I think he's quite bright. The trouble, as I see it, is that lots of people on this here board genuinely believe seriously outlandish shit so its not always easy to knwo what is sarcasm and what is a genuinely held beleif. It doesn't help that names change all the time, too.
 
proof that Democrats are against legalized pot.

I hope you were being sarcastic.

1. He did not come out against legalization, he urged caution and said he is not sure.
2. While he is/was, likely still is my candidate for the Nomination I disagree with his reason for caution, but agree with his urging of caution.
3. Its clear the Republicans are about 90% against legalization and the Democrats are about 50%.

As Yoda would say

"One Governor, the Democratic party is not."
 
3. Its clear the Republicans are about 90% against legalization and the Democrats are about 50%.


Really ?....has there been a poll to this affect ?

With so many against it....how did legalization get passed in the first place.
 
I thought you claimed to be a Libertarian? Now you have suddenly become a Republican? Because we all know you deny basic genetics.

Here you go again... trying to hijack another thread. You are the one that denied basic genetics and biology. You want me to list your errors again?
 
Last edited:
Really ?....has there been a poll to this affect ?

With so many against it....how did legalization get passed in the first place.

YEs, I've posted it before... Ill look for it. Its not 90% but its close.
 
Back
Top