For Desh - Black Nationalism

So having not grown up in a in a poor black community we have a common starting point. The poor black inner city neighborhoods that are crime ridden have been under democratic leadership, many of them black are the result of democratic policies- period. HMMMMM. Republicans also allow black members at the table- We just don't first identify them as black- but as conservative.

http://thegrio.com/2013/08/28/from-1963-to-2013-is-black-america-better-off-after-i-have-a-dream/

BS. It's the Republican Congress that is cutting social programs, food stamps, funding for education and infrastructure, day care, school lunches that is negatively affecting the black community. So stop with the mindless mantra about "all under Democratic leadership", because any dimwit knows that is not the case. Most of the black Representatives in the House are Democrats. Why are there so few black Republican representatives???????????????????
And you sound like an idiot. Where are any black Republicans in leadership positions? I'll wait. And who is "we"???? You don't run anything. And what sense does what you call them make?
P.s. We have no common starting point. Actually we have nothing in common.
 
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2013/12/most_poor_people_in_america_are_white.html



Fact: Most poor people in the United States are white.




According to Census figures in 2013, 18.9 million whites are poor. That’s 8 million more poor white people than poor black people, and more than 5 million more than those who identify as Latino. A majority of those benefiting from programs like food stamps and Medicaid are white, too.


But somehow our picture of poverty is different, and the media tends to tell us a different story. A recent New York Times story, “Cut in Food Stamps Forces Hard Choices on Poor,” included only pictures of African Americans and Latinos from the Bronx, N.Y., and a number of Southern states. In October, the Times published another story about the impact of states’ rejection of the Medicaid expansion that’s part of the Affordable Care Act.


The images accompanying that story were also all of black or Latino families. Was that because only blacks and Latinos receive Medicaid? No.



So, why didn’t the Times include a picture like this one?

1385595072.jpg
They’re all white, they’re organizing to raise poverty wages in Wisconsin and they’re all in need of Medicaid.


The Times and others like them are likely responding to the reality that blacks and Latinos are disproportionately poor—27 percent of African Americans and 25 percent of Latinos are poor, compared to just 9 percent of whites—and are disproportionately harmed by cuts to food stamps or limits to Medicaid.


And I agree with the authors of these reports that we ought to be troubled by disproportionate harm to groups we know have been discriminated against. Yet, inadvertently, the traditional media’s one-sided image of poverty has contributed to the misconception that most poor people are black and that most black people are poor—although more than 70 percent are not.


This stereotype, like most stereotypes, harms black people in myriad ways, especially because the political right has linked poverty with moral failure as a trope to undermine public support for government programs—remember Ronald Reagan’s welfare queen? These tactics didn’t end in the 1980s. Last week, for example, Fox News’ Brad Blakeman said the government was "like a drug dealer" peddling "dependency" to food-stamp recipients.


Social scientists and others have long made the observation that the media over-emphasizes people of color in coverage of poverty and government benefits. But if the message hasn’t yet reached even the New York Times, it clearly needs to be said again.
 
the right likes to make its minions think when they shit on the poor they are only shitting on people of color
 
the right likes to make its minions think when they shit on the poor they are only shitting on people of color

But the stupid white conservatives keep voting for the right/Republican/conservative ideology, which they hardly understand, because if they did, they would vote Democratic.
 
But the stupid white conservatives keep voting for the right/Republican/conservative ideology, which they hardly understand, because if they did, they would vote Democratic.

How DARE you talk about what white people should do. I am white and I am an authority on white people. You are black and thus your opinions are not valid when discussing what white people should or should not think/do.
 
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2013/12/most_poor_people_in_america_are_white.html



Fact: Most poor people in the United States are white.




According to Census figures in 2013, 18.9 million whites are poor. That’s 8 million more poor white people than poor black people, and more than 5 million more than those who identify as Latino. A majority of those benefiting from programs like food stamps and Medicaid are white, too.


But somehow our picture of poverty is different, and the media tends to tell us a different story. A recent New York Times story, “Cut in Food Stamps Forces Hard Choices on Poor,” included only pictures of African Americans and Latinos from the Bronx, N.Y., and a number of Southern states. In October, the Times published another story about the impact of states’ rejection of the Medicaid expansion that’s part of the Affordable Care Act.


The images accompanying that story were also all of black or Latino families. Was that because only blacks and Latinos receive Medicaid? No.



So, why didn’t the Times include a picture like this one?

View attachment 2428
They’re all white, they’re organizing to raise poverty wages in Wisconsin and they’re all in need of Medicaid.


The Times and others like them are likely responding to the reality that blacks and Latinos are disproportionately poor—27 percent of African Americans and 25 percent of Latinos are poor, compared to just 9 percent of whites—and are disproportionately harmed by cuts to food stamps or limits to Medicaid.


And I agree with the authors of these reports that we ought to be troubled by disproportionate harm to groups we know have been discriminated against. Yet, inadvertently, the traditional media’s one-sided image of poverty has contributed to the misconception that most poor people are black and that most black people are poor—although more than 70 percent are not.


This stereotype, like most stereotypes, harms black people in myriad ways, especially because the political right has linked poverty with moral failure as a trope to undermine public support for government programs—remember Ronald Reagan’s welfare queen? These tactics didn’t end in the 1980s. Last week, for example, Fox News’ Brad Blakeman said the government was "like a drug dealer" peddling "dependency" to food-stamp recipients.


Social scientists and others have long made the observation that the media over-emphasizes people of color in coverage of poverty and government benefits. But if the message hasn’t yet reached even the New York Times, it clearly needs to be said again.

Then why are there more poor Black people, by percentages according to population break down?
 
This message is hidden because cawacko is on your ignore list.

This message is hidden because Superfreak is on your ignore list.
 
How DARE you talk about what white people should do. I am white and I am an authority on white people. You are black and thus your opinions are not valid when discussing what white people should or should not think/do.

Because he is black he is an authority period? Or maybe because he is a victim of whitey he is an authority? Or maybe because he is convinced of his own self righteousness he is an authority? The list of possibilities is endless.
 
Nobody I know that is black is a victim.....any assholes are excluded from my circle.

Who gives a fuck what you speak against. Black people are having to endure the onslaught by the right, against their humanity, dignity and human rights.....because you operate in and on "white privilege". Nobody is hearing that shit, save you. We are not going to tolerate further attempts at discrimination, disenfranchisement, racism, or exclusion from the American Dream....we gon' take ours. You best get your guns and shoot all of us, like Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin...because your days of unbridled control and dominance is over.

Well I don't give a fuck what you think- After reading a smattering of your posts you have no real insight. Your posts are mere regurgitated bullshit full of self righteous idiocy and bigotry.

The stupidity, over the very idea of my thinking, or anyone thinking, that they have "unbridled control" is just the kind of idiocy espoused by liberals. You all want to have a fight over shit no one wants to have a fight about because they just don't think like that. OBVIOUSLY, however, YOU DO . You are just the kind of perpetual victim I despise. MY GAWD, get yourself a new soapbox chick!

http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/victimhood.php
 
Well I don't give a fuck what you think- After reading a smattering of your posts you have no real insight. Your posts are mere regurgitated bullshit full of self righteous idiocy and bigotry.

The stupidity, over the very idea of my thinking, or anyone thinking, that they have "unbridled control" is just the kind of idiocy espoused by liberals. You all want to have a fight over shit no one wants to have a fight about because they just don't think like that. OBVIOUSLY, however, YOU DO . You are just the kind of perpetual victim I despise. MY GAWD, get yourself a new soapbox chick!

Well, you obviously gave enough of a fuck to respond. LOL. Self-righteous idiocy and bigotry? Well, isn't that the
"go to" response of the white and privileged? Everyone else is fucked up, except you. And then, typically, you blame liberals. LOLOLOL. What the fuck do you mean "no one thinks like that"? You do. Your cohorts do. You think you're God's gift to the world, and the end all and the be all. Newsflash. You're not.
And just because you say something or think something, in your recalcitrant mind, doesn't make it true, rational, or relevant. I'm not a victim.....victims cower in corners. I'm kicking your ass, verbally and virtually, to your face, bitch.
and I got your "chick", "swinging", between my legs.
 
Why do you ms racist have to try and pretend anyone is 'hating on black people'? Why do you constantly race bait? Why are you a LIAR?


I dont need to pretend.


Your party cheats black people out of their votes to win elections and you pretend its not true even htough there is mountains of court documented evidence
 
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-25/news/mn-7435_1_republican-national-committee




GOP Memo Admits Plan Could 'Keep Black Vote Down'

October 25, 1986|From the Washington Post












NEWARK, N.J. — A Republican National Committee official calculated that a so-called ballot security program in Louisiana "could keep the black vote down considerably," according to documents released in federal court Friday.

The documents and court hearing were the latest developments in a controversy over the GOP's ballot program that Democrats maintain is aimed at reducing minority turnout. The Republicans say the program's sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.





In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:

"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."

Unseals Document

She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
 
Now super why do all you right wing fucks pretend that is not a court case your fucks lost?


its real, its History, its undeniable yet you people deny it
 
http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public..._v_Republican_Natl_Comm_673_F3d_192_3d_Cir_20



is this real super?






“That evidence includes proof that the RNC violated the Decree in 1990 and in 2004, when it created voter challenge lists that targeted minority voters; that between 1997 and 2008, Republican candidates and party organizations had engaged in separate voter suppression activities in various states, including Texas, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin; and that the racially polarized voting that influenced the RNC in the 1980s persists today,” Angelo Genova wrote in his brief to the court.

“This substantial evidence stands in stark contrast to the RNC’s proffered ‘evidence,’ “ Mr. Genova added. He said the Republicans had made a “preposterous claim that because President Obama, Attorney General [Eric] Holder, and former RNC leaders Michael Steele and Boyd Rutherford are African-American, the RNC no longer has any incentive to suppress minority votes in violation of the terms of the Consent Decree.”
 
Still won't address the OP will you Desh. If it comes to black community all you can talk about is voting like there is nothing else to them.
 
Back
Top