Flynn Wins!

[Geeko Sportivo]

The appeals court rules Sullivan has to drop the Flynn case 2:1. You go Flynn! Powell is a hell of a lawyer.

If or when this passes through the Supreme Court, we'll see who has the final say on this matter.

So far, it is obvious that Donald Trump has corrupted many of the appeals courts by stacking them with unqualified irresponsible quacks and political hacks- BUT THE SUPREME COURT SEEMS TO BE UNSCATHED BY THE CORRUPTION!

 

[Irish]

Obama gate needs to be exposed. We may only have 4 months left to dig out the critters before Biden gets in there and shuts it all down.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

What was the predicate for the *interrogation* again? I forgot.

Don’t worry Darth, I’ll fill you in.

The FBI’s opening documentation in August 2016 for the investigation into Flynn stated that there was an articulable factual basis that Flynn “may wittingly or unwittingly be involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security”.

According to the DoJ’s inspector general, the Flynn investigation was properly predicated as a full investigation (which of course permits the subject to be interviewed by the FBI then or later). In his report on the FBI’s conduct in the Russia investigation, the inspector general said: “The quantum of information articulated by the FBI to open these individual investigations (Flynn, Carter Page, Papadopoulos, Manafort) was sufficient to satisfy the low threshold established by Department and FBI predication policy.”

The DoJ’s argument for dropping the case was that FURTHER PREDICATION was required to interview Flynn in January 2017, even though he was already under investigation. Do you understand the reasoning here?

 

[dukkha]

Don’t worry Darth, I’ll fill you in.

The FBI’s opening documentation in August 2016 for the investigation into Flynn stated that there was an articulable factual basis that Flynn “may wittingly or unwittingly be involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security”.

According to the DoJ’s inspector general, the Flynn investigation was properly predicated as a full investigation (which of course permits the subject to be interviewed by the FBI then or later). In his report on the FBI’s conduct in the Russia investigation, the inspector general said: “The quantum of information articulated by the FBI to open these individual investigations (Flynn, Carter Page, Papadopoulos, Manafort) was sufficient to satisfy the low threshold established by Department and FBI predication policy.”

The DoJ’s argument for dropping the case was that FURTHER PREDICATION was required to interview Flynn in January 2017, even though he was already under investigation. Do you understand the reasoning here?

you did get that Comey in the early Jan. WH meeting said Flynn's phone calls "appeared legit"?

 

[Darth Omar]

Don’t worry Darth, I’ll fill you in.

The FBI’s opening documentation in August 2016 for the investigation into Flynn stated that there was an articulable factual basis that Flynn “may wittingly or unwittingly be involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security”.

According to the DoJ’s inspector general, the Flynn investigation was properly predicated as a full investigation (which of course permits the subject to be interviewed by the FBI then or later). In his report on the FBI’s conduct in the Russia investigation, the inspector general said: “The quantum of information articulated by the FBI to open these individual investigations (Flynn, Carter Page, Papadopoulos, Manafort) was sufficient to satisfy the low threshold established by Department and FBI predication policy.”

The DoJ’s argument for dropping the case was that FURTHER PREDICATION was required to interview Flynn in January 2017, even though he was already under investigation. Do you understand the reasoning here?

Except for why the investigation wasn’t dropped.

How does the Logan Act fit it again? Help me out here.

 

[Concart]

He was set to score big via his plan to kidnap the Muslim cleric and deliver him to Turkey.

And he has a ready audience for his 'I am a victim' tell all.

 

[archives]

The appeals court rules Sullivan has to drop the Flynn case 2:1. You go Flynn! Powell is a hell of a lawyer.

Wins what?

As with Trump, kinda like OJ, he got off, largely with the help of billy barr, but few view him as innocent

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Except for why the investigation wasn’t dropped.

The investigation wasn't dropped because it was a properly predicated ongoing investigation, as the DoJ inspector general confirmed.

How does the Logan Act fit it again?

Flynn was not prosecuted or convicted under the Logan Act. He was prosecuted for lying to the FBI and pleaded guilty.

Later he said no, he didn't do it; and Barr's DoJ apparently buys that. WTH?

 

[Darth Omar]

The investigation wasn't dropped because it was a properly predicated ongoing investigation, as the DoJ inspector general confirmed.




Flynn was not prosecuted or convicted under the Logan Act. He was prosecuted for lying to the FBI and pleaded guilty.

Later he said no, he didn't do it; and Barr's DoJ apparently buys that. WTH?

Defendants aren’t allowed to withdraw their plea? Again, is this Russia?

So, where does the Logan Act come in again?

 

[Althea]

Then start over—without the entrapment—and charge him for it.

There was no entrapment. Flynn rolled over to a small charge because they also had his son dead to rights. Flynn is filthy. It remains to be seen if Biden wants to make him pay.