Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

[Into the Night]

No, you're doing the exact opposite of avoiding the errors here, you are introducing them and really just highlighting why dictionaries and encyclopedias are so important. I get into these errors below.

No dictionary defines any word. False authority fallacy. Repetition fallacy (chanting).

No, we agree on math.

No, you don't. You deny mathematics as well.

It's your definitions of words like abortion where we disagree.

Not his definition. You do NOT get to redefine words..

Again, we agree on math.

Lie. You don't.

It's your definition of certain words that's the problem. Thus, my insistence that we use dictionaries and encyclopedias to try to find agreement on the definitions of certain words.

Dictionaries to not define any word.
Encyclopedias do not define any word.
False authority fallacies. Repetition fallacy (chanting).

 

[Into the Night]

Tell me, how would -you- describe the definition(s) of a word?

Nonsense question. Go learn English.

 

[Into the Night]

Well, I tried to find common ground for word definitions with you, but I think at this point it's become a lost cause.

You never did. You are preaching. You are grabbing any kind of false authority you can think of.

 

[Into the Night]

I suspect we're not going to come to an agreement here.

Obviously. You don't know the language.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, I suspect we're not going to come to an agreement here.

Because you insist on false authorities.

If you find a definition or usage of the word abortion in a dictionary that you can accept, let me know- I can then take a look at it and see if I can also accept it.

RQAA.

Abortion is the taking of a human life. It is a contract killing. When done for convenience, it is murder.

 

[Into the Night]

There are definitely rules in this forum. They're even posted here:

Thread 'Rules of the Board!'

Jul 22, 2006

This site uses user driven content, each user is responsible for the content and opinions in their posts. The owners of the site JPPolitics LLC do not necessarily share the opinions of the author of any post on the forums. This forum was created for Political commentary, News, Education, and entertainment purposes. Please read the rules carefully before posting on the forums.

General Forum Rules
(These rules apply to the entire site)

1. No posting private information without consent. We will delete the posts and you will likely not have access for at least a couple...

• Generic
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Rules

That being said, posting a set of rules is not the same thing as enforcing them. Things get especially complicated when the rules are ambiguous. This is why I reported one of IBDaMann's posts- to try to get some clarity on whether or not JPP Admins consider IBDaMann's quote box altering qualifies as quote box altering under Rule 16.

It doesn't. Go talk to Damocles about it.

 

[Into the Night]

They are listed but not actually enforced anymore.

Yes they are, 12b. You were banned for awhile, remember???

 

[Into the Night]

I'd say that almost everyone, if not everyone, tends to stick to sources that they find to be reliable.

A false authority is not a valid source.

I think we could agree that not everyone's sources -are- reliable- if they were, I doubt that we'd have the heated disagreements that we have in this forum.

A false authority is not a valid source.

I think the key to constructive debates is to try to understand why we disagree with each other. A lot of time, that involves delving into each other's sources of information and from there, making arguments as to why those sources are biased and/or authorative.

The ONLY authoritative meaning of any word is the etymology of that word. You CANNOT redefine a word at your convenience. Go learn English.

 

[domer76]

How'd it go?

Not yet.