Fl voter laws tossed by judge

Nordberg said:
Obama's judges were approved by the ABA. Many of Trump's were not. You have to consider that the judges were making valid decisions. Trump has no respect for the law. You can expect a response to what he did.
Click to expand...

That doesn't explain why they were almost unanimously overturned on their decisions against Trump's actions. Instead, it is just a red herring in the form of an irrelevant appeal to authority.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Did you only read the first phrase of what you quoted? Or is your ability to understand the English language stunted?

Here. Let me help you by giving you the judge's interpretation of that section of the Constitution. I'll bold the relevant sections including the sections the judge himself highlighted.



https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21564733/ndfl-voting.pdf
Click to expand...

WHAT A FUCKING LIAR. THAT IS NOT THE WORDING OF ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTIION, THIS IS:


Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.



THERE IS NO BULLSHIT :"BUT THE CONGRESS..." REGARDING ELECTION LAWS.

YOU QUOTED A SINCE OVERTURNED COURT CASE , AND PRETENDED IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION.

WHAT AN IGNORAMUS FUCKHEAD YOU ARE.


YOU/'RE FUCKING PATHETIC, AND A PROVEN LIAR...AGAIN.



AND THE FUCKHEAD JUDGE WILL GET HIS ASS HEANDED TO HIM ,ON APPEAL.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I do have to say, you are digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole as you continue to make factual errors about what the judge said and actually ruled on. I hope the lawyers for the state are as ill informed as you are when they appeal.
Click to expand...

seems you don't even know where to look to find the "facts" the judge ruled on.......
 
T. A. Gardner said:
As I stated, I used to keep score on that when Trump was in office. I stopped doing it over a year ago. Not everything requires a 'link.'
Click to expand...

Commie Shitstain ROE:

1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect.

3. Ignore any facts presented.

3a. Play dumb and keep others wasting their time trying to enlighten you.

4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.

5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence, Age.

6. Employ misdirection.

6a. smear people.

6b. attack religion.

6c. attack your rationality.

7. Lie, make false assumptions.

8. Play race/gender card/misogynist card.

9. Play gay/lesbian card.

10. Play the Nazi/Fascist/bigot card.

11. Make up stuff/So you got nothing?

12. Deny constantly.

13. Reword and repeat.

14. Pretending not to understand, playing ignorant/what did I lie about.

15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.

16. Russia.

17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity/OAN.

18. You can’t read.

19. Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump.

20. What about...

That's why, because they always do one or more of all of the above. ;)

Feel free to use this list to bitchslap commie shitstains. ;)

It's open-source. :D
 
Stone said:
Do your minders know what you do online ? Are there any orderlies hanging around carrying any of those funny looking "jackets" they make you wear some times?
Click to expand...

Don't even bother with the dingbat anymore, the Progs on here enable her craziness. Rune, to my great surprise, finally woke up and has gone from defending her to calling her a loony as well.
 
Last edited:
So all the MAGA minions have to do is provide the legal statutes where it says that a U.S. District Court judge cannot make such rulings for states under his jurisdiction. When they can do that, THEN they have a basis beyond sour grapes for debate. Until then, it'll be up to the higher court and/or SCOTUS to make that decision.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top