First it was Confederate monuments - Now it's former president William McKinley

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, you did when you used the word firearms. Since they are not alive, therefore, they need someone that is to make the function as designed. Unless it can grow arms/legs, walk to where it fires, and pulls it own trigger, it's not a danger unless SOMEONE misuses it. It simply can't function in the manner you say without that happening.

You simply can't go one sentence without being a motherfucking nigger, boy.

Again fucking pussy ass, pathetic racist. Grab some ricin another inanimate object strap it to your back and go around telling and showing everyone what you have. Then call me from fucking jail you racist piece of shit.
 
Except that even Columbus was a shithead even by contemporary 15th and 16th century standards. Joke is on you.

Yeh, because the Spanish were noted for their humane treatment and fairness!! Look at that thoroughly nice man Cortes and how well he treated the Aztecs for instance.

Although Columbus was stripped of his governorship, King Ferdinand not only granted the explorer his freedom but subsidized a fourth voyage.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
You are so full of shit.

You do know that Columbus' mismanage and atrocities were so bad that he had a Royal Commission investigate his governorship. They arrested him and brought him back to Spain in chains. Where the King spared his life but stripped him of a title and the governorship.

So even by contemporary 15th and 16th century standards he was a complete fuck head.

Learn some history before embarrassing yourself some more.

By 21st century standards, you're a complete fuckhead. Anyone that claims someone shouldn't own something then refuses to do anything about is a certified fuckhead.

Perhaps you should grow some balls before telling me what I should and shouldn't own, boy.
 
Again fucking pussy ass, pathetic racist. Grab some ricin another inanimate object strap it to your back and go around telling and showing everyone what you have. Then call me from fucking jail you racist piece of shit.

Where did I mention ricin and claim people should be able to open carry it?
 
Yeh, because the Spanish were noted for their humane treatment and fairness!! Look at that thoroughly nice man Cortes and how well he treated the Aztecs for instance.

Although Columbus was stripped of his governorship, King Ferdinand not only granted the explorer his freedom but subsidized a fourth voyage.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

So your are saying in essence that even by the ridiculously low standard set by the Spanish that Columbus was still so bad and so malicious that even they had to take punitive actions against him. That is your argument.

Setting the bar a little low are we.
 
By 21st century standards, you're a complete fuckhead. Anyone that claims someone shouldn't own something then refuses to do anything about is a certified fuckhead.

Perhaps you should grow some balls before telling me what I should and shouldn't own, boy.

Says the fucking racist cunt. By 21st century standard you are fucking pussy, racist, asshole that cannot is so fucking ignorant you cannot even process an analogy. Fucking stupid racist little punk that you are.
 
Too ignorant to be able to process an analogy. Speaks to supposed superiority you racist fucking cunt.

For it to be an analogy, everything related to the two examples would have to be the same. They aren't unless you can show me an amendment protecting my right to own ricin.

That's why I'm superior to your kind. I don't equate things that aren't equal.
 
Says the fucking racist cunt. By 21st century standard you are fucking pussy, racist, asshole that cannot is so fucking ignorant you cannot even process an analogy. Fucking stupid racist little punk that you are.

I'm not the one that claimed another person shouldn't own something then refused to show up and try to take it.

It isn't an analogy unless all the conditions are the same.
 
For it to be an analogy, everything related to the two examples would have to be the same. They aren't unless you can show me an amendment protecting my right to own ricin.

That's why I'm superior to your kind. I don't equate things that aren't equal.

You are that dumb you fucking racist pig.
 
There are a myriad of reasons for the secession -you know this. The primary mover was slavery but it wasn't the sole factor.
I defend statues of soldiers in battle -and recall Congress allowed the CSA to be considered veterans for purposes of grave tendering.

I do not defend the antebellum south, or the reasons for secession.
My concern is historical rembrance for the brave and honorable on both sides, and battle markers themselves.

which is why I always promote a historical commission to make these decisions, not done in the heat of passion in the middle of the night

Traitors are not honorable but you wouldn't know that because you are traitorous scum.
 
right on que...the Small Mind looks at Columbus thru 21th century eyes;
when historical figures must be judged in the context of their times..

But you made Darla happy-anytime PC infested thought is used as a metric

You fucking retard.
Columbus was a criminal in his own time.
Slavery was illegal in most of Europe at that time and had been for centuries in Italy.
All his illegal slaves were tracked down and freed you fucking simple shitstain.
He was no hero, he was an international criminal but of course a racist life long southerner is going to apologize for a slaver.

The same thing applies to the traitorous criminals who rebelled, by any standard, then or now they were traitors
and all moral people at that time were abhorrent towards slavery.

Research abolitionists to start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top