FELONY - Pedodent Brandon gives free cell phones to illegal alien invaders

Bullshit, dude, and I sincerely hope you do realize what you just wrote was a bullshit comparison; there's a major fucking difference between the boss of an organization who both controls and should be held responsible his HR staff versus Ford being held responsible for all the DUIs on JPP who were driving Fords.

If a CEO is so clueless, why do you think they rate all the big bucks? Isn't it their fucking job?

In the Navy, if the Officer of the Watch is a junior grade officer and makes a mistake resulting in the collision with another vessel, who is ultimately responsible? According to the Navy, the Commanding Officer, the Captain of the ship. He was given a position of responsibility protecting the lives of every person under him/her. His failure to properly qualify his crew enough to avoid a collision with another fucking boat in open water is inexcusable.

RB, you, sir, are an example of majority of the American public who are willing to let our leaders, both business and politics, dodge their responsibilities for arbitrary reasons. There's a general national failure to hold our leaders to a higher standard appropriate for their position since 1992 and here we are, 30 fucking years later, seeing the results.

If you want to invest your life savings in a company or fund run by a CEO who doesn't have a fucking clue what his HR department is doing, that's your choice. I prefer competent leaders.

I believe we are on Earth to make choices. It's part of having Free Will. Some people choose to do nothing. Some overreact. Some try to use reason. All are choices. It's up to you. Me? I blame the CO/CEO for any mistakes in the company.

17 US Sailors died in this collision. There needs to be a bond of trust between We, the People and our leaders...and our leaders should be held accountable for their actions. That's not happening because We, the People are dividing ourselves over politics...which plays into their hands.

5c76b844e369c.image.jpg

You don't know shit about business. Don't try to tell me (or anyone) that you do.
 
You don't know shit about business. Don't try to tell me (or anyone) that you do.

No shit! That's why I just hand my wife the checkbook and say "I love you, sweetie".

The fact you broke away from the point is your choice, RB. You always have choices just like everyone else.

I once had a NDE. The main effect upon me? More likely to take personal chances. Not chances endangering anyone else, just "career" type chances. Mainly just being myself. If they didn't like it, fuck them. LOL

I lucked out and did okay.
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."

One of your problems is you think the people are as corrupt and dishonest as you.
 
I would gladly have ANY 10 illegal aliens (and I will just have to hope they are not 'naughty') come to America if it meant permanently deporting you.

I mean that 100%.

You are a disgrace to everything good in America, IMO.

HAHAHA. How much does mexico pay you to say that? Like all illegal alien supporters you are a traitor.
 
Foxnews, and that explains it at a troll promoting fake, misinformation and propaganda media trash. As a half assed troll and ignoramus, consider the following complete facts when it comes to immigration and asylum seekers:

What Is Asylum?
Asylum is a protection granted to foreign nationals already in the United States or arriving at the border who meet the international law definition of a “refugee.” The United Nations 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol define a refugee as a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country, and cannot obtain protection in that country, due to past persecution or a well-founded fear of being persecuted in the future “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.

As a signatory to the 1967 Protocol, and through U.S. immigration law, the United States has legal obligations to provide protection to those who qualify as refugees. The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee or in the United States as an asylum seeker.

How Does Asylum Help People Fleeing Persecution?
An asylee—or a person granted asylum—is protected from being returned to his or her home country, is authorized to work in the United States, may apply for a Social Security card, may request permission to travel overseas, and can petition to bring family members to the United States. Asylees may also be eligible for certain government programs, such as Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance.

After one year, an asylee may apply for lawful permanent resident status (i.e., a green card). Once the individual becomes a permanent resident, he or she must wait four years to apply for citizenship.

What Is the Asylum Application Process?
There are two primary ways in which a person may apply for asylum in the United States: the affirmative process and the defensive process.

Affirmative Asylum: A person who is not in removal proceedings may affirmatively apply for asylum through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a division of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). If the USCIS asylum officer does not grant the asylum application and the applicant does not have a lawful immigration status, he or she is referred to the immigration court for removal proceedings, where he or she may renew the request for asylum through the defensive process and appear before an immigration judge.
Defensive Asylum: A person who is in removal proceedings may apply for asylum defensively by filing the application with an immigration judge at the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) in the Department of Justice. In other words, asylum is applied for as a defense against removal from the U.S. Unlike the criminal court system, EOIR does not provide appointed counsel for individuals in immigration court, even if they are unable to retain an attorney on their own.
Asylum seekers who arrive at a U.S. port of entry or enter the United States without inspection generally must apply through the defensive asylum process. Both application processes require the asylum seeker to be physically present in the United States.

With or without counsel, an asylum seeker has the burden of proving that he or she meets the definition of a refugee. Asylum seekers often provide substantial evidence throughout the affirmative and defensive processes demonstrating either past persecution or that they have a “well-founded fear” of future persecution in their home country. However, the individual’s own testimony is usually critical to his or her asylum determination.

Certain factors bar individuals from asylum. With limited exceptions, individuals who fail to apply for asylum within one year of entering the United States will be barred from receiving asylum. Similarly, applicants who are found to pose a danger to the United States are barred from asylum." This is also federal law.

https://www.americanimmigrationcoun...a protection granted,or her home country, and

Furthermore, it appears this claim of giving illegal immigrants cell phones is false as in bullshit as a bill or possible proposal:

Bloggers charge that new immigration legislation includes "a taxpayer funded cellular phone" for new immigrants. Their evidence is based on something else entirely: a public safety program aimed at beefing up border security.

The bill includes grants aimed at helping American ranchers and others in remote locations along the border get satellite phone service so they can be in touch with authorities. And Rubio can point to a well-documented case in which a rancher was killed on his property, and authorities said better phone service would have made a difference in speeding up their response to the case.

We rate the claim False.
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...ants-would-get-free-cell-phones-under-new-pr/

THEY DON'T WANT ASYLUM YOU IDIOT. THEY WANT WELFARE
 
Obviously the draw is jobs and cheap housing. Since no sane person wants to induce a recession to slow illegal immigration, my suggestion is to start arresting anyone who hires, harbors or otherwise supports or entices illegals to come to the US. Six months in prison for the first offense. A year for the second.

We already have a law that says that. Section 1324. But it's not enforced. Even trump didn't enforce it.
 
An m1garand couldn't do that either. It had very good sights but still not a scope.

Wrong again, dipshit. I did it myself with an M-14. Certainly an M1 could do it too: http://www.easy39th.com/korea/files/FM_23-5_U.S._Rifle_Caliber_.30,_M1_1951.pdf

At ranges over 500 yards, a battlefield target is hard for the average rifleman to hit. Therefore, 500 yards is considered the maximum effective range, even though the rifle is accurate at much greater ranges.
 
Wrong again, dipshit. I did it myself with an M-14. Certainly an M1 could do it too: http://www.easy39th.com/korea/files/FM_23-5_U.S._Rifle_Caliber_.30,_M1_1951.pdf

Very very few men could hit a human target at 700 years with an m1 garand. It's hard to even see a human at that range without optics. Plus the bullet velocity would be way down and it would be dropping fast. If you do it, it's a case of compensating errors.

Not knocking the garand. It was the best infantry rifle of ww2 but that was a long time ago. Big gun - weighed like 9 pounds.
 
Very very few men could hit a human target at 700 years with an m1 garand. It's hard to even see a human at that range without optics. Plus the bullet velocity would be way down and it would be dropping fast. If you do it, it's a case of compensating errors.

Not knocking the garand. It was the best infantry rifle of ww2 but that was a long time ago. Big gun - weighed like 9 pounds.

Proving you're a bigger fucking moron than I initially believed. How long have you been a fucking loser, TDAK? Ever since your slut mommy dumped you on the subway floor?

Kentucky windage solves a lot of long range problems. Not saying it's a heart shot, but being hit by a large bore bullet at any range is not a joke. I hit the target multiple times. It's a matter of training.
 
Back
Top