Federal troops kill a man because he carried a concealed gun.

If a cop gets confused and doesnt follow their training properly

That does not excuse them for fucking up and killing ANYONE needlessly

They get charged and or stripped of their job
That's not what you claimed when Byrd shot Babbitt at the Capitol on Jan 6...
 
But but but the man had a gun and a mod behind him screaming to kill ICE. The Dems said it was OK to kill an unarmed woman because she had a mob behind her. So this shooting of an armed man that was fighting with Federal law enforcement must be OK.:dunno:
ya but I suspect you are lying about what happens as you KNOW the truth cannot help your argument. Provide video of anyone shouting to 'kill ice' in that area as i have not heard that yet in any of them.

With Ashley there was an active mob, who went well beyond protest an into violent attacks on cops, and smashing their way into the Capital while calling for violence on MIke Pence, Nancy Pelosi and other Congress people.

Ashley had left the protest (outside, not attacking cops or entering Congress) and had joined the mob on the HUNT.

That in no way compares to the history of protest in the US where citizens take to the streets to protest what they see as govt over reacch.

Your attempt to equate them and lie to do so shows you know you have nothing.
 
This is utter nonsense. You could file an "information" for a non-capital offense, but you are trying to say the man was murdered, and you are in Florida, this would not apply and you would never be able to charge that without a Grand Jury.

And pretending that an Information wouldn't require you to meet the elements of the crime is beyond irresponsible. No ethical prosecutor even in Florida would charge crimes without evidence that meets the elements of the crime.

Seriously... this is disturbing. If you were a prosecutor and regularly just "signed" Informations just because you felt good about things you were not just a bad prosecutor, you were acting extremely unethically.
Yes, my signature on an information, where did you think the signature was going.
 
ya but I suspect you are lying about what happens as you KNOW the truth cannot help your argument. Provide video of anyone shouting to 'kill ice' in that area as i have not heard that yet in any of them.

With Ashley there was an active mob, who went well beyond protest an into violent attacks on cops, and smashing their way into the Capital while calling for violence on MIke Pence, Nancy Pelosi and other Congress people.

Ashley had left the protest (outside, not attacking cops or entering Congress) and had joined the mob on the HUNT.

That in no way compares to the history of protest in the US where citizens take to the streets to protest what they see as govt over reacch.

Your attempt to equate them and lie to do so shows you know you have nothing.
You are aware the goal of J6 was to petition Congress for a redress of grievances, no?
That's the 1st Amendment.
That's was the ultimate goal of the whole thing, and it built up from election day until Jan 6th.
It was all in #stopthesteal. The leader was a teacher. Was Ashlii Babbit a teacher? :dunno:
 
But but but the man had a gun and a mod behind him screaming to kill ICE. The Dems said it was OK to kill an unarmed woman because she had a mob behind her. So this shooting of an armed man that was fighting with Federal law enforcement must be OK.:dunno:
Not the Democrats you fucking idiot

Our entire system determined it was a proper police action

Brain frozen cult cluck
 
This is utter nonsense. You could file an "information" for a non-capital offense, but you are trying to say the man was murdered, and you are in Florida, this would not apply and you would never be able to charge that without a Grand Jury.

And pretending that an Information wouldn't require you to meet the elements of the crime is beyond irresponsible. No ethical prosecutor even in Florida would charge crimes without evidence that meets the elements of the crime.

Seriously... this is disturbing. If you were a prosecutor and regularly just "signed" Informations just because you felt good about things you were not just a bad prosecutor, you were acting extremely unethically.
I never said that an information wouldn’t have to be defended. I said that that’s what it took to charge somebody.
 
But they do have removal orders, huh?
Fuck off. Wtf are you, some kind of illegal?
I know history and human rights. I don't want an armed gang busting down my door because my scatter gun may be a 1/2 inch too short after they pass a new law to confiscate a firearm that can't be traced.
 
Because that was adjudicated to be a legal police action
So? If this shooting in Minneapolis is deemed justified and legal, you'll still say it was illegal and murder, just as I say the Byrd shooting of Babbitt was. But at least in the case of Byrd there's more justification making it an illegal shooting than there ever will be in the shooting of Pretti.
 
I know history and human rights. I don't want an armed gang busting down my door because my scatter gun may be a 1/2 inch too short after they pass a new law to confiscate a firearm that can't be traced.
Calm your tits. It looks like you have ICE confused with ATF.
And I was just looking at a $1200-ish .223 Gatling gun. Not sure if stamp needed for it.
Maybe do not need stamp, and to make an LLC and all that bullshit.
It does not have a trigger. :dunno:
Don't be out on the streets fighting popo with that shotgun and you'll probably be OK.
Also, if you have to ever actually use it. You will get hosed if you call the police.
It would be better if you had a legal gun. :dunno:
 
Last edited:
I know history and human rights. I don't want an armed gang busting down my door because my scatter gun may be a 1/2 inch too short after they pass a new law to confiscate a firearm that can't be traced.
Trump won’t pass a law to take your guns

He will just order you to do it and you cultists will hand them over
 
Back
Top