Federal troops kill a man because he carried a concealed gun.

They have their own guns. Only ones I'd give any guns to is family or friends that needed them.
Not without funding idiot

Their guns won’t give them an airplane to fly around the country

Guns don’t produce has for vehicles

Or hotels

Or lunches

Or dinners

Or rent vehicles

Or buy bullet proof vests

ICE will have to walk

Or maybe Christie Numb will lead you her horse
 
Tell me more about these "in times", deshy. :BKick:
I didn't wanna be alive in them, but it's looking increasingly likely I just may be. :(
Ofc the alternative might suck, too.
It’s ancient myth to keep church goers putting money in the till

Should I quote the late great Mr Marley for you again
 
Ya know what I'm not doing, Cuppy-Cake?
Being out on the streets with a loaded and chambered firearm then going and messing with LEOs.

Pretti wasn't "messing with LEOs" either.

He was on the sidewalk recording the events with his phone. After one of trump's Gestapo shoved a woman to the pavement face-first from behind like a chickenshit pansy would do, Pretti tried to help her up. Then they pounced on him.

For no reason whatsoever.

These under-trained amateurs and street trash thugs are out of control.

Government murderers and assassins.
 
Pretti wasn't "messing with LEOs" either.

He was on the sidewalk recording the events with his phone. After one of trump's Gestapo shoved a woman to the pavement face-first from behind like a chickenshit pansy would do, Pretti tried to help her up. Then they pounced on him.

For no reason whatsoever.

These under-trained amateurs and street trash thugs are out of control.
Yes, the riot fomenters have clearly misrepresented what will likely happen if you're out there acting the fool and harassing LEOs.
They want you to die to obsucate their fraud on all taxpayers and you, too.
So snap to it, Skippy! Derp Derp
Be prepared to die for your cause. (that you were programmed with)
 
Last edited:
So you think it’s justified?

The shooting is likely justified. I can't clearly see--and neither can you--exactly what was going on in the struggle between multiple officers to restrain Pretti and his resisting arrest. It is clear the officers knew he was armed and it appears at one point Pretti made a movement that one or more of the officers present took to be him going for his gun. That ended things. Pretti fucked up having that weapon on him and resisting arrest.

Is he a “Domestic Terrorist”?
No, he's a fucking idiot, and so are you.
 
Where do you get this crazy shit? :palm:
From reality

You can’t understand.

You have been depending on trump ass pudding for your calorie too long

It’s getting more scarce every day

The ole ass is dying


So you hit the point where you are merely puking and slurping up your own bile to remain standing

It’s not going to meet the caloric intake your brain needs to keep functioning

Your brain is very fucked up

Soon you will be so fucked up you will be very willing to happily hand over your guns like brain damaged sheep

Your trial judge will take that into consideration
 
The shooting is likely justified. I can't clearly see--and neither can you--exactly what was going on in the struggle between multiple officers to restrain Pretti and his resisting arrest. It is clear the officers knew he was armed and it appears at one point Pretti made a movement that one or more of the officers present took to be him going for his gun. That ended things. Pretti fucked up having that weapon on him and resisting arrest.


No, he's a fucking idiot, and so are you.
What will you Russians do when too many Americans don’t buy this slop anymore

Tell Putin he failed
 
What will you Russians do when too many Americans don’t buy this slop anymore

Tell Putin he failed
Terry's mind has left him. Poor guy. He was actually ok the one time I met him but he sees Democrats getting terrorized and murdered and he secretly loves it. That can be the only reason he's defending this horror.
 
It became justified the moment he started struggling with officers and had a visible gun.
And who the fuck carries 2 magazines when they go out with a gun?
Just about nobody except LEOs and military. :rolleyes2:
He has a right to openly carry, it does not matter how many magazines he had. Seriously, you cannot argue a right to carry on one thread and then suddenly say that because he had some magazines with him he must have been a threat. There is zero opportunity for the Agents to even know how many magazines he had with him and would not be part of any review to see if it was justified.

Things that can make it "justified" will be measured on what a reasonable law enforcement officer at the time might have thought and will never be based on how many magazines he had with him. No law enforcement officer would have had that information until after the fact.

Factors that will matter in this case:
• A physical struggle in a volatile, crowded environment, which increases the risk of sudden escalation
• A perceived firearm during that struggle, which courts generally treat as an immediate deadly force threat
• The possibility that officers believed the individual was attempting to access or retain a weapon
• Reliance on warnings or reactions from fellow officers, such as hearing another officer shout that a gun was present
• The absence of a legal duty for police to retreat, unlike civilians in some states

Just saying that because police saw a gun on him they were justified is absurd. He has a right to own and bear arms, we all do, but he even had a "permit" to do so.
 
Back
Top