Federal troops kill a man because he carried a concealed gun.

Why are you so stupid?
aip0qn.jpg
 
I do!!!

Should have been the rule to start with!!!

Watching Trump backpedal from his murderous authoritarian plans along with the circular firing squad of Trump, Noem and CBP pointing blame is the funniest thing about this mess.
 
so once again - you shit stains thought your fellow shit stain was a good guy - but he was just another shit stain.


not a peaceful protestor. a nut job with a gun. kicking. spitting. screaming. causing destruction of property. all while armed

one of your team ---> cuckoo cuckoo
 
so once again - you shit stains thought your fellow shit stain was a good guy - but he was just another shit stain.


not a peaceful protestor. a nut job with a gun. kicking. spitting. screaming. causing destruction of property. all while armed

one of your team ---> cuckoo cuckoo
Ruh-roh! Legina is angwy!!! LOL

You must really, really hate the American Republic and our Constitution. Why do you hate it so much, girl?
 
I might, who knows.

Does that upset you?
I don't think you can do it...
 
My great great grand father was at the battle of San Jacinto and he and his son helped capture Santa Anna. They both became Texas Rangers. They carried Walker Colts as saddle guns.
So there was a man with an adult son who fought with him during the Battle of San Jacinto, and used a Colt Walker as part of the Texas Rangers about 20 years later? Let's say his son was 18, and he was 36, 20 years later he would be 56... extremely doubtful, but barely doable. Obviously, he could not have used the Colt Walker during the Texas Revolutionary War, and it would be doubtful he would have used it until well after the Mexican-American War. The Colt Paterson would have been more believable.

The Texas Rangers were the most effective carvery force at the time.
They really were not.

This was a clusterf*ck.
trump's JD and DHS have been trying to convince Americans that Pretti was a domestic terrorist, and the ICE agents had a good shoot. If they are covering up the incompetence, that is a crime.
 
So there was a man with an adult son who fought with him during the Battle of San Jacinto, and used a Colt Walker as part of the Texas Rangers about 20 years later? Let's say his son was 18, and he was 36, 20 years later he would be 56... extremely doubtful, but barely doable. Obviously, he could not have used the Colt Walker during the Texas Revolutionary War, and it would be doubtful he would have used it until well after the Mexican-American War. The Colt Paterson would have been more believable.
Santa Anna was arrested in 1836 the Colt Walker was manufactured in 1847. I ask my wife their exact ages because she is the one that has researched my family tree. His son certainly could have been younger than 18 in the Texas revolution so you may be off in your time line quiet a bit. Lets say his son was 16 and he was 36 so in 1847 he could have been 47 not 56. Only 1100 Colt Walkers we built and 1,000 were issued to Texas rangers.

They really were not.


trump's JD and DHS have been trying to convince Americans that Pretti was a domestic terrorist, and the ICE agents had a good shoot. If they are covering up the incompetence, that is a crime.
 
Only 1100 Colt Walkers we built and 1,000 were issued to Texas rangers.
Actually, 1,000 went to a US military contract, not the Texas Rangers. Two were given to one Texas Ranger, and other non-original runs were bought by Texas Rangers years later.

The 1,000 that were sold to the US Army were not all delivered during the war. Again, I guess it is possible that for some reason your ancestor was able to get one of the first ones bought by the Army, and his son was also able to do this great fete, but it is doubtful.
 
Back
Top