Federal judges are headed into a constitutional crisis

T. A. Gardner said:
What business is it of the judge's? What's ICE and CBP for if not to determine the legal status of someone in the US? Since when did that become a judge's job? Immigration courts are administrative, not judicial, and they normally decide that.

What should be obvious is this judge is ruling on the basis of politics, not the law.
Click to expand...
It's in the Constitution that you swore to support and defend, Terry. I know you've renounced your oath to the Constitution and support shredding it. It's one reason, when the shooting starts, you'll be a prime target by your neighbors or roommate. LOL
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Exactly. It's Due Process as stated in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. I'm fine with flying violent criminals halfway across the Gulf of America and releasing them, but the Constitution requires due process to make sure they are really violent criminals and not just people the DOGE doesn't like.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Click to expand...


AI Overview
Learn more

In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review decisions by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke previously approved visa petitions, as these revocations are considered discretionary agency actions and therefore not subject to judicial review.
 
volsrocks said:
Black people rioted and beat on cops ALL SUMMER in cities ALL across America

White people one afternoon in ONE city
Click to expand...
No, not really but you go with that. We all remember all your screeching and poutrage over the protests, even the non-violent ones. We do NOT, however, remember similar expressions of disapproval when thousands of MAGATs invaded the Capitol, caused massive property damage, tried to hang the VP and kill other elected ppl, and injured at least 140 officers charged with protecting them.

So which do you think is worst: People marching to protest the killings of unarmed Black ppl by cops, or an insurrection by crazed Cult members trying to overturn an American election via violence?
 
volsrocks said:
AI Overview
Learn more

In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review decisions by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke previously approved visa petitions, as these revocations are considered discretionary agency actions and therefore not subject to judicial review.
Click to expand...
9ns5xi.gif
 
volsrocks said:
Black people rioted and beat on cops ALL SUMMER in cities ALL across America

White people one afternoon in ONE city
Click to expand...
MAGAt rule #4 When the conversation isn't going your way, change the subject.
MAGAt rule #5 When losing an argument, use whataboutism

9nw8ub.gif
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
No, not really but you go with that. We all remember all your screeching and poutrage over the protests, even the non-violent ones. We do NOT, however, remember similar expressions of disapproval when thousands of MAGATs invaded the Capitol, caused massive property damage, tried to hang the VP and kill other elected ppl, and injured at least 140 officers charged with protecting them.

So which do you think is worst: People marching to protest the killings of unarmed Black ppl by cops, or an insurrection by crazed Cult members trying to overturn an American election via violence?
Click to expand...
 
Goyboy said:
It's overtime. The American people are tired of being ruled by a Judicial Dictatorship.
Click to expand...
And, it's getting worse. Judges did this something like 20 or 30 times on Obama, then about 70-ish on Biden, and since Trump took office again, it's over 100 already.

The US should not be run by unelected judges and lawyers, but increasingly it is.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It's amusing that you #TRE45ONv2.0 Cult members think that upholding the law is "unconstitutional." You truly do want a despotic fascist dictator rather than a president. Anyone who issues orders to stop unlawful actions is "a radical leftist" judge. What is wrong with you?
Click to expand...
You don't get it. This sort of shit shouldn't be happening regardless of WHO is president or what party they're in. The courts should be the absolute last resort, not the first. Increasingly, the courts are the first resort when some party doesn't get their way. The result is that increasingly, the US is being ruled, and law being made, by unelected judges and lawyers probably two groups of the most unqualified persons to be doing so there are.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's in the Constitution that you swore to support and defend, Terry. I know you've renounced your oath to the Constitution and support shredding it. It's one reason, when the shooting starts, you'll be a prime target by your neighbors or roommate. LOL
Click to expand...
Maybe you should try reading the fucking thing. Judges don't have unlimited power, and are not the final arbitrators on much of anything according to the Constitution. If they were to rule against a law, it gets sent back to Congress and Congress can make another try at it. On the other hand, they can't make up new laws whatsoever. Yet, that's exactly what they're fucking doing!

This judge in this deportation case is proclaiming himself as having jurisdiction over something he has ZERO fucking jurisdiction over. You have lowly, single, district judges now making national proclamations, and in effect, laws for the entire United States. That is so fucking unconstitutional it hurts. These judges are wrecking the nation, and it isn't about Democrat or Republican, they do it to both.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
On top of the federal judge that is demanding a stop to deportation of cartel members, gangsters, and terrorists, now another radical Leftist judge in Baltimore is demanding Trump rehire, restaff, and start all functions of USAID back up claiming his actions were "unconstitutional"--without citation to anything in the constitution of course...
Click to expand...
Ah no, Trump is purposely seeking a constitutional crisis, he wants one so that his SCOTUS can grant him unitary executive power which will give him autocratic rule
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So, you're psychotic... err, psychic. I'd say you are doing nothing but projection based on nothing. The above is a fallacy fallacy.
Click to expand...
Why?

Trump’s strategy has always been to challenge the Courts. He knows the Courts are his only hurdle, he has neutralized the Legislature, so he wants that Constitutional crisis knowing the SCOTUS will deliver
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top