Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Hugo.You produced no evidence.
Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Hugo.You produced no evidence.
Fake News. No police at the Capitol were injured on Jan 6th, Hugo.next day. Incomplete
You did, Hugo. It's YOUR paradox you locked yourself into. Only YOU can do anything about it. You MUST utterly discard one of the conflicting arguments to clear your paradox.I did not say that. You keep lying.
No cops were beat up, Hugo. Not on Jan 6 at the Capitol.Amazing you think cops deserve to get beat up.
That is not called 'habeas corpus', Wally.It is called habeas corpus. It literally means "to hold the body", and it means there should be some evidence to hold a body.
No one said they did, Wally.For investigating, and presenting the evidence they found. The police investigate, but they do not decide if someone is guilty.
No, he isn't, Wally. It must really suck to be so paranoid.trump is claiming that these people are enemies of the USA in a war,
He doesn't.so no longer have the right to due diligence. he claims he does not need evidence.
He doesn't know and he lies a lot.You know this how? Walter?
It's overtime. The American people are tired of being ruled by a Judicial Dictatorship.On top of the federal judge that is demanding a stop to deportation of cartel members, gangsters, and terrorists, now another radical Leftist judge in Baltimore is demanding Trump rehire, restaff, and start all functions of USAID back up claiming his actions were "unconstitutional"--without citation to anything in the constitution of course...
![]()
Judge rules DOGE's USAID dismantling likely violates the Constitution
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the Constitution in an order that blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from making further cuts to the agency.apnews.com
![]()
Judge blocks Trump, Musk from dismantling USAID in blow to crown jewel of DOGE cuts
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that President Trump’s right-hand man, Elon Musk, likely acted unconstitutionally with his directive to dismantle the US Agency for International Development…nypost.com
On top of the federal judge that is demanding a stop to deportation of cartel members, gangsters, and terrorists, now another radical Leftist judge in Baltimore is demanding Trump rehire, restaff, and start all functions of USAID back up claiming his actions were "unconstitutional"--without citation to anything in the constitution of course...
![]()
Judge rules DOGE's USAID dismantling likely violates the Constitution
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the Constitution in an order that blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from making further cuts to the agency.apnews.com
![]()
Judge blocks Trump, Musk from dismantling USAID in blow to crown jewel of DOGE cuts
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that President Trump’s right-hand man, Elon Musk, likely acted unconstitutionally with his directive to dismantle the US Agency for International Development…nypost.com
It's amusing that you #TRE45ONv2.0 Cult members think that upholding the law is "unconstitutional." You truly do want a despotic fascist dictator rather than a president. Anyone who issues orders to stop unlawful actions is "a radical leftist" judge. What is wrong with you?
Interesting right wingers don't give a shit if 150 cops get seriously beat up. Fuck you hypocrites.
Exactly. It's Due Process as stated in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. I'm fine with flying violent criminals halfway across the Gulf of America and releasing them, but the Constitution requires due process to make sure they are really violent criminals and not just people the DOGE doesn't like.What the judge is asking for is evidence of these claims. For all we know these deporties are law abiding US citizens.
Its The Constitution!What the judge is asking for is evidence of these claims. For all we know these deporties are law abiding US citizens.
Will you be remembering this when it's a Democrat President doing it to Nazis, be they American or Canadian, vols?AI Overview
Learn more
In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review decisions by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke previously approved visa petitions, as these revocations are considered discretionary agency actions and therefore not subject to judicial review.
Do you support attacking police as long as they aren't seriously injured, Ms. Fat Lane?How seriously?
Good thing you can't have kids, Lesion. According to you, you'd be held responsible for the actions of your adult children.