Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional

[Tinkerpeach]

not that part you're wrong about.........but nice try. Do you need remedial classes on the Constitution? Or do you prefer to have people you believe to be smarter than you tell you what it means?

Very bad dodge on your part.

 

[martin]

not that part you're wrong about.........but nice try. Do you need remedial classes on the Constitution? Or do you prefer to have people you believe to be smarter than you tell you what it means?

Pity her if she puts you among the "preferred", though I admit the absurdity of the arrogance you project makes me wonder if you're a joke.

 

[martin]

Very bad dodge on your part.

He's an empty bag.

 

[Into the Night]

Well since there is no one to define it how do you know?

It's written in plain English. I suggest you learn it.

I say it does, you say it doesn't, who settles it?

Nothing to 'settle'. It's written in plain English. Taking phrases of the Constitution out of context is not going to help you. That's a fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

This, of course, opens the door for the SCOTUS to rule on individual rights to own and bear arms.

What does?

 

[Into the Night]

Could you carry any gun you wanted before the constitution was written?

Yes or no.

Yes.

 

[Into the Night]

Very bad dodge on your part.

He didn't dodge. He answered your question, though not as tersely as I did.

 

[Into the Night]

Pity her if she puts you among the "preferred", though I admit the absurdity of the arrogance you project makes me wonder if you're a joke.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Into the Night]

He's an empty bag.

Fallacy fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

 

[martin]

Fallacy fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

Another empty bag, a strange one.

 

[Into the Night]

Another empty bag, a strange one.

Fallacy fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

 

[Tinkerpeach]

It's written in plain English. I suggest you learn it.

Nothing to 'settle'. It's written in plain English. Taking phrases of the Constitution out of context is not going to help you. That's a fallacy.

Nothing in the constitution defines it dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

Nothing in the constitution defines it dumbass.

Article I. The 2nd, 4th, 9th, 10th, and 14th Amendments. Go read them.

The Constitution does not give rights.

 

[Tinkerpeach]

Article I. The 2nd, 4th, 9th, and 10th Amendments. Go read them.

I don't need to, I have them memorized.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This, of course, opens the door for the SCOTUS to rule on individual rights to own and bear arms.

That is already decided, by the Constitution.

Since the current court has 5 Constitutionalists to the 3 Marxists and that idiot Roberts, I suspect the Constitution will prevail in the case.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Could you carry any gun you wanted before the constitution was written?

Yes or no.

The US Constitution?

No, the British had strict restrictions on what arms the public was allowed to own and banned the carry of arms in most of the cities of the colonies.

 

[domer76]

This, of course, opens the door for the SCOTUS to rule on individual rights to own and bear arms.

They already have.

 

[Tinkerpeach]

The US Constitution?

No, the British had strict restrictions on what arms the public was allowed to own and banned the carry of arms in most of the cities of the colonies.

And we overthrew them for that.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't need to, I have them memorized.

Obviously, you don't. Go read them.

 

[Into the Night]

That is already decided, by the Constitution.

Since the current court has 5 Constitutionalists to the 3 Marxists and that idiot Roberts, I suspect the Constitution will prevail in the case.

Quite possibly.