Federal Court Smacks Down Social Media Platform Censorship

304919184_3399093133701377_3662894774726291863_n.jpg
 
My apologies for interrupting your studies, sir. :)

Care to share any observations?

This is still America, land of the free. Speak your mind before the authoritarian assholes prevent you from doing so. :)

I rattle the cages with a stick.

Pro-tip: Never get your hand near a fence.
 
I can post videos where retards lost their hands at zoos here but I don't think Damofag will like that.

First, truth is truth. Humans vary on how they use truths.

Second, I don’t pay a fuckng penny for this place. Anyone who does, has my respect. Not subservience, just respect.
 
Fuck that faggot Damocles. Here's a censored version.

[video=youtube;tpmrWbjkW7E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpmrWbjkW7E[/vide]

I remember that incident. The douchebag wasn't even supposed to be near the cage, much less stick his hand inside. Killing the tiger to free the man was the best decision given the circumstances, but it was the man's fault.

As for censorship, this is America, land of the free and fucking lawyers who'll sue anybody. It's more about liability than censorship.

If a RWNJ keeps threatening to murder a Lefty then actually murders the JPP member, rapes and murder his/her kids, then the Social Media Platform (JPP in this case) would be liable for not controlling the situation. Now, the courts have freed JPP from that liability. At least that's my understanding of it.
 
The First Amendment prohibits government censorship and protects private censorship. In a free society, Twitter and Facebook are allowed to make horrible decisions with respect to content moderation, and you are allowed to tell them off and use another service.

- Justin Amash
 
Back
Top