Fed worried about its loose policies

cawacko said:
I'm well aware of those numbers. Again when the Fed keeps rates at zero like they did for years it's not all that surprising we got the asset inflation we did. Once again, we will be forced to pay the piper.
Click to expand...

If you are "well aware of those numbers" what inspired youi to bleat that ACA is a "jobs killer"? (rhetorical)

and this is the nth time you've asserted that we are in an asset bubble, but you've never explained WHAT assets are bubbling and why you believe so...

and, since you've been mewling about qualifications - if, for example, I was to say "Series 79", would you have any idea what that meant?
 
blackvegetable said:
If you are "well aware of those numbers" what inspired youi to bleat that ACA is a "jobs killer"? (rhetorical)

and this is the nth time you've asserted that we are in an asset bubble, but you've never explained WHAT assets are bubbling and why you believe so...

and, since you've been mewling about qualifications - if, for example, I was to say "Series 79", would you have any idea what that meant?
Click to expand...

1) I posted the Journal article on ACA job loss earlier in the thread

Stocks and real estate are in bubble territory
 
blackvegetable said:
If you are "well aware of those numbers" what inspired youi to bleat that ACA is a "jobs killer"? (rhetorical)

and this is the nth time you've asserted that we are in an asset bubble, but you've never explained WHAT assets are bubbling and why you believe so...

and, since you've been mewling about qualifications - if, for example, I was to say "Series 79", would you have any idea what that meant?
Click to expand...

You were the one talking about your great pedigree. So you work in i banking?
 
cawacko said:
1) I posted the Journal article on ACA job loss earlier in the thread

Stocks and real estate are in bubble territory
Click to expand...

This would be the opinion poll, suggesting that people surveyed believed ACA "killed" 1.4% of all jobs created since the signing of the law?

That's on one scale.........here's another....

It's almost exactly 1.35 million more private sector jobs than were gained through the course of Supply Side Idiocy, Part Deux.
 
blackvegetable said:
This would be the opinion poll, suggesting that people surveyed believed ACA "killed" 1.4% of all jobs created since the signing of the law?

That's on one scale.........here's another....

It's almost exactly 1.35 million more private sector jobs than were gained through the course of Supply Side Idiocy, Part Deux.
Click to expand...

So all QE all the time because they'll be no repercussions?
 
cawacko said:
You were the one talking about your great pedigree. So you work in i banking?
Click to expand...

That's the first hint I've dropped....and it doesn't involve "banking" in the sense you seem to understand it, rendering much further discussion on this point entirely useless.

What I have pointed out is that you don't know anything to which Drudge hasn't linked you.
 
blackvegetable said:
That's the first hint I've dropped....and it doesn't involve "banking" in the sense you seem to understand it, rendering much further discussion on this point entirely useless.

What I have pointed out is that you don't know anything to which Drudge hasn't linked you.
Click to expand...

I asked a question. Clearly that is offensive to you. Generally people aren't so defensive about their field if work but if it is a sore subject for you then fair enough.
 
blackvegetable said:
The existence of QE does not constitute proof of a bubble. FOCUS!

Do you understand what people mean when they talk of the "Fed put"?
Click to expand...

I never said its existence was proof of a bubble. What I said was we are in an asset bubble as a result of QE. A man of your pedigree should understand the difference
 
cawacko said:
I asked a question. Clearly that is offensive to you. Generally people aren't so defensive about their field if work but if it is a sore subject for you then fair enough.
Click to expand...

Natch.....now watch....

What do you do for a living?


The problem is that other than MBA, every other professional designation will be meaningless to you.....
 
blackvegetable said:
Natch.....now watch....

What do you do for a living?


The problem is that other than MBA, every other professional designation will be meaningless to you.....
Click to expand...

I've stated on here many times I invest in real estate.

I'm aware of many professional designations. Try me
 
cawacko said:
I never said it's existence was proof of a bubble. What I said was we are in an asset bubble as a result of QE. A man of your pedigree should understand the difference
Click to expand...


You should mind your mouth, Cretin........I have repeatedly asked by what criteria you declare assets you have yet to identify as being in a "bubble"......to which you responded



So all QE all the time because they'll be no repercussions?

that's all I've got to go on after 24 hrs.
 
cawacko said:
I've stated on here many times I invest in real estate.

I'm aware of many professional designations. Try me
Click to expand...

I have to be very careful how I put this (trademark issues)

With the exception of paying them a few hundred bucks (solely out of pique), I have completed all testing and professional requirements for CAIA ®

and there's more, but don't you think the point has been made?
 
blackvegetable said:
You should mind your mouth, Cretin........I have repeatedly asked by what criteria you declare assets you have yet to identify as being in a "bubble"......to which you responded



So all QE all the time because they'll be no repercussions?

that's all I've got to go on after 24 hrs.
Click to expand...

You must be such a joy at cocktail parties.

Why are we in a bubble? Because the Ded pushed investors into riskier assets. We saw before what happened when they turned the spigot off. Been through too many cycles to think it's any different now.

And look at real estate prices across the country. Again, unsustainable bubble territory
 
cawacko said:
You must be such a joy at cocktail parties.

Why are we in a bubble? Because the Ded pushed investors into riskier assets. We saw before what happened when they turned the spigot off. Been through too many cycles to think it's any different now.

And look at real estate prices across the country. Again, unsustainable bubble territory
Click to expand...

Avoid them like the plague.....I don't drink for recreation. But I'm much loved at gatherings.

So we're back to "The Fed had caused a bubble, and we're in a bubble"


I want you to read the following with care


BY WHAT METRIC DO YOU DETERMINE ASSETS TO BE IN A BUBBLE?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top