Fears mount on the deplorable dirty's 'rigged election' rhetoric

Darth Hussein Omar said:
Imagine if Trump was caught doing that lol.

Then there's this gem:

In an April 30, 2015 email, released Monday by WikiLeaks, Politico’s chief political correspondent Glenn Thrush asked John Podesta to approve his writing pre-publication. Thrush begged Podesta not to tell anyone he had shared the copy and referred to himself as “a hack” in the email exchange.

“No worries Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u,” Thrush wrote to Podesta. “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this Tell me if I fucked up anything.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/17/p...-hillary-aide-for-approval-admits-hes-a-hack/
________________

I'll take it a step further and say you have to be hack to defend this crap---or excuse it.
Click to expand...
the servile press speaks (above).
now add that up with "opposition journalism"from NYT. Or hiring a bunch of reporters exclusively to go after Trump by WaPo.
The free press is a joke.
 
anatta said:
the servile press speaks (above).
now add that up with "opposition journalism"from NYT. Or hiring a bunch of reporters exclusively to go after Trump by WaPo.
The free press is a joke.
Click to expand...

But it's not a big deal because...something something Trump lol.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
But it's not a big deal because...something something Trump lol.
Click to expand...
the bird dogging at rallies/ the servile press & assorted dirty tricks is all too common Democratic party behavior by the Clinton campaign.

They are a vile bunch. The DNC was corrupted , everything they touch is sketchy
 
anatta said:
the servile press speaks (above).
now add that up with "opposition journalism"from NYT. Or hiring a bunch of reporters exclusively to go after Trump by WaPo.
The free press is a joke.
Click to expand...

IT'S FREE IF THEY DO WHAT I WANT, IF THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT THEN IT IS NOT!!!
 
anatta said:
the bird dogging at rallies/ the servile press & assorted dirty tricks is all too common Democratic party behavior by the Clinton campaign.

They are a vile bunch. The DNC was corrupted , everything they touch is sketchy
Click to expand...

Well, if Hillary does get it we can remind some people they get what they voted for.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Well, if Hillary does get it we can remind some people they get what they voted for.
Click to expand...
US elections are becoming the stuff of banana republics.
Our electorate is distracted by shiny objects -missing the deeper slime/corruption/arrogance of power.
"I told you so" doesn't really help all that much
 
anatta said:
it's the abandonment of any semblance of objectivity. I mean WaPo and NYTimes are not some fringe website.
Click to expand...

The media is doing what the media always does-make money............

I am getting tired of hearing about the evil media that gave the SOB a billion dollars in free coverage-sure a lot of it was horrible because he is horrible..

They report what he says, they report what he does/has done & they are the bad guys.:palm:

Cry me a river.............
 
And, it doesn't help that the entire body of the media will not cover 100% of all news regarding both candidates.
 
Bill said:
The media is doing what the media always does-make money............

I am getting tired of hearing about the evil media that gave the SOB a billion dollars in free coverage-sure a lot of it was horrible because he is horrible..

They report what he says, they report what he does/has done & they are the bad guys.:palm:

Cry me a river.............
Click to expand...
he was a flamboyant character that came out of nowhere, and was never expected to win the nomination..that was the reason for the coverage.
and they DID cover his "Mexican Rapists" and "Muslim Ban" -even when he shifted off that to more nuance.

Now look at the fact WaPo is a Clintonian extension?? NYTimes abandons it's historic role of "paper of record"?

You're not getting the idea that "ratings" ( like the primary) is not the same as dumping pretexts of objectivity.
 
anatta said:
he was a flamboyant character that came out of nowhere, and was never expected to win the nomination..that was the reason for the coverage.
and they DID cover his "Mexican Rapists" and "Muslim Ban" -even when he shifted off that to more nuance.

Now look at the fact WaPo is a Clintonian extension?? NYTimes abandons it's historic role of "paper of record"?

You're not getting the idea that "ratings" ( like the primary) is not the same as dumping pretexts of objectivity.
Click to expand...

When did he make that shift?? PLs tell me the date, the time??
 
Bill said:
When did he make that shift?? PLs tell me the date, the time??
Click to expand...
don't have that exact timeline for you/
The "mexican rapists" I do know was clarified early as a slam against Mexican gov't dumping their garbage over the border
( or at least not being too worried about criminal illegals crossing - like the actor for Kate's Law) ..

The "Muslim ban" was quickly walked back too - I think it took a little longer - around the convention
where he proposed "extreme vetting" from "terrorists countries" (sic)
 
anatta said:
don't have that exact timeline for you/
The "mexican rapists" I do know was clarified early as a slam against Mexican gov't dumping their garbage over the border
( or at least not being too worried about criminal illegals crossing - like the actor for Kate's Law) ..

The "Muslim ban" was quickly walked back too - I think it took a little longer - around the convention
where he proposed "extreme vetting" from "terrorists countries" (sic)
Click to expand...

The Mexican immigration comments was never about Mexicans, generally. And his detractors knew it. Or they should have unless they need remedial reading help. The Muslim ban came with the qualifier 'till we figure out what's going on' but that was translated into an eternal ban all Muslims forever.

Trump made his share of gaffes but most of them were purposely mischaracterized.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
The Mexican immigration comments was never about Mexicans, generally. And his detractors knew it. Or they should have unless they need remedial reading help. The Muslim ban came with the qualifier 'till we figure out what's going on' but that was translated into an eternal ban all Muslims forever.

Trump made his share of gaffes but most of them were purposely mischaracterized.
Click to expand...
yep. "opposition journalism"made sure of that.
 
Good point, the media wants Hillary, not Trump. It's not in the media's interest to serve 100% of the public at large and distribute the pure news anymore. You're right, why would they?

Thanks for the reminder...silly me, LOL.
 
anatta said:
don't have that exact timeline for you/
The "mexican rapists" I do know was clarified early as a slam against Mexican gov't dumping their garbage over the border
( or at least not being too worried about criminal illegals crossing - like the actor for Kate's Law) ..

The "Muslim ban" was quickly walked back too - I think it took a little longer - around the convention
where he proposed "extreme vetting" from "terrorists countries" (sic)
Click to expand...

Sorry Cos but that is BULL SHIT!!!!

The man walked back?? How about a fuckin apology instead??

He has been on a non-stop rant-rage since the day he declared...............

So many, so often it is hard to keep them all straight.........

He is attacking Ryan & all those that have come out against him,
Miss universe 20 years ago,
all the women he diSSed,
Kahns
Vets
Muslims
Mexicans
media

Oh he did "walk back" his bull shit lies/birtherism, well sorta, like he sorted walked back the attacks on Mexicans, women, Muslims, Vets.........

Here is his morning:Trump’s Morning: Attack Biden, Female Accusers, Fellow Republicans, Electoral Integrity

My God man, he is relentless, non-stop, like a high school-er dropping Viagra & washing it down w/ vodka & rock stars.............
 
Stretch said:
Good point, the media wants Hillary, not Trump. It's not in the media's interest to serve 100% of the public at large and distribute the pure news anymore. You're right, why would they?

Thanks for the reminder...silly me, LOL.
Click to expand...

Yea, silly you......:whome:

They want to make money, that is what they do, that is why they are in "BUSINESS"......... They gave the dirty a billion in free press-not cause they like him, cause he makes them money.............

He says stupid stuff, they report stupid stuff he says=$$$ Is there something you don't get there???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top