Fears mount on the deplorable dirty's 'rigged election' rhetoric

anatta said:
naw. no-one willpay attention.
It will be pre-Gridloack & Executive order time from her highness =DC FUBAR as usual.
Click to expand...

I certainly hope you're right..........

While trumpf himself will not dare raise a pedicured little finger, some of his fans might..........:dunno:

She can get on w/ the Asian trade deal, which is part of the pivot??
 
domer76 said:
You poor, uninformed moron. The superdelegate system has been in place since the 80s. Long before Clinton came on the stage.

Popular vote? Clinton kicked Sander's ass.

Know what you're talking about before you post and make yourself look the fool.
Click to expand...

Poor Blabo
 
Bill said:
First bomb has already gone off: GOP office firebombed in N Carolina, warning painted nearby: Nazi Republicans get out

If trumpf is elected & these ppl are caught they will be tar & vetted, & publicly hung, maybe pay-purview... On the new trumpf network..
Click to expand...

Just ask yourself; Which candidate would gain politically if the GOP headquarters were firebombed?

trump-world-on-fire.gif



The answer is obvious.
Trumpf would be arresting his own people.
 
Bill said:
I certainly hope you're right..........

While trumpf himself will not dare raise a pedicured little finger, some of his fans might..........:dunno:

She can get on w/ the Asian trade deal, which is part of the pivot??
Click to expand...
who knows...Anything Clinton says/telegraphs is a matter of political convenience of the moment
 
Bill said:
I certainly hope you're right..........

While trumpf himself will not dare raise a pedicured little finger, some of his fans might..........:dunno:

She can get on w/ the Asian trade deal, which is part of the pivot??
Click to expand...

btw if the government already knows that there is inherent suspicion on the part of this election wouldnt it be on them to make sure everything is as transparent as possible? I mean its alredy being brought up by reporters. Im assuming the white house knows the political climate of the country as well. Having companies affiliated with Soros handling the vote counting will not help much.
 
tsuke said:
btw if the government already knows that there is inherent suspicion on the part of this election wouldnt it be on them to make sure everything is as transparent as possible? I mean its alredy being brought up by reporters. Im assuming the white house knows the political climate of the country as well. Having companies affiliated with Soros handling the vote counting will not help much.
Click to expand...

Can you show that this election is "rigged"
I will understand when you can't.
 
Leonthecat said:
Can you show that this election is "rigged"
I will understand when you can't.
Click to expand...

That is the impression people have. Again it is an impression. A perception people have on things. Given that this is the case would the onus not be on the federal govt to show that it is not so by being more transparent?
 
tsuke said:
That is the impression people have. Again it is an impression. A perception people have on things. Given that this is the case would the onus not be on the federal govt to show that it is not so by being more transparent?
Click to expand...

It's arguable that it's 'rigged' in the sense the media has abandoned honest journalism in favor of an electoral outcome. I don't think that's even debatable.

To be rigged in a formal sense, the outcome would be guaranteed. But I don't think that's what Trump was talking about.

There's no guaranteed outcome in this race.
 
You really don't have to look further than Trump's "rigged" rhetoric to understand that he's not about making America great again.

Trump is about Trump. Trump has always been about Trump, and he will always be about Trump.

If he doesn't win, he doesn't care about America being great. He will just as happily burn the country down.
 
Thing1 said:
You really don't have to look further than Trump's "rigged" rhetoric to understand that he's not about making America great again.

Trump is about Trump. Trump has always been about Trump, and he will always be about Trump.

If he doesn't win, he doesn't care about America being great. He will just as happily burn the country down.
Click to expand...

You don't find it even mildly disturbing that the media, openly, opposes one candidate in favor of another?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
You don't find it even mildly disturbing that the media, openly, opposes one candidate in favor of another?
Click to expand...

What media are you talking about? I think that's true of MSNBC, and portions of CNN. It's not true of Fox, or talk radio (and yes - that's media). Like any election, people are taking sides. It's been that way for a long time now.

You guys are really overplaying the "victim card" on that one. The media MADE Trump, and gave him the GOP nomination. One estimate had it at over $2 billion in free advertising that he received. He'd be nothing without the media.
 
Thing1 said:
What media are you talking about? I think that's true of MSNBC, and portions of CNN. It's not true of Fox, or talk radio (and yes - that's media). Like any election, people are taking sides. It's been that way for a long time now.

You guys are really overplaying the "victim card" on that one. The media MADE Trump, and gave him the GOP nomination. One estimate had it at over $2 billion in free advertising that he received. He'd be nothing without the media.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the establishment media---like the NYT link you didn't address. That's a remarkable concession for them. There's never been anything like it, this isn't media bias business as usual. The bulk of the media is *actively engaged* in trying to affect an electoral outcome.

CNN---in the tank for Hillary. MSNBC---laughably in the tank for Her Heinous. CBS---Team Hillary. WashPO---Team Hillary. Trump has Sean Hannity on Fox News.

Krauthammer doesn't like Trump. Megan Kelly hates him. Steve Hayes manages to be a journalist and play it down the middle. And it's hard to tell the National Review from HuffPo when the subject is Trump.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
I'm talking about the establishment media---like the NYT link you didn't address. That's a remarkable concession for them. There's never been anything like it, this isn't media bias business as usual. The bulk of the media is *actively engaged* in trying to affect an electoral outcome.

CNN---in the tank for Hillary. MSNBC---laughably in the tank for Her Heinous. CBS---Team Hillary. WashPO---Team Hillary. Trump has Sean Hannity on Fox News.

Krauthammer doesn't like Trump. Megan Kelly hates him. Steve Hayes manages to be a journalist and play it down the middle. And it's hard to tell the National Review from HuffPo when the subject is Trump.
Click to expand...

The individuals you mention all have opinion-based shows. They're supposed to render opinion.

Fox NEWS is still a campaign arm for the GOP, just as MSNBC is for Dems. You're wrong about CNN; they have more opinion shows that are slanted against Trump, but their actual news coverage is as close to the middle as a network gets. The NY Times has always been a liberal paper, just like the Washington Times is conservative.

Why do you limit your analysis to "establishment" media? I'm not even sure what that term means anymore when talk radio garners so many listeners. How many more millions need to listen to talk radio before it becomes "establishment"? It certainly isn't fringe.

Regardless, it's a whine. And you're whining about it because Trump is whining about it. And Trump is whining about it after the "rigged" media gave him $2 billion in free advertising and the GOP nomination.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top