Thing, if you remember try to block her from future threads.
She clearly has either bi-polar or mental instabilities. Something is just not right with her.
how well has hiding from facts helped your party so far idiot?
you got trumped
I'll give her one - my most "conservative position": I believe 100% in privatizing Social Security, which I'm sure desh sees as evil.
I think it's a shame that privatizing got framed as a conservative position. To me, it's a very progressive approach to fixing SS for future generations.
Man....I'd think that through a little more Thingy.....privatizing would mean some entity would be out to make a profit for managing it and the scam artists would be
circling like vultures.....and who is going to have oversight over how its managed....more vultures ?.......At first I too thought it might be a good change, but not any more.....
Even the gov. DOJ with all its lawyers can't get an handle on the EPA, the IRS, the VA, etc.....we can't really trust anybody in Wash. DC to do an honest job anymore.....
nobody gets fired or is held responsible for fucking things up....they seem to only get bonuses for it.....
Man....I'd think that through a little more Thingy.....privatizing would mean some entity would be out to make a profit for managing it and the scam artists would be
circling like vultures.....and who is going to have oversight over how its managed....more vultures ?.......At first I too thought it might be a good change, but not any more.....
Even the gov. DOJ with all its lawyers can't get an handle on the EPA, the IRS, the VA, etc.....we can't really trust anybody in Wash. DC to do an honest job anymore.....
nobody gets fired or is held responsible for fucking things up....they seem to only get bonuses for it.....
I lean far left
And I'm for privatizing
It's clearly a Ponzi scheme
You get less than 1 percent on your money
Duh
And with over 300 million people, you have to expect a few nutters once in awhile.
We empower terrorists with our overblown fear of them. All it takes is a shooting like San Bernandino, and it practically paralyzes us as a nation. For terrorists that have VERY limited capability to attack us on any larger scale, that's the best thing they could hope for.
Exactly. It IS a Ponzi scheme. It makes no sense mathematically. Why settle for 1% return when seniors could be looking at 4-5%, conservatively? It would be such a benefit.
This surprises me.
If people are in it for profit, good. They'll do a better job, unless they're just taking the money - and that's something that can be regulated at far less cost than the current SS admin.
The bottom line is this: SS is not built to survive long-term. Even the most ardent privatization opponents concede that by 2037, we'd need to make a 25% cut in payouts. Can you imagine that year for seniors, and what kind out outcry there will be?
I'm taking less at 62
They will inevitably reduce benefits
Especially to the wealthy
Raise the taxable amount to $300,000
Why limit it at all....done right now could bring down the payroll tax rate for everyone if there was no cut off.....
We need a revolutionary government to assure the continuation of democratic rule.
Why limit it at all....done right now could bring down the payroll tax rate for everyone if there was no cut off.....
I missed your qualifications