evince
Truthmatters
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ial-election-loses-donald-trump-a7488011.html
FBI search warrant blamed for costing Hillary Clinton presidential election 'should never have been granted'
Bureau facing fresh pressure after lawyers say*new documents reveal no reason for reopening investigation
The warrant, used by agents to access emails*between Ms Clinton and her adviser Huma Abedin,*was issued just nine days before the election and turned the race on its head.
It has been credited with helping Donald Trump*catch up with*and then overtake*Ms Clinton at a time when she was ahead in the polls.*The FBI’s decision to announce the new search triggered a huge backlash from lawyers, Justice Department officials and Clinton supporters.*
Read more
FBI search warrant into Hillary Clinton emails unsealed
The original warrant that gave investigators*permission to search the emails was unsealed on Tuesday after a Los Angeles lawyer sued for its release. Its contents led some lawyers to claim the*FBI should not have been allowed to carry out the search.
The new documents*reveal*FBI agents secured the warrant after assuring a federal judge there was “probable cause” to believe the emails, contained on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, a former US congressman and estranged husband of Ms*Abedin, contained illegal and classified materials.*
In a signed affidavit, an FBI agent wrote: “There is probable cause to believe the subject laptop contains evidence, contraband, fruits, and/or other items illegally possessed in violation of [US law].*
“There is also probable cause to believe that the correspondence between them located on the subject laptop contains classified information which was produced by and is owned by the U.S. government.”
However, legal experts questioned why the judge had agreed there was “probable*cause” to suspect wrongdoing, given the lack of justification provided by the FBI.
Read more
Clinton won nearly 3 million votes more than Trump, final tally shows
E. Randol Schoenberg, the lawyer who secured the release of the documents, said after reviewing them he was “appalled” the warrant was granted.
He said: “I see nothing at all in the search warrant application that would give rise to probable cause, nothing that would make anyone suspect that there was anything on the laptop beyond what the FBI had already searched and determined not to be evidence of a crime, nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between Secretary Clinton and her longtime aide Huma Abedin.”
FBI search warrant blamed for costing Hillary Clinton presidential election 'should never have been granted'
Bureau facing fresh pressure after lawyers say*new documents reveal no reason for reopening investigation
The warrant, used by agents to access emails*between Ms Clinton and her adviser Huma Abedin,*was issued just nine days before the election and turned the race on its head.
It has been credited with helping Donald Trump*catch up with*and then overtake*Ms Clinton at a time when she was ahead in the polls.*The FBI’s decision to announce the new search triggered a huge backlash from lawyers, Justice Department officials and Clinton supporters.*
Read more
FBI search warrant into Hillary Clinton emails unsealed
The original warrant that gave investigators*permission to search the emails was unsealed on Tuesday after a Los Angeles lawyer sued for its release. Its contents led some lawyers to claim the*FBI should not have been allowed to carry out the search.
The new documents*reveal*FBI agents secured the warrant after assuring a federal judge there was “probable cause” to believe the emails, contained on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, a former US congressman and estranged husband of Ms*Abedin, contained illegal and classified materials.*
In a signed affidavit, an FBI agent wrote: “There is probable cause to believe the subject laptop contains evidence, contraband, fruits, and/or other items illegally possessed in violation of [US law].*
“There is also probable cause to believe that the correspondence between them located on the subject laptop contains classified information which was produced by and is owned by the U.S. government.”
However, legal experts questioned why the judge had agreed there was “probable*cause” to suspect wrongdoing, given the lack of justification provided by the FBI.
Read more
Clinton won nearly 3 million votes more than Trump, final tally shows
E. Randol Schoenberg, the lawyer who secured the release of the documents, said after reviewing them he was “appalled” the warrant was granted.
He said: “I see nothing at all in the search warrant application that would give rise to probable cause, nothing that would make anyone suspect that there was anything on the laptop beyond what the FBI had already searched and determined not to be evidence of a crime, nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between Secretary Clinton and her longtime aide Huma Abedin.”
And trump's law-breaking makes him a....?