FBI raid on a former President without the permission of the current President or the

Cypress said:
We don't live in Stalinist Russia. The head of state does not authorize arrests or searches.

Criminal investigation by America's law enforcement agencies are conducted independently of Biden's approval.
Click to expand...
There is a difference between being aware of and authorising. One would think that a raid on your former opponent and presumed future opponent would rise to the level of being informed at the very least..
 
Yakuda said:
Prove he stole them.
Click to expand...

How did he have them in his possession since the law says he was supposed to turn them over to the National Archive before Jan 22, 2021? Did they just happen to fall into his pocket like that candy bar you demanded the store clerk prove you stole?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
If true it is just proof that Biden is running the government the way he is supposed. Presidents are not supposed to decide who will get arrested or who will have a warrant to search their home.

The fact that you think running the government the correct way is evidence of dementia would seem to point ot evidence of your dementia since you can't remember how the government is supposed to function.
Click to expand...
The President is supposed to get a heads up on things like this in his daily briefing. I guess Biden was having his diaper changed cand misses it.
 
ExpressLane said:
The President is supposed to get a heads up on things like this in his daily briefing. I guess Biden was having his diaper changed cand misses it.
Click to expand...

The President is supposed to be told what warrants have been issued in Florida in his daily briefing? Care to tell us if that occurred when Trump was President.
 
floridafan said:
How else would he be in possession of documents they were never supposed to leave the WH.
Click to expand...

Well first his having them isn't proof of his having stolen them. Next yesterday someone posted an article that said the National Archive arranged to have them sent to trump.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
How did he have them in his possession since the law says he was supposed to turn them over to the National Archive before Jan 22, 2021? Did they just happen to fall into his pocket like that candy bar you demanded the store clerk prove you stole?
Click to expand...

The National Archive arranged to have them sent as was posted in an article by someone yesterday I believe it was.
 
ExpressLane said:
There is a difference between being aware of and authorising. One would think that a raid on your former opponent and presumed future opponent would rise to the level of being informed at the very least..
Click to expand...

That is exactly why the DOJ remains independent of the White House you fucking know nothing traitor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top