FBI Knew Boulder, Colorado, Suspect Identity Prior to Shooting

LV426 said:
You can't either.

You're trying to insist that your tortured interpretation of what people said 250 years ago is the objective standard and you've done nothing to earn that distinction.

The best you've been able to do is copy and paste articles OTHER PEOPLE WROTE who came to the conclusion for you, so you didn't have to do that thinking yourself.
Click to expand...

Fuck off, you gun-grabber POS! Come and try to take..my friend's and see what happens. :awesome:

I'll be off to the side and out of sight with my bow, just in case it looks like you're going to succeed. Then I'll arrow you right through your fucking head.
Instant stop.
 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
ignorance doesn't make your theory correct.
Click to expand...

It's not a theory, it's fact.

You are more likely to harm yourself or others than you ever will use the gun in self defense.

And since you have stated that you want mentally ill people to get guns uninfringed, I would consider you one of those people who is very likely to harm yourself or others with your weapon, that you can barely use.
 
LV426 said:
You will never be able to defeat the state with your shitty little gun.

You couldn't do it 160 years ago, and you won't be able to do it today.
Click to expand...

you obviously don't understand number theory either. when 10 million people go against 4 million people.......who wins?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
This is what I'm talking about.

If background checks, assault weapon bans, and licensing requirements for urban district handgun carrying all continue to be considered in non-compliance with the 2nd Amendment,
a serious end run around the 2nd Amendment will be attempted and could even possibly succeed.

The most unreasonable 2nd Amendment advocates will be the ones responsible for bringing down a uniquely American historical right.
Click to expand...

or restoring a constitutional republic
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I grew up with guns, was trained with guns in USMC, have owned guns all my life
Click to expand...

So did Steven Paddock and he killed 60 people with his gun.

So how are you different from him?


i've used them in self defense of myself and others in the past
Click to expand...

Bullshit.


you just need to sack up and admit you don't know what you're talking about
Click to expand...

You make shit up about yourself, and for the parts you don't make up, you exaggerate and embellish.

Like how you call yourself a Marine, but conveniently leave out the fact that you never fired your weapon once and that your job was to sit on your fat ass all day and stare at a screen.
 
LV426 said:
So if we can't rely on "good guys with guns" to rescue us from "bad guys with guns", then "good guys with guns" is a fallacy.
Click to expand...
so why do governments arm their enforcers?

LV426 said:
You're not a "good guy" if you're not willing to use your gun against the "bad guys".
Click to expand...
just the other day, geeko demanded I not do a damn thing to rescue him...........others in my wide circle have said the same. would YOU want me coming to your rescue with a gun?
 
LV426 said:
Chicago has no way of stopping the Iron Pipeline because states like IN, KY, and WI have lax gun laws and guns are just trafficked into Chicago from there.

Gary, IN is 30 minutes from Downtown Chicago.
Click to expand...

GUN TRACE REPORT From the office of the Mayor says u are WRONG

SOURCE DEALERS FOR CRIME GUNS RECOVERED IN CHICAGO

Seven of the top ten source dealers are within Illinois, and six of those seven fall within the Cook County suburbs that
border Chicago. The remaining FFL source dealers within the top ten are located in northwest Indiana. Collectively, these
ten source dealers make up almost a quarter of the crime guns recovered in Chicago, despite the existence of many other
federally licensed dealers in Chicago’s vicinity.

For the better part of a decade, Chuck’s Gun Shop and Midwest Sporting Goods have consistently remained the top
two FFL source dealers for crime guns recovered by police in Chicago

https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam... Room/Press Releases/2017/October/GTR2017.pdf

Do u know where Chuck’s Gun Shop is? IDIOT
 
LV426 said:
You can't either.

You're trying to insist that your tortured interpretation of what people said 250 years ago is the objective standard and you've done nothing to earn that distinction.

The best you've been able to do is copy and paste articles OTHER PEOPLE WROTE who came to the conclusion for you, so you didn't have to do that thinking yourself.
Click to expand...

I gave you DIRECT quotes. how is that my interpretation?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if you live in the rural North East US, upper midwest, or northwest pacific states, they are.
Click to expand...

No they're not.

Just because there are bears there doesn't mean there are bear attacks.

How many bear attacks a year? Because we get about 300 mass shootings a year.
 
LV426 said:
It's not a theory, it's fact.

You are more likely to harm yourself or others than you ever will use the gun in self defense.

And since you have stated that you want mentally ill people to get guns uninfringed, I would consider you one of those people who is very likely to harm yourself or others with your weapon, that you can barely use.
Click to expand...

your 'theory' that you adopted from another author has been debunked dozens of time. and luckily, your opinion of my mental state has no bearing on my rights nor of my proficiency with weapons. I daresay I'm for more lethally proficient with weapons than you will ever be.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I provided founding fathers quotes.
Click to expand...

What you provided was Heritage's interpretation of those quotes.

You didn't provide the full quotes, just cherry picked parts of them because you are not an honest person.

That's why you haven't linked to them.


commentary from the ratification era, as well as several state and federal court case opinions.......all verifiable that proves what i've said.
Click to expand...

Sure, because it's cherry picked because good faith isn't something you traffic in.
 
LV426 said:
No they're not.

Just because there are bears there doesn't mean there are bear attacks.

How many bear attacks a year? Because we get about 300 mass shootings a year.
Click to expand...

So people should not be able to defend against bears in their homes now?
Fuck your commie ass with a cactus, bitch!

I tell ya what, the number of bear attacks is less than ANTIFA, BLM, and rioters.
Happy now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top