FBI: Hillary Clinton Broke the Law, We Just Don’t Really Care

anatta said:
here's an idea. instead of vague reference to site - link the appropriate site, and c/p the relevant points.
Then use that as a basis to convey your own ideas.
Click to expand...

I don't that I've ever seen him do that, yet he claims to have an 99th percentile IQ.

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
anatta said:
your "ideas" fall apart like a paper mâché piñata; solely wacked for a convenient pleasure when desired.

words of steel?? WTF? you can barely grunt out a funked up incoherent phrase.
look at what you are praising:

At least you got that much right- Hilary is a wall st warmongering whore.
The fact ANYONE would look to her for "women's empowerment" is an indictment of modern feminism/PC idiocy.
Click to expand...

Rune is a seriously unhinged, seriously!

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
Darla said:
It's red-hot rage.

As someone screamed out at Trump's rally today:

HANG THE BITCH

It's not really coherent, and it's never-ending.

I can assure you it has nothing to do with her being a woman though, in case that's what you were thinking.
Click to expand...

It actually has everything to do with her being a Clinton. If it was Carly vs Hillary every conservative on here would be saying the same things they are now.
 
Islam Sucks said:
No it does not.
Click to expand...

This is actually amusing when you think about it lol.

To prove intent in this instance you nearly have to be in someone's head. Or, there would have to be evidence where the fact they were getting ready to break the law was discussed and/or showing blatant disregard for the potential harm it would cause. [purposefully removing classified letter heads does all of that but I'm trying to make a point]

So, Comer said there's insufficient evidence of intent. But this implies ignorance on Hillary's part if knowledge of the laws pertaining to handling classified information are required. And if that's the case, she shouldn't be handling it and should have her security clearance removed.

Which would put her out of the race.

At any rate, Hillary's JPP defenders have to settle for the fact Hillary wasn't charged by the FBI, but she's stupid and has no business handling classified information and should probably be prevented from doing so in the future.

Hillary should be charged with malicious ignorance lol.
 
anatta said:
your "ideas" fall apart like a paper mâché piñata; solely wacked for a convenient pleasure when desired.

words of steel?? WTF? you can barely grunt out a funked up incoherent phrase.
look at what you are praising:

At least you got that much right- Hilary is a wall st warmongering whore.
The fact ANYONE would look to her for "women's empowerment" is an indictment of modern feminism/PC idiocy.
Click to expand...
I am not praising anything you fucking imbecile. I wad.trying to keep you off suicide watch.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
This is actually amusing when you think about it lol.

To prove intent in this instance you nearly have to be in someone's head. Or, there would have to be evidence where the fact they were getting ready to break the law was discussed and/or showing blatant disregard for the potential harm it would cause. [purposefully removing classified letter heads does all of that but I'm trying to make a point]

So, Comer said there's insufficient evidence of intent. But this implies ignorance on Hillary's part if knowledge of the laws pertaining to handling classified information are required. And if that's the case, she shouldn't be handling it and should have her security clearance removed.

Which would put her out of the race.

At any rate, Hillary's JPP defenders have to settle for the fact Hillary wasn't charged by the FBI, but she's stupid and has no business handling classified information and should probably be prevented from doing so in the future.

Hillary should be charged with malicious ignorance lol.
Click to expand...

I hope the GOP doesn't act stupid and just takes Comey's words as they are and say "Comey showed Crooked Hillary has no business getting classified information. Comey essentially disqualified her from being President in a rational world"
 
I wonder if Cunt Darcula would have trusted her sordid relationship with Rune on Crooked Hillarys server? Couldn't have been worse than trusting KKKhristiefan
 
anatta said:
it's accurate -not hyperbolic. She's lied from the first day her Emails were released.. It has nothing to do with not being the first Sec.to use private Email.
You seriously need to read todays Comey's statement and the State Dept's IG report..
don't take anyone's word on it till you read them for yourself.
Click to expand...

Talk about fucking arogance; Thing disagrees with you so he must not have read the report.

Get a grip loser.
Your year long attempt to discredit Hillary has failed miserably AND she can take every penny you own for your slander.
 
Rune said:
Talk about fucking arogance; Thing disagrees with you so he must not have read the report.

Get a grip loser.
Your year long attempt to discredit Hillary has failed miserably AND she can take every penny you own for your slander.
Click to expand...

You have lost your mind. Crooked Hillary has no basis to sue for slander. What an idiot.

Bwahahahahahahahahahhahhahaha
 
Thing1 said:
The bolded is just a bit hyperbolic.

There's just something about Hillary. She's not the 1st SOS to use private email. This whole thing is the very definition of "overblown."
Click to expand...

Then we have a bigger problem with lawlessness in DC than most people are aware of.

That's also an amusing statement coming from someone who consistently hyperbolizes over Trump lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top