False outrage against HRC?

NOVA said:
How do you know there is.....there is no double standard here.....there is nothing to even suggest any wrong doing with Emails and Bush.....you making unfounded claims and accusations and implying wrongdoing where none exists is your problem.....

Email was pretty popular during Clinton's second term....how come there is none?....were they destroyed? .......what was he hiding?......

See how stupid that sounds .......
Click to expand...

I'm not implying anything. I'm saying flat-out that the bush WH did something illegal.

Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost.

The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee and were only supposed to be used for dealing with non-administration political campaign work to avoid violating ethics laws. Yet congressional investigators already had evidence private emails had been used for government business, including to discuss the firing of one of the U.S. attorneys. The RNC accounts were used by 22 White House staffers, including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, who reportedly used his RNC email for 95 percent of his communications.

As the Washington Post reported, “Under federal law, the White House is required to maintain records, including e-mails, involving presidential decision- making and deliberations.” But suddenly millions of the private RNC emails had gone missing; emails that were seen as potentially crucial evidence by Congressional investigators."

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the...the_media_has_conveniently_forgotten_partner/
 
NOVA said:
Did she make an effort to send help.....did she make an effort to supply more security when it was asked for?

She NEVER claimed to have requested that help be sent to the men under attack....that was surely within her power as Sec. Of State.
Click to expand...

More false outrage, you're going to make up anything you can. This is why you people don't win, you are always outraged by every action ademocrat with power takes.

Did GWB ask that help be sent into the pentagon after it was attacked? Why weren't you screaming about his inaction?
 
christiefan915 said:
I'm not implying anything. I'm saying flat-out that the bush WH did something illegal.

Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost.

The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee and were only supposed to be used for dealing with non-administration political campaign work to avoid violating ethics laws. Yet congressional investigators already had evidence private emails had been used for government business, including to discuss the firing of one of the U.S. attorneys. The RNC accounts were used by 22 White House staffers, including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, who reportedly used his RNC email for 95 percent of his communications.

As the Washington Post reported, “Under federal law, the White House is required to maintain records, including e-mails, involving presidential decision- making and deliberations.” But suddenly millions of the private RNC emails had gone missing; emails that were seen as potentially crucial evidence by Congressional investigators."

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the...the_media_has_conveniently_forgotten_partner/
Click to expand...

the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys ?......Just as Bill Clinton did, with what, about 70 US Attorneys ?, I don't remember the exact #


Emails on a private server not used for official work.....

Your artical says "Clinton has said she deleted about 50,000 emails that dealt with personal matters, citing her daughter’s wedding and her mother’s funeral as examples. All the correspondence pertaining to official business was turned over to archived by State. The deletion of the emails, though perfectly legal, has excited House Republicans....

deletion of the emails, perfectly legal for Hillary who used only ONE private server for everything, but not for Rove whose private server was used for political correspondence that is
expressly prohibited on gov. systems....


Hardly a security risk to the country or intelligence matters, as Hillary's has proved to be......
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
More false outrage, you're going to make up anything you can. This is why you people don't win, you are always outraged by every action ademocrat with power takes.

Did GWB ask that help be sent into the pentagon after it was attacked? Why weren't you screaming about his inaction?
Click to expand...

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...lpable-for-benghazi-from-beginning-to-end.php

uh the Pentagon has plenty of force on hand thanks. Now this is just my opinion, but you are trying to defend the not defend-able. She has been corrupt for 40 years.
 
Jarod said:
More false outrage, you're going to make up anything you can. This is why you people don't win, you are always outraged by every action ademocrat with power takes.

Did GWB ask that help be sent into the pentagon after it was attacked? Why weren't you screaming about his inaction?
Click to expand...

The Pentagon was attacked ?.....when was that? and Bush didn't send in the 6th Fleet?
 
I love this "they did it too defense".......its so lame, but so entertaining.....and revealing in a way....

but then, so pathetic too.
 
Jarod said:
1) The facts show that it didn't happen.
2) Even if it had happened, she has no authority over that issue. How could she have anything to do with it?
Click to expand...
1. not really. not really facts. the absense of truth is at the heart of this thing.
2. its called collaborating with those who do.
 
NOVA said:
the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys ?......Just as Bill Clinton did, with what, about 70 US Attorneys ?, I don't remember the exact #

Emails on a private server not used for official work.....

Your artical says "Clinton has said she deleted about 50,000 emails that dealt with personal matters, citing her daughter’s wedding and her mother’s funeral as examples. All the correspondence pertaining to official business was turned over to archived by State. The deletion of the emails, though perfectly legal, has excited House Republicans....

deletion of the emails, perfectly legal for Hillary who used only ONE private server for everything, but not for Rove whose private server was used for political correspondence that isexpressly prohibited on gov. systems....

Hardly a security risk to the country or intelligence matters, as Hillary's has proved to be......
Click to expand...

I'll let the experts speak about Clinton v. bush firings.

"Although Bush and President Bill Clinton each dismissed nearly all U.S. attorneys upon taking office, legal experts and former prosecutors say the firing of a large number of prosecutors in the middle of a term appears to be unprecedented and threatens the independence of prosecutors."

McClatchy explained it like this: "Mass firings of U.S. attorneys are fairly common when a new president takes office, but not in a second-term administration. Prosecutors are usually appointed for four-year terms, but they are usually allowed to stay on the job if the president who appointed them is re-elected."

"It is true that Janet Reno, as her predecessors before her had done, asked for the resignations of U.S. Attorneys. This is standard operating procedure designed to allow the President to have in place his own federal prosecutors. What is different about this current episode is that a Republican White House sought to replace Republican-appointed federal prosecutors mid-stream who were by all accounts doing precisely what they had been asked to do. We now know, from last week's testimony, why in some cases this was so and the answers we got make it clear that the reasons were not high-minded or lofty."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/so-is-this-us-attorney-purge-unprecedented-or-not/
 
NOVA said:
I love this "they did it too defense".......its so lame, but so entertaining.....and revealing in a way....

but then, so pathetic too.
Click to expand...
except that 'they' didnt do it. so they dont comprehend the issue with HRC yet they go on and on about how she did nothing. its really scary if J-Rod is actually a lawyer. he quite literally knows better. but he's just attempting to blur things to produce a reasonable doubt. only HRC is not a client.
 
christiefan915 said:
How do you know there was nothing top secret on bush's server? Pretty suspicious that they'd be destroyed. But the main point is the double standard of the right.
Click to expand...

for there to be a double standard we would have had to find the emails that were supposedly destroyed, discovered they were top secret instead of personal, and have had some reason to look at them in the first place.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top