Are you saying it was Al Queda who attacked us in Benghazi?
False Benghazi outrage?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Are you saying it was Al Queda who attacked us in Benghazi?
Show me a quote where a Democrat said "there is no doubt..."
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Al Queda is our friend and ally.
Benghazi attack: Libya’s Green Resistance did it … and NATO powers are covering up
US ambassador’s killing had nothing to do with Al Qaeda, Islamist blowback or anti-Islamic video
The NATO powers and the bureaucrats they installed in Libya want you to think that all 5.6 million Libyans are happy that NATO and its proxy terrorists destroyed Libya, a country which under Qaddafi had the highest standard of living in Africa.
They want you to think that NATO brought “freedom and democracy” to Libya, not chaos and death.
They want you to think that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO imperialists or NATO’s Islamist allies in Benghazi.
In reality, the Resistance has been increasingly active since shortly after the murder of Muammar Qaddafi in October 2011, as will be shown below. They strike any NATO target they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Qaddafi and sided with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against what they see as NATO’s illegal occupation of their country.
---
They all admitted the truth at first
The morning after the Benghazi attack, on Sept. 12, the NATO puppets unwittingly admitted the truth about the “Tahloob” (Green Resistance) and whined that NATO was not doing enough to help crush it. Libyan Deputy Interior Minister Wanis Al Sharif admitted this in a Benghazi news conference, which was later broadcast on Al Jazeera television
---
As the growing Resistance illustrates, the Western powers did not “liberate” Libya; they invaded a sovereign country and killed massively to execute their real, criminal agenda of regime change and theft of oil resources. Now the people of Libya are resisting this criminal conquest. And that damning truth has to be expunged at all costs.
Before the Benghazi incident, the corporate media had occasionally mentioned Qaddafi loyalists. After the incident, all such mention has suddenly ceased. The media say that “extremists” attacked the U.S. site in Benghazi. Or “Al Qaeda” or “Islamists” or “terrorists” or “protesters” – anyone but the Resistance.
Not true. The Green Resistance lives, and furthermore it is only getting started.
http://sfbayview.com/2012/benghazi-...tance-did-it-and-nato-powers-are-covering-up/
Libya official says Gaddafi loyalists killed U.S. diplomats
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/12/us-libya-usa-attack-loyalists-idUSBRE88B0K920120912
Libya official says Gaddafi loyalists killed US diplomats
http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/li...-loyalists-killed-us-diplomats-104805571.html
You want to know what Benghazi is all about .. there it is.
Al Queda is our friend and ally .. that's why Stevens was in Benghazi, the world's hotbed of terrorism .. and not in Tripoli, the capital. He thought Al Queda would protect him.
So still no allegation that Al Queda was behind Benghazi.
I though it was common knowledge that a branch of Al Queda was ON OUR SIDE regarding Libya.
ok, so now one persons opinion that it was a group sympathetic to AlQueda, still no allegations that it was AQ.
Because they weren't. Another, even smaller group, claimed responsibility. Interesting side note: The same group denied responsibility immediately after the attack, which helped lead some to the supposition that it might have been tied to the video.
The problem with dealing with situations like this is that in supporting rebel factions, we don't always know who's who. In the case of Libya, we didn't furnish weapons to the rebels, they were coming from Qatar and Saudi Arabia and consisted of handguns and grenades; who sometimes sent them to far more radical groups than wanted. We furnished the money. The administration found this out and raised hell.
Note, however, no evidence has shown that any of these weapons were used against us in Benghazi, as much as the conspiricists wish.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/w...-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all
Look...Sometimes it's difficult to make the right call, and Obama's not God. Chill. To the critics of the president: If you don't like the way our government's managed, run for office. We'll see how you do.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
And here you are, closing your eyes, flailing your hands around, and screaming "I don't see it".
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
That doesn't send chills down your spine brother?
How can the war on terror be real if Al Qaeda is on our side?
My question to you is, do you REALLY want to know where the cover-up is? Respectfully, I don't think you do.
There was a civil war going on between the Libyan government and people against Al Qaeda .. and we chose the side of Al Qaeda.
Guess what else?
The CIA’s ties to the Gaddafi regime
SEPTEMBER 3, 2011
http://warincontext.org/2011/09/03/the-cias-ties-to-the-gaddafi-regime/
Guess what else?
Both Parties Are Trying to Sweep the Bigger Story Under the Rug
According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi
more
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013...azi-without-talking-about-the-syrian-war.html
You think it's just a wirch hunt .. but only now are the rea; questions being asked by MSM .. such as, why was the US Ambassador in Bengazi, the world's hotbed of terrorists, on 9/11 in what was essentially a CIA outpost?
Was it this .. you should watch the video
Testimony: Stevens Went to Benghazi Mission on 9/11/12 So Clinton Could Announce on Upcoming Libyan Visit It Had Become Permanent U.S. Post
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/tes...112-so-clinton-could-announce-upcoming-libyan
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Damn brother .. at one time, you were smart. Today, you've been reduced to a clown. Far too many democrats have suffered the same fate. Totally mind-fucked.
Did you happen to see this in my post .. you should watch the video
The video is of a congressional hearing. So if the hearing is real .. what difference does it make who publishes it?
You feel stupid now, huh?
You should.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Unfortunately too many on the left have gotten too used to circling the wagons for the administration. Sadly the right is guilty of it too. It is more about naked power than what is right for the country.
I suspect that you and I will always disagree on the appropriate direction for the country, but I do respect your faithfulness to the truth regardless of source and who it impacts.
Kudos sir.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Thank you
What I bolded I think is very well said.
Hopefully you can remain equally respectful when I just as vehemently disagree with your perspectives .. particularly on race. Civil disagreement is appreciated.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Water under the bridge as far as I am concerned. I apologize for my previous behavior towards you. I do respect your honesty.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
One thing that isn't being discussed in this thread is its premise. Jarod calls it false outrage.
Forget for a second the nuances of who said what, when.
Why is it not legitimate to be outraged at the fact that a US Ambassador was killed by Al Queda terrorists. Just that on its face is worthy of outrage.
It isn't like a US Ambassador being killed is a routine occurrence.
Yes, I get that in today's 24/7 news cycle everything is looked at through a partisan lens of how an event helps/hurts the other political side, and I am as guilty of that as anyone. But, shouldn't everyone in the country be outraged that a US Ambassador was murdered by terrorists?
Forget for a second the nuances of who said what, when.
Why is it not legitimate to be outraged at the fact that a US Ambassador was killed by Al Queda terrorists. Just that on its face is worthy of outrage.
It isn't like a US Ambassador being killed is a routine occurrence.
Yes, I get that in today's 24/7 news cycle everything is looked at through a partisan lens of how an event helps/hurts the other political side, and I am as guilty of that as anyone. But, shouldn't everyone in the country be outraged that a US Ambassador was murdered by terrorists?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's false outrage on the part of many because it is strictly partisan. It is only outrageous to them because Obama is President.
It would be silly not to acknowledge that.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Which news agency was it that just flubbed a big part of this story? Oh yeah, ABC.
Now how have CBS, CNN, NBC, MSNBC and FOX been doing in the last year?
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I am sure there is some of that at play. Would you also admit that the converse is true and some on the left refuse to look at the facts for similar partisan reasons and their love for Obama?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
What is there to admit? There are hacks on both sides. The only person who I have seen deny that is bravo.
What I find egregious about this particular instance of false outrage is that it is coming from a bunch of folks who were not only quiet, but cheered a scandal that was so much larger in scale that it's not even worth comparing when Bush was Prez.