I'm going to disagree but only because I have a degree (or two or three) in the sciences and I've read a lot of the science and it lines up with how physical systems work.
I'm sure you have your reasons for not believing the science. What are they?
Extremely high heat in the South....Was this caused by Man-Made gases and Cow Farts?
- Thread starter Libhater
- Start date
I'm going to disagree but only because I have a degree (or two or three) in the sciences and I've read a lot of the science and it lines up with how physical systems work.
I'm sure you have your reasons for not believing the science. What are they?
MAGA
Verified User
Rush Limbaugh use to love to get quotes from so-called experts in the 1960's and 1970's saying the world will be destroyed in 25 years. LOL.
All the old stupidities and old fear mongering are regurgitated for new generations of dopey retarded Leftists
So you are telling us that you don't understand the science of climate change but you know you don't believe it?
Do you do MANY things in life that way?
MAGA
Verified User
How many graduates of colleges in the Soviet Union for decades got degrees in political science and economics?
They were all worth shit and piss, thousands of them.
American colleges these days are known for substituting facts with Leftist ideology.
Your "degree" doesn't mean shit.
I believe real science, not your fake junk science.
You tell me something: Are homosexuals normal or is same-sex attraction a mental disorder? And please, oh please, I do hope you quote the APA and the DSM so I can totally destroy your ass.
So you can't tell us what it is about climate science you disagree with?
I'm not surprised. You probably don't even know how the greenhouse effect works or how greenhouse gases work or any of that stuff.
Too bad, it's interesting. WIsh you were capable of understandning science.
MAGA
Verified User
In a nutshell, man is not the cause of any problematic climate change. The climate changes on its own. Its has for mi9llions of years. A single volcano explosion will do more harm at once than man has done for years.
But most importantly: "Manmade climate change" is a tool of closet Marxists in order to destroy capitalism and bring about world socialism. If you think that is nutty, then you explain why communist and anti-capitalist signs are at every climate change protest.
Now we have something to work with:
1) volcanoes do, indeed, provide a useful system that interestingly enough PROVES climate change. In climate science there is something called "CLIMATE SENSITIVITY", this is how much the temperature increases with a given increase in the amount of a greenhouse gas. It's sometimes difficult to assess what the actual climate sensitivity for a given greenhouse gas is. But once we know that we know how effective a greenhouse gas is.
Mt. Pinatubo, when it erputed, allowed for a brief, and VERY LOCAL assessment of CO2's climate sensitivity. This in conjunction with COUNTLESS other methods of measuring the climate sensitivity of CO2 helped prove that the amount of temperature increase with a doubling of CO2 would be 2-4degC.
What this tells us is that we KNOW that increasing CO2 will increase the surface temperature and we know about HOW MUCH it will do so.
There's obviously a lot of technical detail but generally we know how CO2 works in the atmosphere and we know how big the effect might be.
2) Volcanoes per se do NOT produce nearly as much CO2 as humans do. This is why the 13-C/12-C isotope ratio is moving the way it is in the atmosphere. It is increasing the amount of the lighter isotope (12-C) which is exactly what one expects from the burning of fossil fuels which are depleted in 13-C (plants tend to fix lighter carbon).
Humans produce about 100X more CO2 than volcanoes.
SOURCE: https://skepticalscience.com/images/CO2_vs_Volcano.gif
Tobytone
Verified User
Umm, hello?? Obviously, the heat, floods, tornados, and anything that happens going forward are results of Trump slashing environmental spending and projects that would have dealt with all of this crazy weather we've had lately. AOC's 12 year counter is back on leaving us very little time. Trump owns this heat wave and we all know it.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
No, the REAL problem is that most people who claim to "believe the science" refuse to acknowledge that they've redefined their own religion into "science".
Science stands in the way of your "climate crisis" religion.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Another word for it is 'religion'. In their case, it's a religion that additionally outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
I don't believe you. You REJECT the science.
I don't believe you. You REJECT the science.
No, it doesn't. It REJECTS physics.
Yes, I do have my reasons for not believing your logic, science, and mathematics-rejecting wacky religion.
I've participated in this discussion many a time before... and no "global warming" advocate can seem to explain to me:
1: Where is the additional thermal energy coming from (that is required to increase Earth's temperature)? (assuming constant output from the sun)
2: How does redistributing Earth's thermal energy (from one part of Earth to another part of Earth) somehow ADD the ADDITIONAL thermal energy to Earth that is required to increase Earth's temperature?
3: How does one side of a math equation decrease in value while the other side increases in value? (decreased radiance of Earth, yet increased temperature of Earth, due to "trapped heat". This is a rejection of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law)
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The fact you are a science-denying MAGA sheeple is as unsurprising as your lying about being a Christian, Hater.
Industrialization has existed for almost two centuries with a rise industrialization along with the global population spiking over the past 100 years. It'll take about as long to correct. The fact you don't give a shit about the future of American kids is expected from a lying, self-centered POS like you.
The "Green New Deal" was a proposal, son, not US government policy.
Green New Deal - Wikipedia
Evidence - NASA Science
Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end of
science.nasa.gov
Evidence
There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.
Libhater
Verified User
The fact you are a science-denying MAGA sheeple is as unsurprising as your lying about being a Christian, Hater.
Industrialization has existed for almost two centuries with a rise industrialization along with the global population spiking over the past 100 years. It'll take about as long to correct. The fact you don't give a shit about the future of American kids is expected from a lying, self-centered POS like you.
The "Green New Deal" was a proposal, son, not US government policy.
Green New Deal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Evidence - NASA Science
Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end ofEvidence
There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.
Do yourself a favor there dunce by going back to view RB 60's #31 post that shows just how wrong and delirious those so called
scientists or climate experts were on their predictions of utter doomsday disasters for our nation and for the world. Note that these predictions were done around 50 years ago, and how many of them came to fruition? NONE, that's how many. Oh the world is going to end very
soon. LOL!!!!!!
MAGA
Verified User
That's three times posting the same crappy drawings of dicks. Though I think this was before my warning. However... I'm pretty sure you are not long for this site.
Last edited by a moderator:
Just a few...
So, when faced with what is literally mountains of actual science you think that a few "pop culture" references from the time make climate science not real?
How does this impact the KNOWN effects of greenhouse gases?
I understand now why you opted NOT to debate ME on the topic as I could muster actual science. Instead you go for your wheelhouse of stupid pornographic gifs.
Does it ever get to you that you can't debate the science yet you think you can have an opinion on it that anyone would care about?
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
The irony miss Terry for trump
"Pop culture"? What the hell do you mean by that? Those articles were from what was reputable magazines, papers and "experts."
We were all supposed to be dead by now if you listened to those "science experts" from the 60s. Why ain't we dead?
Last edited:
