Explaining the Alt-Right stand: Minimum Wage

Bigdog said:
No, it was Socialism. They finally had to invade other countries in order to pay for it.

Germany was the first modern welfare State. It instituted national healthcare in the 1880's under Kaiser rule.
Click to expand...

So, ultra-nationalism had nothing to do with it?

"The party grew out of smaller political groups with a nationalist orientation[b/] that formed in the last years of World War I. In 1918, a league called the Freien Arbeiterausschuss für einen guten Frieden (Free Workers' Committee for a good Peace)[23] was created in Bremen, Germany. On 7 March 1918, Anton Drexler, an avid German nationalist, formed a branch of this league in Munich.[23] Drexler was a local locksmith who had been a member of the militarist Fatherland Party[24] during World War I, and was bitterly opposed to the armistice of November 1918 and the revolutionary upheavals which followed. Drexler followed the typical views of militant nationalists of the day"
 
Free Workers' Committee for a good Peace
Click to expand...

What a perfect Socialist name. And a militant Drexler founded a branch.

Socialist Democrats are the warmongerers of the 20th century.
 
The vision of the Alt-right for the minimum wage is one set by each state, or better yet per county. Each county would be able to tell the necessary wage in their area for optimal growth with. One of the most prominent causes of divisions of the country is income inequality. State or countywide minimum wage combined with protectionist policies would encourage companies to outsource from the coast inland and from cities to rural areas as opposed to third world countries.
Click to expand...
Huh? That already sounds like the free market.

Anyways, even if there is gubmint imposed min. wage at any level of gubmint , the free market will eventually override gubmint IMO.
 
I will say this to anyone who asks and have said it before. Hitler was an evil person but also a great one. He took a country which was bankrupt, humiliated, disarmed, and had its best most productive industrial land annexed by France. Somehow he managed to take that country and almost beat the US, Britain, Russia, and China. At the same time.

If you consider some people in history to evil to learn from then you are missing half the lessons you can get from history.
 
tsuke said:
I will say this to anyone who asks and have said it before. Hitler was an evil person but also a great one. He took a country which was bankrupt, humiliated, disarmed, and had its best most productive industrial land annexed by France. Somehow he managed to take that country and almost beat the US, Britain, Russia, and China. At the same time.

If you consider some people in history to evil to learn from then you are missing half the lessons you can get from history.
Click to expand...

Germany didn't even come close to winning the war.
 
Guille said:
Germany didn't even come close to winning the war.
Click to expand...

There are numerous things which could have happened. If the alliance with russia held, if the US stayed out longer, If Russia collapsed faster, If spain which was already pro-nazi officially joined the Axis, If italians were not worthless fighters, any one of them could have led to victory.
 
Bigdog said:
No, it was Socialism. They finally had to invade other countries in order to pay for it.

Germany was the first modern welfare State. It instituted national healthcare in the 1880's under Kaiser rule.
Click to expand...
And, now every industrial nation in the world has national health care coverage except for the US, where health care costs more than anywhere.

So far, I don't see these nations attempting to conquer each other to pay for health care.

Do you?
 
tsuke said:
There are numerous things which could have happened. If the alliance with russia held, if the US stayed out longer, If Russia collapsed faster, If spain which was already pro-nazi officially joined the Axis, If italians were not worthless fighters, any one of them could have led to victory.
Click to expand...

Hitler is the one who broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
We were never really out of it to begin with.
Russia wasn't going to collapse, the Germans were actually very lucky they stopped short of Moscow because there were 40+ Soviet winter divisions waiting for them there.
Spain in the Axis would have resulted in a quicker Allied victory, the Axis did not want to defend that coastline.
The Italians....well, point taken.
 
Bigdog said:
I never ever heard of the Alt-right until the democrats invented it a couple of months ago. :dunno:
Click to expand...
Trump's chief advisor, Bannon, explicitly stated that under his leadership Breitbart would be the center of the alt-right.

I don't see any way to support the notion that Dems caused that.
 
Bigdog said:
I never ever heard of the Alt-right until the democrats invented it a couple of months ago. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Wrong. It was coined in 2010 by Richard Spencer. Research is fundamental.

White supremacist Richard Spencer coined the term in 2010 to define a movement centered on white nationalism, and has been accused of doing so to whitewash the negative American connotations against overt racism, white supremacy, and neo-Nazism.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP][SUP][5][/SUP] Spencer has repeatedly quoted from Nazi propaganda and spoken critically of the Jewish people,[SUP][5][/SUP][SUP][6][/SUP] although he has denied being a neo-Nazi; alt-right beliefs have been described as white supremacist,[SUP][7][/SUP][SUP][8][/SUP][SUP][9][/SUP] frequently overlapping with antisemitism and Neo-Nazism,[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][SUP][12][/SUP] nativism and Islamophobia,[SUP][13][/SUP][SUP][14][/SUP][SUP][15][/SUP][SUP][16][/SUP][SUP][17][/SUP] antifeminism and homophobia,[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][18][/SUP][SUP][19][/SUP][SUP][20][/SUP][SUP][21][/SUP] white nationalist, right-wing populism,[SUP][22][/SUP][SUP][23][/SUP] and the neoreactionary movement.[SUP][7][/SUP][SUP][24][/SUP] The concept has further been associated with multiple groups from American nationalists, neo-monarchists, men's rights advocates, and the 2016 campaign of Donald Trump.[SUP][13][/SUP][SUP][17][/SUP][SUP][21][/SUP][SUP][23][/SUP][SUP][24][/SUP][SUP][25][/SUP]
 
tsuke said:
I will say this to anyone who asks and have said it before. Hitler was an evil person but also a great one. He took a country which was bankrupt, humiliated, disarmed, and had its best most productive industrial land annexed by France. Somehow he managed to take that country and almost beat the US, Britain, Russia, and China. At the same time.

If you consider some people in history to evil to learn from then you are missing half the lessons you can get from history.
Click to expand...

Jeebus.

I suppose we should thank you for finally showing who you really are.
 
Yes. If you were really opposed to the right left paradigm, you would not accept the alt right label.


Fuck off shill.

The on l y moral stance is populism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top