Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Moron says what?
I don't know about what the morons like you say, BUT I SAY FUCK YOU!
Ex-Capital Police Chief Calls Jan 6 Official Story 'A Cover Up', Violence "End Goal"
- Thread starter traveler
- Start date
I don't know about what the morons like you say, BUT I SAY FUCK YOU!
If they have sufficient evidence then she should be charged. You don't excuse one person for committing a crime because some other person also did it and wasn't charged. Every case is different. You are seeking to excuse crimes by blaming others. I didn't defend anybody else of illegal activities.
I think he stated that the troops were stationed a mile away.
Again, you miss the point. The point was Nancy and the mayor been less concerned with optics and wanting the violence, this could have been avoided. According to the person who was in the thick of it.
Most were peaceful. However, when police started assaulting the mostly peaceful protestors with mace and clubs, it turned more violent.
If it was so violent, why did capitol police escort people into and around the building?
The trespass charge is very weak. If capitol police escorted people into the building, they were charged with trespass. See any problems with that?
The point of this thread, which you apparently are incapable of comprehending while looking like an MSNBC parrot, is that all this could have been avoided and that this may have been the intent and result Democrats wanted.
Care to debate the thread premise, or do you want to continue looking like a mindless MSNBXC parrot and beating that dead horse?
Trump was the one wanting the violence to show support for his cause and hopefully to block the election results.
You need to watch the video again. You have been listening to talk radio or Youtube. Police did not arrest the "mostly peaceful" demonstrators. The ones being "escorted" were not violent. If you listened to those officers at the hearings they were trying to steer the trespassers away from the members of Congress who were being threatened by angry thugs.
Such a repugnant little man. I bet your mom wishes she had an abortion.
WRONG again. Apparently comprehending the point is extremely difficult for you. The point made was that we don't criminalize political speech in order to jail our political appointments. They can be horribly repugnant like Democrats, but we don't jail them.
You miss the point. Nobody is criminalizing speech. When speech is a part of a criminal conspiracy that seeks to overturn votes and election results, it is the action and not the speech that is criminal.
More speculative bullshit. I don't think you can post without it.
Police didn't arrest many at all during the protest. Most of those arrests came long after the event with the swat teams and FBI banging on people's doors at home.
You obviously get your information from MSNBC and the DNC. You're not very smart. Shame.
What they are trying to do with Trump is absolutely criminalize speech. What is happening is beyond mere absurd but borders on lunacy. They are claiming that Trump incited a riot by not accepting the results of an election they claim was without flaw. That in itself is moronic.
Their case rests on proving they know what was in Trumps mind at the time. In other words, that he really didn't think he won. That is moronic.
Hell, I don't think the election was fair and have an entire thread devoted to why, nor do over 75 million other voters who feel they were disenfranchised by the actions of Democrats, jurists and local authorities. Link is below:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...was-no-fraud-The-election-was-perfect-SHUT-UP
Tinkerpeach
Member
Only Alabama and Arizona have national guard units designated as rapid response units.
While there were probably many national guardsman working in DC per their duty requirements they weren't equipped or ready to be there within an hour.
BidenPresident
Verified User
Simple fact: Only the Commander in Chief, the US President Trump, could have called the National Guard.
Tinkerpeach
Member
The point is that DC doesn't have a national guard rapid response unit meaning they would have to call up the people, equip them and then send them in.
That's not going to happen in an hour.
That's why Trump didn't bother ordering them in.
It was much quicker to get police units to respond to the scene.
Which they did.
BidenPresident
Verified User
False. Trump refused to call out the National Guard.
Tinkerpeach
Member
BidenPresident
Verified User
You know very little. And you lie about the rest.
Tinkerpeach
Member
I know everything.
Tinkerpeach
Member
If he did it would have pointless, by the time they would have arrived it was already over.
BidenPresident
Verified User
stop lying
Tinkerpeach
Member
You are an idiot.
Figure that once Trump gives the order headquarters starts calling up the hundreads of people they would need to quell the riot. They need to leave their homes or leave where they are coming from. It would take at least an hour to inform them all they were needed to respond.
It would take another hour, at a minimum for them to get to the base.
It would take another hour for them to equip and be briefed.
Another hour to transport them all to the location.
That is four hours.
The actual riot started at 1:45 pm, it was over by 3
m. Do the math.