PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Circularity, bitch. You "Christians" thrive on it. Depend on it.
![]()
most people would only bother using it on circular arguments.......you haven't quite grasped that concept yet.....
Circularity, bitch. You "Christians" thrive on it. Depend on it.
![]()
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
― Epicurus
We're all still waiting for your "proof", idiot. Got photos?
![]()
So it sounds like you have never taken a college level philosophy class despite mocking Mott about it, and I get the distinct impression you do not understand the history of science nor intellectual history and thought
Haven't met him......can you link me to his holy book?.....
most people would only bother using it on circular arguments.......you haven't quite grasped that concept yet.....
Epicurus was illogical.....so are you.....malevolent would not hesitate to create an automaton incapable of exercising free will......a benevolent deity would not deny his created the ability to exercise their own free will.......
Got photos of your hatred towards me?
It’s obvious, stupid fuck. Allahu akbar!
![]()
WHOOSH!
![]()
You don’t know “would have” from shit.
Epicurus kicks your ass.
![]()
Amusement is the word, moron.
Still waiting for your “proof” rather than your diversion.
Dolt.
![]()
Got photos of your amusement?
Pascal's wager.That is exactly the reply I would expect from someone who is in denial that there is a higher authority than man. Many things test us on our desire for something, why not the creator? All I can say is if I'm right you lose everything and I gain everything but if I'm wrong I lose nothing.
Pascal's wager.
Still waiting for that "proof" of yours, fool.
As usual, nada.
![]()
Pascal's wager.
And I'm waiting for yours. Take a photo of your amusement.
You weren't paying attention then. It is very possible to prove that something exists without physical evidence.
OK...and this has what to do with evolutionary theory?