Evidence of firearms in Jan. 6 crowd grows as arrests and trials mount

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
Some of the startling revelations of the recent blockbuster Jan. 6 House committee hearing came in snippets of police radio traffic captured during President Donald Trump’s rally on the Ellipse and from Trump’s purported response to being told there were armed protesters just outside a secured area.

The chatter included reports of a man with an AR-15 in a tree on Constitution Avenue who was accompanied by two men with pistols on their hips. Another officer radioed, “I’ve got three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s, copy, at 14th and Independence.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/08/jan6-defendants-guns/
 
BidenPresident said:
Some of the startling revelations of the recent blockbuster Jan. 6 House committee hearing came in snippets of police radio traffic captured during President Donald Trump’s rally on the Ellipse and from Trump’s purported response to being told there were armed protesters just outside a secured area.

The chatter included reports of a man with an AR-15 in a tree on Constitution Avenue who was accompanied by two men with pistols on their hips. Another officer radioed, “I’ve got three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s, copy, at 14th and Independence.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/08/jan6-defendants-guns/
Click to expand...

I'm sure all the feds were carrying firearms.
 
Where are the arrests and illegal firearms?

STUPIDFUCK. More "GOSSIP" presented as 'evidence"....of what?
 
BidenPresident said:
You are extremely stupid.
Click to expand...


Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself. It is another informal logical fallacy.

The logical structure of an ad hominem is as follows:

Person A makes a claim X.
Person B attacks person A.
Therefore, X is wrong.

When you see the logical structure of the argument it becomes clear why it’s a fallacy. The truth or falsehood of X has nothing to do with the person arguing in support of it. Imagine if X had been written down and you didn’t know who was arguing the case. If you couldn’t prove it wrong with arguments, then you can’t prove it wrong at all.






IOW, YOU LOSE AGAIN ,LITTLE BITCH.
 
Grokmaster said:
Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself. It is another informal logical fallacy.

The logical structure of an ad hominem is as follows:

Person A makes a claim X.
Person B attacks person A.
Therefore, X is wrong.

When you see the logical structure of the argument it becomes clear why it’s a fallacy. The truth or falsehood of X has nothing to do with the person arguing in support of it. Imagine if X had been written down and you didn’t know who was arguing the case. If you couldn’t prove it wrong with arguments, then you can’t prove it wrong at all.






IOW, YOU LOSE AGAIN ,LITTLE BITCH.
Click to expand...

shut up you stupid asshole
 
BidenPresident said:
shut up you stupid asshole
Click to expand...


Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself. It is another informal logical fallacy.

The logical structure of an ad hominem is as follows:

Person A makes a claim X.
Person B attacks person A.
Therefore, X is wrong.

When you see the logical structure of the argument it becomes clear why it’s a fallacy. The truth or falsehood of X has nothing to do with the person arguing in support of it. Imagine if X had been written down and you didn’t know who was arguing the case. If you couldn’t prove it wrong with arguments, then you can’t prove it wrong at all.




Still NO PROOF OF THE OP CLAIMS?

IOW, YOU LOSE AGAIN ,LITTLE BITCH.

 
1657388446473-png.1033156
 
Grokmaster said:
Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself. It is another informal logical fallacy.

The logical structure of an ad hominem is as follows:

Person A makes a claim X.
Person B attacks person A.
Therefore, X is wrong.

When you see the logical structure of the argument it becomes clear why it’s a fallacy. The truth or falsehood of X has nothing to do with the person arguing in support of it. Imagine if X had been written down and you didn’t know who was arguing the case. If you couldn’t prove it wrong with arguments, then you can’t prove it wrong at all.




Still NO PROOF OF THE OP CLAIMS?

IOW, YOU LOSE AGAIN ,LITTLE BITCH.
Click to expand...

There is documented evidence that weapons were brought to the Capital!! Need proof, handjob?
 
BidenPresident said:
Yes, exactly. Trump told them to allow the armed people in past the metal detectors. Expect to see this testimony on Tuesday.
Click to expand...

THEY WERE OUTSIDE THE CAPITIOL AREA, IDIOTGIRL. WHO IS GOING TO TESTIFY ABOUT THESE UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS?


TRUMP, AT NO TIME, ORDERED THE DC POLICE TO DO OR NTO DO ANYTHING...THEY ARE NOT UNDER HIS AUTHORITY, YOU FLAMING DUMBASS.


ONCE AGAIN, WHY DIDN'T THE DC POLICE APPREHEND THEM?


MAYBE BECAUSE THEY WERE FBI PLANTS?
 
Grokmaster said:
THEY WERE OUTSIDE THE CAPITIOL AREA, IDIOTGIRL. WHO IS GOING TO TESTIFY ABOUT THESE UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS?


TRUMP, AT NO TIME, ORDERED THE DC POLICE TO DO OR NTO DO ANYTHING...THEY ARE NOT UNDER HIS AUTHORITY, YOU FLAMING DUMBASS.


ONCE AGAIN, WHY DIDN'T THE DC POLICE APPREHEND THEM?


MAYBE BECAUSE THEY WERE FBI PLANTS?
Click to expand...

I am not a girl, you embarrassment to human consciousness.
 
BidenPresident said:
I am not a girl, you embarrassment to human consciousness.
Click to expand...

YOU ARE ALSO NOT WORTH A SHIT AT DISCERNING FACTS.


THE PRESIDENT HAD NO CONTROL OVER THE DC POLICE.


WHY DIDN'T THEY APPREHEND THE "THREE GUYS WITH GUNS" , THEY SUDDENLY SEEM TO REMEMBER?


WHO ORDERED THEM NOT TO?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top