Even without removal... I got what I was hoping for.

The Impeachment process only started late in November- NOT SINCE DAY ONE IDIOT!

Hey FuckTard; the statement was that they have been WANTING to impeach since day one. You really are an epic idiot. :rolleyes:

Exactly how did the Democrats try to unseat this goofy president before NOVEMBER 2019?! Huh IDIOT?

When are you going to grow a fucking brain. You mental midget. :rolleyes:
 
But if he does win, the bar will be lowered for years to come. That's why this election is so important. Shitty presidents will come and go, but the normalization of cheating in elections will be with us for a long time.

Trump will win re-election. The Republicans might even win back the House. One cannot imagine the lunacy leftists will erupt with then.
 
Trump is IMPOTUS, it has a real nice ring to it.

It's patently stupid; but then, you're an idiot so there is that. :rolleyes:

Meanwhile, Trump has the economy booming, unemployment down to 50 plus year lows, stock market hitting record highs and seating a record number of judges and Justices.

What are you getting from your side; "BUT TRUMP!" That spells L O S E R. :rolleyes:
 
Hello Darth,



The President's actions were an abuse of power which should not be allowed to stand as a precedent.

I guarantee you that the Republicans in 10 years would absolutely want to impeach a President Ocasio-Cortez if she withheld aid to Israel in order to get them to announce an investigation into Presidential candidate Matt Gaetz.

Speaking of precedents, I doubt seriously it will take a decade before the next impeachment happens.

All they need is a straight party line vote in the House now. Don’t be surprised when the next Republican controlled House goes after the next Democrat President under ‘abuse of power’.

Then remember that you cheered for it.
 
Okay, I missed that "minority" aspect. Sorry.

But whether from the standpoint of a minority citizen or someone who simply sees Trump as the existential menace he is to our Republic and the world...

...the operative phrase in my comments is "the Senate is NOT going to convict him."

They happen to have control in that chamber...and they are NOT going to convict Trump.

Don't see how, the dumb cluck only ever talks about race.
 
Looks like Jared was looking for a humiliating defeat in the Senate and a sure five more years for President Trump.

Go figure.
 
I didn't. I got an impeachment and the knowledge that 30 percent of the population who have most of the senate by the balls are traitors
covering for a criminal who is pretending to be president.
.

ironically, we have the same knowledge, but think the 30% who are traitors are the demmycunts........
 
the bolded is part of y'alls TDS issues..................you can't fathom that there can be someone out there who isn't totally bashing trump still not being a trump supporter........like i said before........two dimensional mindset

Edmund Burke wrote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

ANYONE not actively opposing Trump right now...is like ANYONE who was not actively opposing Adolph Hitler back in the mid-1930's.

If YOU are not opposing him...and opposing him with gusto, YOU are a Trump supporter.

Sounds as though that bothers you.

Good. That is why I am calling it to your attention.
 
Last edited:
Edmund Burke wrote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

ANYONE not actively opposing Trump right now...is like ANYONE who was not actively opposing Adolph Hitler back in the mid-1030's.

If YOU are not opposing him...and opposing him with gusto, YOU are a Trump supporter.

Sounds as though that bothers you.

Good. That is why I am calling it to your attention.

that's your story and your sticking to it?

:rofl2:
 
Edmund Burke wrote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

ANYONE not actively opposing Trump right now...is like ANYONE who was not actively opposing Adolph Hitler back in the mid-1030's.

If YOU are not opposing him...and opposing him with gusto, YOU are a Trump supporter.

Sounds as though that bothers you.

Good. That is why I am calling it to your attention.

Horse mierda.

When you make a false moral equivalency between President Trump and Hitler, you have already lost the debate.

Peals of derisive laughter follow you as you are escorted off the debate stage.
 
Hello Darth,

Speaking of precedents, I doubt seriously it will take a decade before the next impeachment happens.

All they need is a straight party line vote in the House now. Don’t be surprised when the next Republican controlled House goes after the next Democrat President under ‘abuse of power’.

Then remember that you cheered for it.

If that Democratic President was abusing power as flagrantly as Donald Trump is then I would welcome it.

If there was as much evidence as now exists against Donald Trump it would be their Constitutional duty to do so.

Especially if that Democratic President completely refused to cooperate with the House investigation and withheld evidence as a part of a big cover up.

I WOULD WELCOME IT AND CHEER IT ON.

I would strongly disapprove if the House did nothing and let the abuse continue.

Above all, we have to be true to ourselves.

We cannot pretend that someone we may have favored as a candidate might turn into someone we disapprove of as a President.

The last thing I would want to do would be to believe in BS that just wasn't true.

Without the truth, we have nothing.

And that is why we must hear all the evidence in this impeachment trial.

Refusing to see something in no way means it is not there.

And there is no way I could support a side that ignores facts and argues they should not be seen.

I could not approve of or believe in such shame.
 
Flame out on aisle 7, film (video) at 11.

Some on the far left have no self-control or self-discipline.

Imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth when President Trump is found innocent and reelected in Nov.
 
Back
Top