Even DHS admits Venezuela is sending its CONVICTS to america!!

You should know by now attacking the source means absolutely NOTHING. It is a dodge to avoid actual rebuttal and discussion. But when you are one the radical Left like Trumpet, you really don't have anything else to use...

You really don't know Breitbart? You might as well source the Onion.
 
I think every, illegal immigrant should just be immediately, taken back from where they came.


However, I swear to God that if - for every, illegal alien that entered America?

One, white supremacist (like TDAK) would leave?

I would take that deal in a millisecond.


I am not saying that to troll.
Or insult anyone.
I sincerely, believe it.

How will they be taken back?
 
Radical Leftwing sources like MSNBC or The Young Turks, are universally known to be bullshit propaganda sources. So? I don't attack them for being such, but rather address what they said / say. I guess you are just too ill-educated, incompetent, and incapable of doing likewise to prove this article is wrong or lying. It is you and the other radical Leftist Minions of Ignorance that trot out this logical fallacy whenever someone uses a source you disagree with.

"Oh, that's FOX! They're just liars!"
"Breitbart is just propaganda..."

If you don't like the source, you never try to refute it in any way. You try instead to dismiss it on the basis that it's that source.

:palm:
 
You have never heard of something called 'boats/ships'?
Depending on the number that are held/apprehended.
And their home location.

And who do you think will pay?
The tooth fairy?
US taxpayers obviously.

What is your point?

Okay. So who will be willing to pay for their trips on boats? I don't want my tax money going to that.
 
Okay. So who will be willing to pay for their trips on boats? I don't want my tax money going to that.

I guarantee you there are dozens of government programs that EVERY taxpayer - including me - does not agree with.
Little/nothing they/I can do about it.


But whatever the cost?
I guarantee you it would pale in comparison to the tax dollars that go to support, illegal immigrants remaining in America.

https://www.ajmc.com/view/2-billion-medicaid-program-helps-mostly-illegal-immigrants-
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-cost...on-migrants-cost-us-taxpayers-billions-a-year

Even if you flew 4 million, illegal immigrants from - say - Dallas to Bogota, Columbia (for example) by passenger airliner?
https://www.kayak.com/flights/DFW-BOG/2022-10-19?sort=bestflight_a
At roughly $400 per person.
That is $1,600 million per year for FOUR MILLION people flown home.

Still, far less than the government spends JUST in medical benefits for illegal immigrants...alone.

It would save taxpayers, HUGE amounts of money to ship all illegal immigrants, back home.
 
Last edited:
Well, that's (theoretically) too bad.

I guarantee you there are dozens of government programs that EVERY taxpayer - including me - does not agree with.

Little/nothing they/I can do about it.

So you agree to spending millions if not billions of dollars spent on their trips (including food, lodging and such) to where they came from? Good to know.
 
So you agree to spending millions if not billions of dollars spent on their trips (including food, lodging and such) to where they came from? Good to know.

What big food/lodging/such costs?
You find an illegal immigrant?
If they have to be held for a couple days?
You hold them in a jail/police holding sell.
These ARE illegal immigrants, after all.
Not Medal Of Honor recipients.
You then put them on the first, commercial flight, back to where they came from.

Whatever the cost?
I guarantee you it would pale in comparison to the tax dollars that go to support, illegal immigrants remaining in America.

https://www.ajmc.com/view/2-billion-...al-immigrants-
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-cost-...illions-a-year

Even if you flew 4 million, illegal immigrants from - say - Dallas to Bogota, Columbia (for example) by commercial flight?
https://www.kayak.com/flights/DFW-BO...t=bestflight_a
At roughly $400 per person.
That is $1,600 million per year for FOUR MILLION people flown home.

Still, far less than the government spends JUST in medical benefits for illegal immigrants...alone.

It would save taxpayers, HUGE amounts of money to ship all illegal immigrants, back home.
 
Last edited:
What food/lodging/such?
You find an illegal immigrant?
You immediately put them on the first, commercial flight, back to where they came from.

Whatever the cost?
I guarantee you it would pale in comparison to the tax dollars that go to support, illegal immigrants remaining in America.

https://www.ajmc.com/view/2-billion-...al-immigrants-
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-cost-...illions-a-year

Even if you flew 4 million, illegal immigrants from - say - Dallas to Bogota, Columbia (for example) by passenger airliner?
https://www.kayak.com/flights/DFW-BO...t=bestflight_a
At roughly $400 per person.
That is $1,600 million per year for FOUR MILLION people flown home.

Still, far less than the government spends JUST in medical benefits for illegal immigrants...alone.

It would save taxpayers, HUGE amounts of money to ship all illegal immigrants, back home.

I'll bite your bait. How are our government supporting the illegals?
 
Sorry.

Must be since I copy and pasted them from my earlier post.

Try them at the following post:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-CONVICTS-to-america!!&p=5290498#post5290498

But while federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid, a little-known part of the state-federal health insurance program for the poor pays about $2 billion a year for emergency treatment for a group of patients who, according to hospitals, mostly comprise illegal immigrants. Most of it goes to reimburse hospitals for delivering babies for women who show up in their emergency rooms, according to interviews with hospital officials and studies.

So no direct benefits to illegals.

I suggest reading this: https://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/cost-of-illegal-immigrants/

I am surprised at you, to be honest. You're better than that. You have been lied to.
 
Breitbart likewise. You are just making a red herring fallacy using appeal to deprivation.

Don't be like Into The Night. Throwing fallacies around does not contribute to discussion.

So you now agree that Breitbart shouldn't be used as a legitimate source? I accept AP, Reuters and BBC. If Fox News is being used as a source, I will read it but I have to be careful as they are known to distort stories.
 
Back
Top