As you've been told, Paul did not know Jesus - he was a Roman citizen, making up a new religion under Jesus' name. The discussion is about what Jesus said.
Paul was an apostle of God!
As you've been told, Paul did not know Jesus - he was a Roman citizen, making up a new religion under Jesus' name. The discussion is about what Jesus said.
Paul was an apostle of God!
First, you made claims about what Jesus supposedly said, not what Paul supposedly wrote.Jesus is God, the scriptures are inspired by God, the Apostle Paul confirmed in his teaching that Homosexuality was a sin. Do you believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God or do you not?
He was not Jesus, surely, even in your brainwashed 'mind'? We were discussing what Jesus said.
First, you made claims about what Jesus supposedly said, not what Paul supposedly wrote.
Paul was writing letters to colleagues in Christian communities in Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy.
He did not know he was supposedly writing scripture. Men living 200 years after Paul decided to retroactively declare his letters revealed scripture.
The overwhelming consensus among religious scholars is that only seven of the Pauline epistles were genuinely written by Paul. The rest are pseudonymous by unknown authors claiming to be Paul.
Furthermore, you have never actually read Paul's letters. You are reading modern English translations. Paul did not speak or write English, a language which did not even exist in the first century.
Paul was a Hellenistic Jew who wrote in ancient Greek. Translations from a two thousand year old language into modern vernacular necessarily requires subjective interpretation of meaning and intent. Since neither you nor I read ancient Greek we are not in a position to categorically claim what Paul's goal and intent were.
Do you believe the Bible was inspired by God or not? Jesus is God
I believe that if we are discussing what Jesus said, we are discussing words recorded as spoken by the historical Jesus. Otherwise there is no serious discussion - just an amorphous mess.
Do you believe the Bible was inspired by God or not? Jesus is God
So you said. Shall we both just go on repeating ourselves forever? I can't see the point. Whatever other beliefs you may hold, what we are discussing is a figure in history, Jesus of Nazareth.
you originally did not mention Paul at all. Your laser like focus is on what you claim Jesus said.Your ignorance knows no bounds, whatever is in the Bible, whomever said it it was inspired by God! The words in Red were Jesus, therefore God was speaking directly!
Who was also God incarnate, you either believe that or you don't!
you originally did not mention Paul at all. Your laser like focus is on what you claim Jesus said.
I accept your tacit confession that Jewish law in Leviticus does not necessarily apply to gentiles. Paul's entire mission was to base the church on the premise that Jewish law in Torah should not be a requirement of gentiles.
Paul did not think anyone ideally should be having sex or seeking romantic partners, because as an apocalypticist he thought the second coming of Christ was imminet and the faithful needed to focus on righteousness, asceticism, and piety in preparation for the Kingdom of God
If you can't distinguish the historical Jesus from your theological notions, you aren't worth talking too, I'm afraid. Goodbye.
I'd be glad to help you out, then.I' always baffled by this sort of discussion.
They aren't. A number of Christians (such as myself), however, are against the perversion of marriage (to the point where the institution becomes completely irrelevant).Why should Christians be against anyone getting married who wants to?
Matthew 19:4-6 is quite clear on how Jesus views marriage (red highlights are mine).Where did Jesus say otherwise?
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
And that claim is correct. Matthew 19:4-6 is very clear.The claim is Jesus said marriage is between a man and a women,
LIE. He was one of Jesus' disciples. He knew Jesus quite well.written by a guy who did not know Jesus
Irrelevant.and wrote it decades after the time Jesus lived.
It is being honest, anyway.“sure it is, disney has lost all respect anyway.... run by a bunch of liberal fag loving pussies”
And this is your idea of being mature?
Matthew 19:4-6 ... maybe YOU should read the New Testament sometime...Where is he recorded as being against homosexuality?
Christians use BOTH Testaments, actually.Christians tend to use the New Testament, kid.
See above.You should read it some time.
See Matthew 19:4-6 ... Jesus was very clear on what marriage is (between a man and a woman), and was very clear about how deviations away from that are sinful. He is also very clear about recognizing the Old Testament as the Word of God, regularly quoting from it.I do not think Jesus himself is reported to have spoken about her homosexuality as a sin.
And that claim is correct. Matthew 19:4-6 is very clear.
LIE. He was one of Jesus' disciples. He knew Jesus quite well.
Irrelevant.