Evangelicals fume as GOP surrenders in gay marriage wars

Back in those days the American people had a say in who could or couldn't get married. The courts took away our voices, and since then the drums began beating for government recognition of polygamy and incest.

What argument is there against them now? Immoral won't work. You said so yourself.

Good work 👍

How pissed are you that they have also backed down on women in the workplace?
 
No, but apparently you do. The word 'possible' is not a synonym for 'required', and you act as if I never said the words 'in principle'.

Ah so you are being anal. Okay.

Let's work on your logic and English.

1. Same sex relations are not marriages.
2. The reason is the possibility of creating children is nonexistent in gay relationships
3. Non possibility means zero percent chance.
4. Therefore, in order for it to be a real marriage, the possibility of procreation must be required.
 
Biden will roll the fuck over on that. And right now he is bombing the fuck out of Somalia. This whole bullshit about Biden getting us out of conflicts is just that. Bullshit.

The US stock market has always been a good barometer to determine if a global situation is good for America or not. All the Presidents use it.
Same for Congress. :flagsal:
 
Ah so you are being anal. Okay.
I am being precise.

Let's work on your logic and English.
It is your logic and English that needs work. You got Liberal down pretty good though.

1. Same sex relations are not marriages.
Correct. Marriage can only occur between a man and a woman.

2. The reason is the possibility of creating children is nonexistent in gay relationships
Procreation is impossible via "gay sex". It is even impossible in principle, which is what is at the heart of the matter.

3. Non possibility means zero percent chance.
Correct. The unfruitful perversion of "gay sex", even in principle, cannot yield a child.

4. Therefore, in order for it to be a real marriage, the possibility of procreation must be required.
Not quite.

The possibility of procreation in principle is required. This distinction is vital to my position, and not including it leads into a complete bastardization of my position. I'll reword it for you:


1. Same sex relations are not marriages.

2. The reason for this is because procreation, even in principle, is impossible via "gay sex". IOW, "gay sex" is unfruitful.

3. Impossible means a zero percent chance.

4. Therefore, in order for a marriage to exist, the possibility of procreation in principle must also exist.
 
It is your logic and English that needs work. You got Liberal down pretty good though.

Nope. You got Conservative down pretty good.

Correct. Marriage can only occur between a man and a woman.

Assertion #1.

Procreation is impossible via "gay sex".

Correct.

It is even impossible in principle, which is what is at the heart of the matter.

No it is not at the heart of the matter.

Correct. The unfruitful perversion of "gay sex", even in principle, cannot yield a child.

Correct.

The possibility of procreation in principle is required.

Required for what?

1. Same sex relations are not marriages.

2. The reason for this is because procreation, even in principle, is impossible via "gay sex". IOW, "gay sex" is unfruitful.

3. Impossible means a zero percent chance.

4. Therefore, in order for a marriage to exist, the possibility of procreation in principle must also exist.

In other words: The ability to procreate is required for the marriage to be legit.
 
After we found out Bin Laden was not in Afghanistan we should have been the hell out. The Soviet Union learned that long before us. Bush got us there, no doubt about that. Every President since him kept us there. After all this time one would think any politician would have listened to their military advisors as to the best way to accomplish the pull out.

Agreed. It's always the politicians who want to be the first to go in and, often, the first to leave, but this war was past American interests ten years ago.
 
There is no "gay gene".

Correct, Sybil. So why is Into the Night gay? Or straight? Did you chose to be straight, Sybil? Did you ponder the merits of eating pussy versus sucking cock?

I always had a preference for eating pussing....and motorboating, of course, with no interest in hairy asses...except Greek chicks...or cocks. You?
 
Then what causes homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
Sexuality is wired deeply into our structure.

What you do you call a program that spreads through all major functions of a system but has no actual "home base" or center itself? Some buried deep into the code.

If it was just programming putting Tab A into Slot B, that's pretty basic, but there's a lot into selecting mates, hence why it's spread across a lot of the human psyche. What attracts you? What do you love? (two different things) Vice versa.

In the animal kingdom, it varies by species. Homo penguins are probably looking for protection and companionship. Dogs will fuck anything but mostly straight.

Regardless of what many women say about men, we're not all dogs and not our place to say who can fuck whom.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...teal-lesbian-couple-s-eggs-dutch-zoo-n1244575
Gay male penguins steal lesbian couple's eggs at Dutch Zoo
The gay male African penguins, who made headlines last year when they stole an egg from a heterosexual couple, have now stolen a lesbian duo’s nest.



Dutch zoo? WTF??
 
Looks like someone in the RNC made the calculation that there are more LGBTQ ppl and allies than there are anti-SSM/rights ppl in the evangelical contingent. They also saw the writing on the wall as far as their base's demographics go.

The Log Cabin Republican Party has millions of members.

Chapters

Since 1977, LCR has expanded across the United States and has 35 chapters, representing 26 states and the District of Columbia:

Arizona Log Cabin Republicans
Arkansas Log Cabin Republicans
California Log Cabin Republicans
Los Angeles Log Cabin Republicans
Marin County Log Cabin Republicans
Orange County Log Cabin Republicans
Palm Springs Log Cabin Republicans
Sacramento Log Cabin Republicans
San Diego Log Cabin Republicans
San Francisco Log Cabin Republicans
Sequoias Log Cabin Republicans
Silicon Valley Log Cabin Republicans
UCB / Alameda County Log Cabin Republicans
Ventura County Log Cabin Republicans
Colorado Log Cabin Republicans
Delaware Log Cabin Republicans
District of Columbia Log Cabin Republicans
Florida Log Cabin Republicans
Broward Log Cabin Republicans
Miami Log Cabin Republicans
Northeast / Jacksonville Log Cabin Republicans
Tampa Bay Log Cabin Republicans
Central / Orlando Log Cabin Republicans
Georgia Log Cabin Republicans
Illinois Log Cabin Republicans
Iowa Log Cabin Republicans
Louisiana Log Cabin Republicans
Maryland Log Cabin Republicans
Massachusetts Log Cabin Republicans
Michigan Log Cabin Republicans
Minnesota Log Cabin Republicans
Nevada Log Cabin Republicans
New Hampshire Log Cabin Republicans
New York Log Cabin Republicans
Hudson Valley Log Cabin Republicans
New York City Log Cabin Republicans
North Carolina Log Cabin Republicans
Ohio Log Cabin Republicans
Cleveland Log Cabin Republicans
Northeast Ohio Log Cabin Republicans
Oklahoma Log Cabin Republicans
Oregon Log Cabin Republicans
Pennsylvania Log Cabin Republicans
Rhode Island Log Cabin Republicans
South Carolina Log Cabin Republicans
Texas Log Cabin Republicans
Austin Log Cabin Republicans
Dallas Log Cabin Republicans
Houston Log Cabin Republicans
San Antonio Log Cabin Republicans
Utah Log Cabin Republicans
Virginia Log Cabin Republicans
Northern Virginia Log Cabin Republicans
Richmond Log Cabin Republicans
Washington Log Cabin Republicans
Wisconsin Log Cabin Republicans
 
Back
Top