Evander Holyfield says homosexuality not normally.

So... Nobody wants to talk about the topic any longer? .

Apparently you don't want to talk about it trying to compare homosexual behavior to doctors and flying. There's nothing that could be mistaken as logical or intelligent by such dimwitted arguments.
 
What comment?


I'm so sure you don't know...:rofl2:


images



Oh, HELL no.

Then you can prove it?
 
More of that great respect for women that you are always crowing about possessing I see! Good for you Tommy. Free you inner misogynist. Let him out! Your really soaring today. Many of your comments have been positive statements about women, that "Dumbest 'Girl' in The World" was a misogynistic classic. How old does a woman have to be Tommy, before she ceases to be a "girl" to you?

The fem nazis are hav a meltdown. Funny.
 
Apparently you don't want to talk about it trying to compare homosexual behavior to doctors and flying. There's nothing that could be mistaken as logical or intelligent by such dimwitted arguments.

So you have no reasoned argument how "normal" could set the standard for exclusion then. Got it. This is a child's argument to begin with. It isn't normal for me to treat childlike simplicity with respect, such as asking for your logical reasoning.

Let's go into something sexually not "normal" but for which you wouldn't exclude people from participation in society. Some people have a balloon fetish, they get sexually excited by popping balloons, this isn't "normal" behavior yet also not behavior that would prompt you to exclude them from society. Tell me what is the reason that one "not normal" behavior is more important than the other.
 
Who is this person, what does the heading - or this posting come to that - mean, and what exactly does it have to do with his geographical location when he (?) said it was not normally .... whatever?

If you don't know who Evander Holyfield then use Google!! If you watched Celebrity Big Tits Brother you wouid know.
 
I'm so sure you don't know...:rofl2:





Jeebus, that's ten years ago, no wonder it wasn't familiar.


Then you can prove it?

Already done.

Btw:

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by christiefan915

"Jungle fever" ... When a non-black person is atracted (sic)* sexually to black people. Originally it was used for when a white woman dates black men, but now it could refer to a white man who thinks black women are hot and wants to date them. Why not interracial relationship? Why not simply "relationship" or "marriage"?

* http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jungle fever
 
I'm so sure you don't know...:rofl2:


images





Then you can prove it?


a harmless joke when Hillary says it....a mortal racist sin if it was Romney or any Conservative.

How about....

“White folks was in caves while we was building empires… We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
- Rev. Al Sharpton

Did this bring out any liberal rage ?
 
Behavior doesn't have to be normal, that's silliness. There are all sorts of not "normal" things that people take for granted.

It isn't normal that somebody becomes a doctor, they are a smaller portion of our population than even homosexuals. It isn't normal that somebody owns a yacht, that too is a smaller portion of our population than homosexuals. It isn't normal to be a NASCAR race car driver, still a smaller number of our population than homosexuals. Fewer people run shrimp boats than are gay, that isn't "normal" either.

Tell me again how "normal" matters... make it make sense, please.

We fly on airplanes that is not normal.
 
a harmless joke when Hillary says it....a mortal racist sin if it was Romney or any Conservative.

How about....

“White folks was in caves while we was building empires… We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
- Rev. Al Sharpton

Did this bring out any liberal rage ?

Was it a recent quote, I am sure it would now, when did Al state this?
 
Are all sexual behaviors equal, and therefore must be equally tolerated, protected, even celebrated?
It would depend on victimization. Does your behavior affect the rights of others? Such behavior as affects the rights of others and creates victims should not be tolerated. All behavior that does not intrude on your rights and does not create a victim should at the very least be tolerated, if not celebrated.

The question you refuse to answer is the logical reason that such abnormal behavior should exclude people from participation in certain selected, by you, portions of society. If you cannot tell me the reason that it matters, as I have directly and simply asked, then you have a childlike simplicity of reasoning. You don't like what somebody else does regardless of its actual affect on you, therefore you need to ensure that nobody that is different from your standard of "icky" can ever participate in society as you do. They are "different" and therefore must be punished.

You notice that some abnormalities are simply accepted, that is because you don't find it "icky". Once it enters "icky" though, it becomes a hurdle and you suddenly care whether other people are "normal" and wish to punish them for what they like but you find "icky".
 
It would depend on victimization. Does your behavior affect the rights of others? Such behavior as affects the rights of others and creates victims should not be tolerated. All behavior that does not intrude on your rights and does not create a victim should at the very least be tolerated, if not celebrated.

The question you refuse to answer is the logical reason that such abnormal behavior should exclude people from participation in certain selected, by you, portions of society. If you cannot tell me the reason that it matters, as I have directly and simply asked, then you have a childlike simplicity of reasoning. You don't like what somebody else does regardless of its actual affect on you, therefore you need to ensure that nobody can ever participate in society as you do. They are "different" and therefore must be punished.

I don't know how to thank you on JPP mobile, haven't learned all the buttons, yet!
 
So where a sexual behavior is illegal, it must not and should not be accepted, tolerated, protected, or celebrated?

You're not going to trap me here, try as you may. :nono:

If "illegal" is defined by some ancient statute such as an anti-miscegenation law then you criticize the law first, not the behaviour it's prohibiting. And no one has to celebrate what they don't approve of, they just need to mind their own business.

People may think homosexuality, interracial relationships etc. are disgusting but that's simply not the same as real crimes like pedophilia or human trafficking.
 
Back
Top