The Netherlands leads the world in Socialist parasites. There is no better example of Socialist morality at work than those in Holland. The Dutch rejected Nazi euthanasia, but now Dutch Communists lead the world in peacetime euthanasia. The Netherlands has long been the proving ground for worldwide Socialism’s Culture of Death. As I said many times “Nazi Germany’s occupation was the last good thing to happen in the Netherlands.” Sad to say Holland’s morality is camping on our border:
The phrase “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” is often attributed to Associate Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892 - 1954), yet liberals are hellbent on bringing about America’s self-destruction. (Jackson took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court in order to act as the CHIEF PROSECUTOR in the best-known of the International Military Tribunals held in Nuremberg.)
There is nothing immoral in punishing those responsible for war crimes, but I always thought that they should be tried and punished by the victims in the country where the crimes took place —— not by an international body of any kind.
Socialist intellectuals have been working overtime establishing International law since the second half of the 19[SUP]th[/SUP] century. The 1961 movie Justice at Nuremberg was the first major propaganda attempt to sell it to the masses. J-at-N was shown on television’s Playhouse 90 before it was made into a theatrical movie. After listening to the dialogue it is hard to miss liberalism’s moral garbage.
The movie’s attack on love of country is even more offensive than is glorifying non-existent International law. That is not to say I put in with the kind of patriotism the Nazis practiced. The not-so-subliminal message that I object to is that patriotism itself was portrayed as the villain; Nazi judges went along out of their love for Germany.
Hitler came to power on false patriotism (nationalism). Obama came to power by paying scant lip service to his love of this country. Frankly, he did not need patriotism as a stepping stone to the White House. Had he needed it he would have used it. Luckily for Obama, and with a lot of help from the media, he avoided a patriotism pissing contest with his opponent John McCain.
Institutional sadism first preaches, then implements, the horrors that should be understood. Infanticide, euthanasia, population controls, death panels, forced sterilization, and doctor-assisted suicides, represent the very essence of institutional brutality. Every progressive ideal has been gaining acceptance while wearing a cloak of compassion.
NOTE: Islam added female mutilation to the list of institutional brutality in non-Muslim countries.
Incidentally, the high cost of keeping a comatose patient on life support is one of the arguments used to end life. The very people who make that argument never complain about the tremendous cost of feeding wealthy tax dollar parasites. In short: The number of individuals requiring life support is miniscule compared to the number of millionaire Democrat parasites in the federal government.
I noticed that the euthanasia lobby —— which includes the mainstream media —— list brain dead as a success. See this thread for more about brain dead:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-amp-Two-Evil-Non-Laws&p=2776904#post2776904
This is one aspect of brain dead that especially troubles me. There is an assumption that thoughts, emotions, feelings, etc., originate in the brain. Hence, brain dead sounds logical. I have never been convinced that that is the case. When you cut your finger an impulse is sent to the brain telling you to feel the pain in your finger. The paralyzing fear a person feels as their car skids towards an oncoming truck begins in the pit of their stomach, it does not originate in the brain.
Who can deny that thoughts are only processed by the brain originating elsewhere as in pain or fear? The brain is a processor and does not feel pain. As far as I know, there was no damage elsewhere sending signals to Terri’s brain telling her to feel pain. There was no evidence that she was feeling pain. Even if it can be shown beyond a doubt that she was in pain the answer is painkillers not euthanasia.
Those who killed Terri said that she was not in pain —— never admitting that starvation causes pain even if the brain was not functioning well enough to activate a defense mechanism.
Please do not compare the court-ordered murder of an innocent woman to the execution of a criminal after decades of tax dollar funded appeals. In any event, Terri Schiavo never hurt anyone, but she was killed without her consent anyway.
One of the arguments for killing Terri cited her Right to abstain from receiving artificial life support. The word abstain was actually used. Of all of the perverse talking points liberals cite to justify killing with kindness the abstain claim is the worst; more so since no one knew what Terri wanted. The government does not allow Americans to abstain from anything these days. Obviously, an exception was made to accommodate the Grim Reaper in Terri’s Right to abstain from being murdered.
To no one’s surprise the ACLU came down on the side of killing Terri Schiavo. The ACLU is a charter member in the Culture of Death Club, while at the same time the ACLU fights the death penalty at every turn. Do not let the Culture of Death crowd’s push to abolish the death penalty fool you. Liberals are outraged by the death penalty because they fear the day they might find themselves strapped to a gurney.
NOTE: The U.N.’s phony-ass International Court of Justice does not allow a death penalty. The reason is simple. Politicians and the rich are the only people who get a trial in The Hague, Netherlands.
Parenthetically, a few years ago anti-death penalty liberals got the High Court to look into the method of lethal injections used by the states. They said that execution by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. At the time I resolved the constitutional issue real fast. I said the Nifty Nine should order states to order those officials who carry out a death sentence to use the same methods used by Jack “The Dripper” Kervokian (1928 - 2011) and the assisted-suicide crowd.
Democrats kill everything that walks on two feet except convicted murderers anyway. So if those states with the death penalty have a problem with cruel and unusual punishment they can use Jack the Dripper’s painless cocktail. According to liberals doctor-assisted suicide is painless.
Who can swear that Terri Schiavo’s life force, her emotions, her ability to know life was not functioning? Say that a bird landed on Terri’s windowsill. How can anyone say that Terri did not experience the same pleasure and curiosity that makes an infant giggle? The euthanasia crowd will never admit to that possibility because they only speak for themselves. They assume that because they do not want to live in a so-called vegetative state no one else does either.
My point: A brain dead vegetative state is a physical thing with no proof that thoughts and emotions are not alive and well somewhere else. People in the West assigned courage and cowardliness to the heart: “He has the heart of a lion” or “He is fainthearted.” The Chinese always thought the liver was the most important organ. That shows there has always been a suspicion that thoughts and emotions reside somewhere other than in the brain.
I never came across a great body of thought that put the brain at the center of life. Those who believe in euthanasia are the only ones who say that. I do not consider their political agenda a great body of thought.
If I am absolutely correct about this ——Terri’s very essence was starved in the cruelest way imaginable.
Agree or disagree with removing Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube, but you cannot deny that an individual got away with killing her because justification —— not the act —— was the deciding factor. By exonerating the person who did the act, did not the courts endorse the Nazi defense —— I was only following orders. Bottom line: The courts must always judge the act not the justification.
Florida’s courts allowed it, and the US Supreme Court refused to hear Schiavo’s case. Had the SCOTUS taken the case you can be certain the butchers would have screamed about the government interfering in our lives. Naturally, it is not government interference when a state court orders the feeding tube removed. The person who actually pulled the plug committed murder. I never found the name of the person who removed the feeding tube? And I never understood why in hell they were not arrested for premeditated murder?
Why murder? And why premeditated?
A person had to commit the physical act of removing the feeding tube well-knowing Terri’s death would be the result. That is premeditated murder. Think of it this way. Suppose the individual who removed Terri’s feeding tube had the court’s permission to shoot her rather than let her starve to death. Would that be premeditated murder?
Parenthetically, TV viewers are bombarded with government propaganda depicting hard-hitting cops and district attorneys ever-ready to lockup the bad guys, yet someone commits a deliberate act that ends in the death of another person and there are no cops or district attorneys in sight. In fact, the policeman on duty in Terri’s room was told to leave the room so he could not be a called as a witness to identify the murderer.
In addition, judges in Terri’s case are guilty of aiding and abetting a premeditated homicide. At the very least, someone in authority should have told those judges: “If you want that feeding tube removed come and do it yourself.” I know that if I worked at Terri’s hospice and someone ordered me to remove her feeding tube, I would have told them where to shove the job.
And how many Americans realize that Socialist priests in our courts issue orders while making damn sure that real blood does not soil their precious judicial robes.
And of course there is always this: “America is a nation of laws.” What a joke that is. America is a nation of judges issuing orders. Neither judges nor anyone else had the Right to end Terri’s life just because she could not speak for herself.
NOTE: The Left is forever citing the Nazis as the only villains in the twentieth century. Some try to equate conservatives to Nazis, yet a close look always shows that Socialists are the Nazi clones. Not punishing Terri Schiavo’s murderer is only one such example.
To justify taking an innocent individual’s life opens the door to governments murdering millions. If the tens of millions of murders done by governments in the last century taught anything it is that there is no slope slipperier than cultivating the government’s bloodlust. Bottom line: Never, never, never, give the government the authority to kill innocent people.
The road to governments slaughtering their own people begins with the public’s acceptance of things like mercy killing, doctor-assisted suicide, abortion on demand, and so on. The sheer number of abortions makes it the worst mass murder. Slaughtering tens of millions of infants (hundreds of millions worldwide) became doing a kindness for mothers.
A long time ago I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me? I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey. Science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so Democrats can hear them.
Finally, was I too hard on judges? Hardly! A snake is a snake; a judge is a judge. A venomous snake may drowse in a bed of flowers, but it remains a deadly snake. Snakes and judges do what they will do. They are creatures of habit no more able to change their ways than the Earth can alter its orbit around the sun.
This country’s euthanasia crowd already cite the healthcare systems in the UK, Canada, and Cuba as models of compassion. After Canada legislates government-approved euthanasia you can expect Democrats to push for a similar law. Should Congress drop the ball on the goal line they will turn to lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court to legislate another Roe v. Wade.
Following its 2019 elections, Canada is expected to approve euthanasia for sick children, joining the Netherlands and Belgium as the only nations in the world affirmatively sanctioning such practices.
The Council of Canadian Academies, a government advisory board has studied the expansion of euthanasia to include making it available for children, those with mental illness and so-called “advance requests” by those who wish to set in motion assisted suicide should they become incompetent to make the decision later.
Whereas assisted suicide is legal in some states in the U.S., no statistics are kept on the number of cases.
In Canada, however, it’s a booming business with thousands put to death by doctors and nurse practitioners since it was legalized nationwide in 2015. Clinics run TV commercials for euthanasia.
Nearly 2,000 were killed in 2017 alone in Canada, almost all by lethal injection.
The Council of Canadian Academies, a government advisory board has studied the expansion of euthanasia to include making it available for children, those with mental illness and so-called “advance requests” by those who wish to set in motion assisted suicide should they become incompetent to make the decision later.
Whereas assisted suicide is legal in some states in the U.S., no statistics are kept on the number of cases.
In Canada, however, it’s a booming business with thousands put to death by doctors and nurse practitioners since it was legalized nationwide in 2015. Clinics run TV commercials for euthanasia.
Nearly 2,000 were killed in 2017 alone in Canada, almost all by lethal injection.
Coming soon: Legal child euthanasia
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/23/2018 @ 5:28 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/coming-soon-legal-child-euthanasia/
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/23/2018 @ 5:28 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/coming-soon-legal-child-euthanasia/
The phrase “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” is often attributed to Associate Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892 - 1954), yet liberals are hellbent on bringing about America’s self-destruction. (Jackson took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court in order to act as the CHIEF PROSECUTOR in the best-known of the International Military Tribunals held in Nuremberg.)
There is nothing immoral in punishing those responsible for war crimes, but I always thought that they should be tried and punished by the victims in the country where the crimes took place —— not by an international body of any kind.
Socialist intellectuals have been working overtime establishing International law since the second half of the 19[SUP]th[/SUP] century. The 1961 movie Justice at Nuremberg was the first major propaganda attempt to sell it to the masses. J-at-N was shown on television’s Playhouse 90 before it was made into a theatrical movie. After listening to the dialogue it is hard to miss liberalism’s moral garbage.
The movie’s attack on love of country is even more offensive than is glorifying non-existent International law. That is not to say I put in with the kind of patriotism the Nazis practiced. The not-so-subliminal message that I object to is that patriotism itself was portrayed as the villain; Nazi judges went along out of their love for Germany.
Hitler came to power on false patriotism (nationalism). Obama came to power by paying scant lip service to his love of this country. Frankly, he did not need patriotism as a stepping stone to the White House. Had he needed it he would have used it. Luckily for Obama, and with a lot of help from the media, he avoided a patriotism pissing contest with his opponent John McCain.
Institutional sadism first preaches, then implements, the horrors that should be understood. Infanticide, euthanasia, population controls, death panels, forced sterilization, and doctor-assisted suicides, represent the very essence of institutional brutality. Every progressive ideal has been gaining acceptance while wearing a cloak of compassion.
NOTE: Islam added female mutilation to the list of institutional brutality in non-Muslim countries.
Incidentally, the high cost of keeping a comatose patient on life support is one of the arguments used to end life. The very people who make that argument never complain about the tremendous cost of feeding wealthy tax dollar parasites. In short: The number of individuals requiring life support is miniscule compared to the number of millionaire Democrat parasites in the federal government.
I noticed that the euthanasia lobby —— which includes the mainstream media —— list brain dead as a success. See this thread for more about brain dead:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-amp-Two-Evil-Non-Laws&p=2776904#post2776904
This is one aspect of brain dead that especially troubles me. There is an assumption that thoughts, emotions, feelings, etc., originate in the brain. Hence, brain dead sounds logical. I have never been convinced that that is the case. When you cut your finger an impulse is sent to the brain telling you to feel the pain in your finger. The paralyzing fear a person feels as their car skids towards an oncoming truck begins in the pit of their stomach, it does not originate in the brain.
Who can deny that thoughts are only processed by the brain originating elsewhere as in pain or fear? The brain is a processor and does not feel pain. As far as I know, there was no damage elsewhere sending signals to Terri’s brain telling her to feel pain. There was no evidence that she was feeling pain. Even if it can be shown beyond a doubt that she was in pain the answer is painkillers not euthanasia.
Those who killed Terri said that she was not in pain —— never admitting that starvation causes pain even if the brain was not functioning well enough to activate a defense mechanism.
Please do not compare the court-ordered murder of an innocent woman to the execution of a criminal after decades of tax dollar funded appeals. In any event, Terri Schiavo never hurt anyone, but she was killed without her consent anyway.
One of the arguments for killing Terri cited her Right to abstain from receiving artificial life support. The word abstain was actually used. Of all of the perverse talking points liberals cite to justify killing with kindness the abstain claim is the worst; more so since no one knew what Terri wanted. The government does not allow Americans to abstain from anything these days. Obviously, an exception was made to accommodate the Grim Reaper in Terri’s Right to abstain from being murdered.
To no one’s surprise the ACLU came down on the side of killing Terri Schiavo. The ACLU is a charter member in the Culture of Death Club, while at the same time the ACLU fights the death penalty at every turn. Do not let the Culture of Death crowd’s push to abolish the death penalty fool you. Liberals are outraged by the death penalty because they fear the day they might find themselves strapped to a gurney.
NOTE: The U.N.’s phony-ass International Court of Justice does not allow a death penalty. The reason is simple. Politicians and the rich are the only people who get a trial in The Hague, Netherlands.
Parenthetically, a few years ago anti-death penalty liberals got the High Court to look into the method of lethal injections used by the states. They said that execution by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. At the time I resolved the constitutional issue real fast. I said the Nifty Nine should order states to order those officials who carry out a death sentence to use the same methods used by Jack “The Dripper” Kervokian (1928 - 2011) and the assisted-suicide crowd.
Democrats kill everything that walks on two feet except convicted murderers anyway. So if those states with the death penalty have a problem with cruel and unusual punishment they can use Jack the Dripper’s painless cocktail. According to liberals doctor-assisted suicide is painless.
Who can swear that Terri Schiavo’s life force, her emotions, her ability to know life was not functioning? Say that a bird landed on Terri’s windowsill. How can anyone say that Terri did not experience the same pleasure and curiosity that makes an infant giggle? The euthanasia crowd will never admit to that possibility because they only speak for themselves. They assume that because they do not want to live in a so-called vegetative state no one else does either.
My point: A brain dead vegetative state is a physical thing with no proof that thoughts and emotions are not alive and well somewhere else. People in the West assigned courage and cowardliness to the heart: “He has the heart of a lion” or “He is fainthearted.” The Chinese always thought the liver was the most important organ. That shows there has always been a suspicion that thoughts and emotions reside somewhere other than in the brain.
I never came across a great body of thought that put the brain at the center of life. Those who believe in euthanasia are the only ones who say that. I do not consider their political agenda a great body of thought.
If I am absolutely correct about this ——Terri’s very essence was starved in the cruelest way imaginable.
Agree or disagree with removing Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube, but you cannot deny that an individual got away with killing her because justification —— not the act —— was the deciding factor. By exonerating the person who did the act, did not the courts endorse the Nazi defense —— I was only following orders. Bottom line: The courts must always judge the act not the justification.
Florida’s courts allowed it, and the US Supreme Court refused to hear Schiavo’s case. Had the SCOTUS taken the case you can be certain the butchers would have screamed about the government interfering in our lives. Naturally, it is not government interference when a state court orders the feeding tube removed. The person who actually pulled the plug committed murder. I never found the name of the person who removed the feeding tube? And I never understood why in hell they were not arrested for premeditated murder?
Why murder? And why premeditated?
A person had to commit the physical act of removing the feeding tube well-knowing Terri’s death would be the result. That is premeditated murder. Think of it this way. Suppose the individual who removed Terri’s feeding tube had the court’s permission to shoot her rather than let her starve to death. Would that be premeditated murder?
Parenthetically, TV viewers are bombarded with government propaganda depicting hard-hitting cops and district attorneys ever-ready to lockup the bad guys, yet someone commits a deliberate act that ends in the death of another person and there are no cops or district attorneys in sight. In fact, the policeman on duty in Terri’s room was told to leave the room so he could not be a called as a witness to identify the murderer.
In addition, judges in Terri’s case are guilty of aiding and abetting a premeditated homicide. At the very least, someone in authority should have told those judges: “If you want that feeding tube removed come and do it yourself.” I know that if I worked at Terri’s hospice and someone ordered me to remove her feeding tube, I would have told them where to shove the job.
And how many Americans realize that Socialist priests in our courts issue orders while making damn sure that real blood does not soil their precious judicial robes.
And of course there is always this: “America is a nation of laws.” What a joke that is. America is a nation of judges issuing orders. Neither judges nor anyone else had the Right to end Terri’s life just because she could not speak for herself.
NOTE: The Left is forever citing the Nazis as the only villains in the twentieth century. Some try to equate conservatives to Nazis, yet a close look always shows that Socialists are the Nazi clones. Not punishing Terri Schiavo’s murderer is only one such example.
To justify taking an innocent individual’s life opens the door to governments murdering millions. If the tens of millions of murders done by governments in the last century taught anything it is that there is no slope slipperier than cultivating the government’s bloodlust. Bottom line: Never, never, never, give the government the authority to kill innocent people.
The road to governments slaughtering their own people begins with the public’s acceptance of things like mercy killing, doctor-assisted suicide, abortion on demand, and so on. The sheer number of abortions makes it the worst mass murder. Slaughtering tens of millions of infants (hundreds of millions worldwide) became doing a kindness for mothers.
A long time ago I asked myself what inhuman pain I would have felt while I was being torn apart had my mother aborted me? I still cry knowing that no one hears the screams of a fetus while it is being torn to pieces more methodically than animals tear apart a prey. Science gave us so much unnecessary brutality, the least scientists can do is find a way to record the screams of a fetus so Democrats can hear them.
Finally, was I too hard on judges? Hardly! A snake is a snake; a judge is a judge. A venomous snake may drowse in a bed of flowers, but it remains a deadly snake. Snakes and judges do what they will do. They are creatures of habit no more able to change their ways than the Earth can alter its orbit around the sun.
This country’s euthanasia crowd already cite the healthcare systems in the UK, Canada, and Cuba as models of compassion. After Canada legislates government-approved euthanasia you can expect Democrats to push for a similar law. Should Congress drop the ball on the goal line they will turn to lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court to legislate another Roe v. Wade.
