Errant Jet Streams cross equator

moon

Satire for Sanity
'Death of winter': Jet streams cross equator, 'chaos' predicted

https://www.rt.com/viral/349034-jetstream-season-shift-equator/


The streams usually run from east to west but new data shows that the Northern Hemisphere’s streams have changed path and linked with streams in the south.

“Welcome to climate chaos. We must declare a global climate emergency” warned Paul Beckwith, a climate scientist from the University of Ottawa, when analyzing data from Earth Nullschool.

Beckwith explained the data in a video online in which he warned it could disrupt the world’s food supply and lead to “massive geopolitical unrest.”

Beckwith was alerted to the data by a blog post from environmentalist Robert Scribbler, who said the warming of polar air due to “human-forced climate change” was flattening the atmospheric slope from equator to pole, allowing the streams to deviate.

“It’s the very picture of weather weirding due to climate change,” said Scribbler. “Something that would absolutely not happen in a normal world, something, that if it continues, basically threatens seasonal integrity.”

A “death of winter” scenario could occur according to Scribbler, where summer heat occurs in winter and vice versa.

Sounds grim

Not all scientists have agreed with this summation though, with Meteorologist Marshall Shepherd warning that the new data would require proper vetting before he could give an informed opinion.
 
tabloid_climatology.jpg


“Climate System Scientist” Claims Jet Stream Crossing the Equator is Unprecedented

June 29th, 2016 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Paul Beckwith has a masters degree in laser optics, which he has somehow parlayed into being a “Climate System Scientist” to spread alarmism about the climate system. But his post “Unprecedented, Jet Stream Crosses Equator” suggests he knows little of meteorology, let alone climate.

A “jet stream” in the usual sense of the word is caused by the thermal wind, which cannot exist at the equator because there is no Coriolis force. To the extent that there is cross-equator flow at jet stream levels, it is usually from air flowing out of deep convective rain systems. That outflow often enters the subtropical jet stream, which is part of the average Hadley Cell circulation.

There is frequently cross-equatorial flow at jet stream altitudes, and that flow can connect up with a subtropical jet stream. But it has always happened, and always will happen, with or without the help of humans. Sometimes the flows connect up with each other and make it look like a larger flow structure is causing the jet stream to flow from one hemisphere to the other, but it’s in no way unprecedented.

We’ve really only known about jet streams since around WWII…one of my professors, Reid Bryson, was one of the first to advise the U.S. military that bombers flying to Japan might encounter strong head winds. The idea that something we have been observing for only several decades on a routine basis (upper tropospheric winds in the tropics) would exhibit “unprecedented” behavior is rather silly. I especially like this portion of Paul’s post:
.
“We must declare a global climate emergency. Please consider a donation to support my work..”
.
Nice touch, Mr. Beckwith.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2016/06...stream-crossing-the-equator-is-unprecedented/
 
Obviously controlled by the neo-Zionists.

It's interesting how these terms meet with a flurry of hysterical resistance when first used- and then become established political language.

No, Canute, nothing to do with neozionism- and it's extremely silly for you to suggest otherwise. But then- you are an established twat.
 
tabloid_climatology.jpg


“Climate System Scientist” Claims Jet Stream Crossing the Equator is Unprecedented

June 29th, 2016 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

Paul Beckwith has a masters degree in laser optics, which he has somehow parlayed into being a “Climate System Scientist” to spread alarmism about the climate system. But his post “Unprecedented, Jet Stream Crosses Equator” suggests he knows little of meteorology, let alone climate.

A “jet stream” in the usual sense of the word is caused by the thermal wind, which cannot exist at the equator because there is no Coriolis force. To the extent that there is cross-equator flow at jet stream levels, it is usually from air flowing out of deep convective rain systems. That outflow often enters the subtropical jet stream, which is part of the average Hadley Cell circulation.

There is frequently cross-equatorial flow at jet stream altitudes, and that flow can connect up with a subtropical jet stream. But it has always happened, and always will happen, with or without the help of humans. Sometimes the flows connect up with each other and make it look like a larger flow structure is causing the jet stream to flow from one hemisphere to the other, but it’s in no way unprecedented.

We’ve really only known about jet streams since around WWII…one of my professors, Reid Bryson, was one of the first to advise the U.S. military that bombers flying to Japan might encounter strong head winds. The idea that something we have been observing for only several decades on a routine basis (upper tropospheric winds in the tropics) would exhibit “unprecedented” behavior is rather silly. I especially like this portion of Paul’s post:
.
“We must declare a global climate emergency. Please consider a donation to support my work..”
.
Nice touch, Mr. Beckwith.

Well, if someone's going to call someone else's findings into question, then perhaps we should call them into question as well.

Roy W. Spencer signed "An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming", which includes the statement, "We believe Earth and its ecosystems - created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence - are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory." By the way, "Evangelical Declaration" came from the "Cornwall Alliance," an organization that acts as a front group for the "Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow," which gets its funding from oil companies like Chevron and Exxon/Mobil. (Nice touch, Mr. Spencer.)

He also wrote, "Twenty years ago, as a PhD scientist, I intensely studied the evolution versus intelligent design controversy for about two years. And finally, despite my previous acceptance of evolutionary theory as 'fact,' I came to the realization that intelligent design, as a theory of origins, is no more religious, and no less scientific, than evolutionism."

So he believes a magical being used magic to create the world just for us.

By my estimation that means he's lost all credibility as a scientist and as such is the last person who should be commenting on someone else's scientific findings.

Someone should tell him that "I Dream of Jeannie" was only partly based in fact.
 
Well, if someone's going to call someone else's findings into question, then perhaps we should call them into question as well.

Roy W. Spencer signed "An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming", which includes the statement, "We believe Earth and its ecosystems - created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence - are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory." By the way, "Evangelical Declaration" came from the "Cornwall Alliance," an organization that acts as a front group for the "Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow," which gets its funding from oil companies like Chevron and Exxon/Mobil. (Nice touch, Mr. Spencer.)

He also wrote, "Twenty years ago, as a PhD scientist, I intensely studied the evolution versus intelligent design controversy for about two years. And finally, despite my previous acceptance of evolutionary theory as 'fact,' I came to the realization that intelligent design, as a theory of origins, is no more religious, and no less scientific, than evolutionism."

So he believes a magical being used magic to create the world just for us.

By my estimation that means he's lost all credibility as a scientist and as such is the last person who should be commenting on someone else's scientific findings.

Someone should tell him that "I Dream of Jeannie" was only partly based in fact.

Yep, far easier to come out with a load of erroneous and irrelevant bullshit rather than actually address the science. That is usually Desh's job but she's been banned, have you stepped into the breach? Roy Spencer is a first rate scientist by anybody's account, what are your credentials?

From Wiki:

Spencer received a B.S. in atmospheric sciences from the University of Michigan in 1978 and his M.S. and Ph.D. in meteorology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1980 and 1982.[SUP][3][/SUP] His doctoral thesis was titled, A case study of African wave structure and energetics during Atlantic transit.[SUP][5]
[/SUP]
After receiving his Ph.D. in 1982, Spencer worked for two years as a research scientist in the Space Science and Engineering Center at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.[SUP][3][/SUP] He then joined NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center as a visiting scientist in 1984,[SUP][4][/SUP] where he later became Senior Scientist for Climate Studies.[SUP][3][/SUP] After leaving NASA in 2001, Spencer has been Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH).[SUP][3][/SUP] As well as his position at UAH, Spencer is currently the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite, a position he has held since 1994.[SUP][3]
[/SUP]
In 2001, he designed an algorithm to detect tropical cyclones and estimate their maximum sustained wind speed using the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU).[SUP][6][/SUP][SUP][7]
[/SUP]
Spencer has been a member of several science teams: the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Space Station Accommodations Analysis Study Team, Science Steering Group for TRMM, TOVS Pathfinder Working Group, NASA Headquarters Earth Science and Applications Advisory Subcommittee, and two National Research Council (NRC) study panels.[SUP][3][/SUP]
 
Back
Top