Equity is now racist?

Just deny it, the ambulance chaser advises the man caught in bed with a woman who is not his wife, by his wife.
 
Nothing said in typical political discussion on either side is based on fact.
We genuinely hate each other far too much to bother with facts.

I've said terrible things about Pigfucker Trump, and they're all totally true in this instance, but none of them matter.
Personalities don't, or at least shouldn't, matter in politics.
Policy positions matter, and while Trump's were as bad as have ever existed, his followers are far too stupid to discuss policy.

America can no longer exist as a unified, 50-state republic unless Reconstruction is imposed on the red states for at least the next fifty years.
Failing that, we need to partition right now. The Trump SCOTUS has turned America into a complete dystopia.
 
Jarod said:
Ok, fair. Is it racist?
Click to expand...

Here's one for you. What if Trump came out and said we need equity in the NBA? Would your initial response still be equity is a good thing and he's correct? Because to many equity means proportional representation and right now the NBA is far from equity in that regard.

One might think Trump was cynically using the term in that scenario however equity is equity right?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Nothing said in typical political discussion on either side is based on fact.
We genuinely hate each other far too much to bother with facts.

I've said terrible things about Pigfucker Trump, and they're all totally true in this instance, but none of them matter.
Personalities don't, or at least shouldn't, matter in politics.
Policy positions matter, and while Trump's were as bad as have ever existed, his followers are far too stupid to discuss policy.

America can no longer exist as a unified, 50-state republic unless Reconstruction is imposed on the red states for at least the next fifty years.
Failing that, we need to partition right now. The Trump SCOTUS has turned America into a complete dystopia.
Click to expand...

Way to stay on topic, half wit.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Nothing said in typical political discussion on either side is based on fact.
We genuinely hate each other far too much to bother with facts.

I've said terrible things about Pigfucker Trump, and they're all totally true in this instance, but none of them matter.
Personalities don't, or at least shouldn't, matter in politics.
Policy positions matter, and while Trump's were as bad as have ever existed, his followers are far too stupid to discuss policy.

America can no longer exist as a unified, 50-state republic unless Reconstruction is imposed on the red states for at least the next fifty years.
Failing that, we need to partition right now. The Trump SCOTUS has turned America into a complete dystopia.
Click to expand...

You yourself have said a board like this, a place in theory where people would come to discuss actually policy, is for pure entertainment/venting . Now you're complaining people don't discuss policy enough?
 
cawacko said:
Here's one for you. What if Trump came out and said we need equity in the NBA? Would your initial response still be equity is a good thing and he's correct? Because to many equity means proportional representation and right now the NBA is far from equity in that regard.

One might think Trump was cynically using the term in that scenario however equity is equity right?
Click to expand...

I would be confused and try to figure out what he meant by the statement. Depends on his words. I do not see equity as necessarily proportional representation. The devil is in the details.
 
The press Secretary had to “clean up” the V.P.’s racist comments on the black community being first to receive aid for Hurricane Ian.

Translation:

They have to lie about what we all saw and read that she said.

The ambulance chaser is doing the same thing.
 
cawacko said:
Here's one for you. What if Trump came out and said we need equity in the NBA? Would your initial response still be equity is a good thing and he's correct? Because to many equity means proportional representation and right now the NBA is far from equity in that regard.

One might think Trump was cynically using the term in that scenario however equity is equity right?
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
cawacko said:
You yourself have said a board like this, a place in theory where people would come to discuss actually policy, is for pure entertainment/venting . Now you're complaining people don't discuss policy enough?
Click to expand...

No, I'm not complaining. I'm pointing out, but not complaining, because internet discussions are an example of human DEvolution.
 
Jarod said:
Nobody but you s saying that.
Click to expand...

Is that so? Who wrote this Jarod?

"Maybe they did? But personally I doubt it, I suspect poor people suffered more than wealthy. A larger percentage of black people are poor."

In especially like then last line.
 
cawacko said:
Here's one for you. What if Trump came out and said we need equity in the NBA? Would your initial response still be equity is a good thing and he's correct? Because to many equity means proportional representation and right now the NBA is far from equity in that regard.

One might think Trump was cynically using the term in that scenario however equity is equity right?
Click to expand...

The NBA actually did play a better game sixty-odd years ago than the asphalt playground shit that they play now, so the point wouldn't be invalid.
 
Jarod said:
I would be confused and try to figure out what he meant by the statement. Depends on his words. I do not see equity as necessarily proportional representation. The devil is in the details.
Click to expand...

Then what do you see equity as? What does "equitable" hurricane aid looks exactly?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top